i'm a bit confused what the plan is regarding k to sr migration. in the
beginning i thought that k will keep on existing, but then was told
that the aim is to migrate from k to sr before next release.
this plan is not reflected by, for example, db schema. in
lib/srdb1/schema, there exists, for example, file kamailio-lcr.xml
although lcr module does not exist in modules_k, but in modules.
should i rename kamailio-lcr.xml to sr-lcr.xml or what?
-- juha
while testing new lcr module, i saw also this kind of segfault:
Jun 22 11:39:49 localhost /usr/sbin/sip-router[17180]: ERROR: lcr [lcr_mod.c:525]: AVP defunct_gw_avp has not been defined
Jun 22 11:39:49 localhost /usr/sbin/sip-router[17180]: ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:873]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module lcr
Jun 22 11:39:49 localhost kernel: [14513.650230] sip-router[17180]: segfault at 0 ip b7ab2a5f sp bfeb3470 error 4 in lcr.so[b7aad000+14000]
mod_init code leading to it is:
} else {
LM_ERR("AVP defunct_gw_avp has not been defined\n");
return -1;
}
any idea why the segfault?
-- juha
Revision: 5882
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=5882&view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2009-06-22 11:13:42 +0000 (Mon, 22 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
- fix double allocation length calculation in mi_add_attr function
- patch from marius zbihlei, marius dot zbihlei at 1and1 dot ro
Modified Paths:
--------------
branches/1.3/mi/attr.c
branches/1.4/mi/attr.c
branches/1.5/mi/attr.c
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#6 - Multipart SDP problem in Nathelper
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
Committed code to localise sdp in multipart bodies. Not tested much yet, though.
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=1f41271…
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=6#comment2
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla has taken ownership of the following task:
FS#6 - Multipart SDP problem in Nathelper
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=6
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#3 - msilo m_dump() does not notice de-registration
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
I committed code in registrar module to return different codes for save() function. Also msilo does checking only on REGISTER and uses expires contact parameter if exists.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=3#comment1
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.