Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: e973bbe5e7310861f77b17ce0afaf1cca35fe48a
URL: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=e973bbe…
Author: Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>
Committer: Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>
Date: Fri May 28 15:38:41 2010 +0300
modules/tm: new implementation of load_contacts()/next_contacts()
- Simpler implementation of load_contacts()/next_contacts() functions
based on recent changes related to Request-URI handling.
- Function next_contacts() does not anymore set any timers. Check
contact_avp and call t_set_fr() before calling t_relay() instead.
- Removed fr_timer_next module parameter, because it is not needed
anymore.
---
modules/tm/README | 255 ++++++++++++++------------------------
modules/tm/doc/functions.xml | 51 +++-----
modules/tm/doc/params.xml | 73 -----------
modules/tm/doc/tm.xml | 15 +--
modules/tm/t_serial.c | 279 ++++++++++++------------------------------
modules/tm/tm.c | 1 -
6 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 484 deletions(-)
Diff: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commitdiff;h=e97…
Hello all,
After compiling sip-router, if I run git status, the following files
are listed as untracked:
$ git status
# On branch master
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
# modules/auth/auth.7
# modules/privacy/README
# modules_s/acc_db/acc_db.7
# modules_s/acc_syslog/acc_syslog.7
# modules_s/auth_db/auth_db.7
# modules_s/avp/avp.7
# modules_s/avp_db/avp_db.7
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
The above files should be either added to the git repo or the ignore
list should be updated.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
Hello,
Both on master and kamailio_3.0:
CC (gcc) [M db_berkeley.so] bdb_res.o
bdb_res.c: In function ‘bdb_res_free’:
bdb_res.c:51: error: ‘DBC’ has no member named ‘close’
make: *** [bdb_res.o] Error 1
After checking the documentation, it seems that a function that works
and closes a cursor for versions > 4.2 is c_close(), but this is marked
as deprecated in 4.6, where the close() alternative is also present .
c_close() is still used in several places. My thoughts : either we
replace DBC->close() with DBC->c_close() or , keeping in mind
DB_VERSION, we use both c_close() or close() depending on the version on
the system.
Ideas?
Marius
Hello all,
The (k) ratelimit module is an enhanced version of the original (s)
ratelimit module.
Are there any objections in moving the ratelimit module from (k) to
generic and purging the (s) version?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas