THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#394 - $od and $rd missing in reply route
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
Internally the acc will take the values of the variables from the request stored in transaction. What you get in acc table, null/empty values?
In onreply_route, the sip response is handled and there is no r-uri for it. You eventually get its attributes using $T_req($od) and $T_req($rd).
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=394#comment1296
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
Hi Victor,
in one of your commits updating the init.d script for debian specs, you
removed the CFGFILE variable and replaced it inline with the path to the
configuration file.
That breaks the makefile target:
make install-initd-debian
This is useful when installing from sources, at is deploys the init.d
script and updates the paths internally.
Is anything wrong by keeping that CFGFILE and use it later in init.d script?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hello All!
After finishing with RTPproxy protocol support, I'm working on a
RTPproxy-ng protocol support in Wireshark. I've just submitted an
initial version with a very basic functionality:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/268/
So far there is no support for RTP/RTCP dissection based on a
RTPproxy-ng replies, no transaction matching, no expert functionality,
and the rest of functionality already existed in the RTPproxy
dissector is also missing, but I plan to add it back shortly.
I'm on a very early stage with RTPproxy-ng protocol support so I can't
really advise anyone to try it so just fyi.
Sorry for the crossposting.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#395 - call_control: Passthrough sip_application
User who did this - David M. Lee (leedm777)
----------
Attached is an updated patch. There was a request from OpenSIPs to be more specific and change the 'application' field to 'sip_application'.
----------
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=395#comment1295
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.