THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#440 - CRASH: segmentation fault if there is no dispatcher available
User who did this - Nuno Miguel Reis (nmreis)
----------
Hi Daniel!
The last attachment from Monday, 09 June 2014, 12:05 GMT+1 named kamailio.log.tar.bz2 was named that way by me, by mistake, but it really has the full dump output you have requested inside.
Moreover I agree with you that the crash could be related with the way I'm using presence.
I've sent an email some days ago to the mailing list asking about some errors regarding persistence of presence status in database. I didn't have any reply's.
I'm pretty sure i still have some mistakes on the way I'm dealing with presence right now but, kamailio shouldn't crash even if it is looping in a PUBLISH on 127.0.0.1 by some mistake right?
Looking forward to hear from you.
Best Regards,
Nuno.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=440#comment1521
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#440 - CRASH: segmentation fault if there is no dispatcher available
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
The last bz2 file you attached here is a syslog file, not the full dump with the extra info.
The transaction from the second file attached here shows a PUBLISH request, not an INVITE. The PUBLISH is looping locally a lot, as there seems to be a lot of VIA headers with 127.0.0.1.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=440#comment1520
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
*Hello,*
*Please accept my apologies for asking a simple question - Is there
any example which shows how can I create the dialog profile **value
based on the SIP domain or SIP Server IP (IP like- 112.23.134.5). I**
need to control many SIP Server IPs with limited channels to each with
my** Kamailio Proxy.*
*I am a newbie to kamailio world.*
*-- Warm Regds.MathuRahul*
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#441 - route name in action struct
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
First patch is ok, but the second has hardcoded only route for everything but failure route.
You can add a function like:
<code>
char* get_current_route_name() {
switch(route_type) {
case REQUEST_ROUTE:
return "route";
case FAILURE_ROUTE:
return "failure_route";
case BRANCH_ROUTE:
...
default:
return "unknown";
}
}
</code>
You can see all the relevant route types in route.h file from core.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=441#comment1519
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#440 - CRASH: segmentation fault if there is no dispatcher available
User who did this - Nuno Miguel Reis (nmreis)
----------
One more thing:
You probably already noticed but I've replaced all the visible IP addresses besides 127.0.0.1 with '<__HIDDEN__IP__ADDR__>'.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=440#comment1518
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#440 - CRASH: segmentation fault if there is no dispatcher available
User who did this - Nuno Miguel Reis (nmreis)
----------
Hi Daniel.
Yes the 2 are from the same dump. Even so i'm reattaching a new full dump with the extra info corresponding to the second file all in one.
Hope that helps.
BR,
Nuno.
----------
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=440#comment1517
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#439 - CRASH: segmentation fault after INVITE
User who did this - Nuno Miguel Reis (nmreis)
----------
Hi will try that later on.
I'll let you know the outcome as soon as possible.
Thanks.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=439#comment1516
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#441 - route name in action struct
User who did this - Víctor Seva (linuxmaniac)
----------
Removed \0 in first patch.
using route=[X] or failure_route=[Y] in the output.
----------
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=441#comment1515
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#439 - CRASH: segmentation fault after INVITE
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
Can you grab the log messages via syslog? Because it includes the pid in the message and it is possible to see what the process did before crashing. Now it is impossible to figure out what the process that crashed did.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=439#comment1514
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#442 - crash when using append_body_part()
User who did this - Víctor Seva (linuxmaniac)
----------
Sorry the log was created with a working version of another module. This is the log of the crash in with master version.
----------
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=442#comment1513
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.