THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#446 - sca_call_info_update() function for 180 responses
User who did this - Jorj Bauer (jorj)
----------
Confirmed working, tested with Polycom OS 3.3.4 and 4.0.6 - no adverse affects found against 3.3.4.
I would trim the patch - remove lines 1075-1077 of sca_call_info.c:
- state = SCA_APPEARANCE_STATE_ALERTING;
- break;
-
and let it fall through to 183.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=446#comment1546
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
Hello,
I'm running the latest Kamailio 4.1 branch and
rtpengine:master:15640991d7fc9d398749f77460b821296cccdcb6, and am
running into a curious issue where the SDP body is duplicated (included
twice) on a second branch.
The scenario is that call goes out on branch #1 and an
rtpproxy_offer("ow-") is made. That branch fails with a 503 and another
branch goes out with the same offer to a different destination.
The original SDP offer on branch #1:
v=0
o=Sansay-VSXi 188 1 IN IP4 rtpengine
s=Session Controller
c=IN IP4 rtpengine
t=0 0
m=audio 32816 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv
a=rtcp:32817
The SDP offer on branch #2 ends up being:
v=0
o=Sansay-VSXi 188 1 IN IP4 rtpengine
s=Session Controller
c=IN IP4 rtpengine
t=0 0
m=audio 32816 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv
a=rtcp:32817
v=0
o=Sansay-VSXi 188 1 IN IP4 rtpengine
s=Session Controller
c=IN IP4 rtpengine
t=0 0
m=audio 32816 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv
a=rtcp:32817
Interestingly enough, this seems to be premeditated, because on the
first one, the Content-Length is 237, and on the second, 434. So,
something clearly thinks that this is an appropriate thing to do.
If it makes a difference, I'm using two rtpengines RR'd in a set.
I am unable to reproduce this in my development environment and am
unsure as to whether it's something that happens in all circumstances
where there is such failover, or only intermittently. Still, is there
any reason why it could be?
Thanks!
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
Please be kind to the English language:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#450 - CNXCC: use of pseudo-variables in *cnxcc:call-shutdown* event route
User who did this - Guillaume Bour (gbour)
----------
Thank you Carlos,
No, I do not have git write access
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=450#comment1545
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#450 - CNXCC: use of pseudo-variables in *cnxcc:call-shutdown* event route
User who did this - Carlos Ruiz Diaz (caruizdiaz)
----------
Hi,
the patch looks good. Do you have write access to the repo?
I will try it myself later today or possibly tomorrow, and push it to master in case you can't do it.
Thanks for you contribution :).
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=450#comment1544
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below.
User who did this - Guillaume Bour (gbour)
Attached to Project - sip-router
Summary - CNXCC: use of pseudo-variables in *cnxcc:call-shutdown* event route
Task Type - Improvement
Category - Module
Status - Unconfirmed
Assigned To -
Operating System - All
Severity - Low
Priority - Normal
Reported Version - Development
Due in Version - Undecided
Due Date - Undecided
Details -
By adding real from and to headers in built fake SIP message when executing *cnxcc:call-shutdown* event route,
it allows the use of pseudo-variables such as $fU or $tU, as well as dialog variables.
i.e:
<code>
event_route[cnxcc:call-shutdown] {
xlog("L_INFO", "cnxcc [$ci]: $fU is out of credit ($dlg_var(cnxcc_start))\n");
}
</code>
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=450
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#449 - CRASH: Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
User who did this - Nuno Miguel Reis (nmreis)
----------
Hi Daniel.
Yes, there were some hints in the log file. Please take a look at the attached log file.
The PID is between square brackets after the timestamp.
Look for timestamp: '20140708 10:49:57.074009'. That should be the cause.
Thanks.
----------
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=449#comment1543
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#448 - usrloc driver error on query: Duplicate entry 'XXXXXXXXXXXX' for key 'ruid_idx'
User who did this - Savolainen Dmitri (sdi)
----------
i have tested of course.
before reboot user 1111(a)sip.erinaco.ru exists
<code>
mysql>select * from location where username='1111' and domain='sip.erinaco.ru' \G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 112154
ruid: ulcx-53b65903-dec-1
username: 1111
domain: sip.erinaco.ru
contact: sip:1111@192.168.10.100
received: NULL
path: NULL
expires: 1970-01-01 03:00:00
q: 1.00
callid: dfjrewr12386fd6-343(a)kamailio.mi
cseq: 1
last_modified: 1970-01-01 03:00:00
flags: 0
cflags: 0
user_agent: SIP Router MI Server
socket: NULL
methods: NULL
instance: NULL
reg_id: 0
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
</code>
[snen@sw4]# ./kamctl restart
[snen@sw4]# ./kamctl ul add '1111(a)sip.erinaco.ru' 'sip:1111@192.168.10.100'
let's have a look at kamailio log:
Jul 11 11:55:58 sw4 ./kamailio[28446]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Duplicate entry 'ulcx-53b65903-dec-1' for key 'ruid_idx'
Jul 11 11:57:58 sw4 ./kamailio[28446]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Duplicate entry 'ulcx-53b65903-dec-1' for key 'ruid_idx'
Jul 11 11:59:58 sw4 ./kamailio[28446]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Duplicate entry 'ulcx-53b65903-dec-1' for key 'ruid_idx'
let's have a look at mysql query log:
<code>
1453 Query update location set expires='1970-01-01 03:00:00',q=1.00 ,cseq=1,flags=0,cflags=0,user_agent='SIP Router MI Server',received=NULL,path=NULL,socket=NULL,methods=NULL,last_modified='1970-01-01 03:00:00',callid='dfjrewr12386fd6-343(a)kamailio.mi',instance=NULL,reg_id=0,contact='sip:1111@192.168.10.100' where ruid='ulcx-53b65903-dec-1'
1453 Query insert into location (username,contact,expires,q,callid,cseq,flags,cflags,user_agent,received,path,socket,methods,last_modified,ruid,instance,reg_id,domain ) values ('1111','sip:1111@192.168.10.100','1970-01-01 03:00:00',1.00 ,'dfjrewr12386fd6-343(a)kamailio.mi',1,0,0,'SIP Router MI Server',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'1970-01-01 03:00:00','ulcx-53b65903-dec-1',NULL,0,'sip.erinaco.ru')
</code>
now, let's update again (second update after reboot):
[snen@sw4]# ./kamctl ul add '1111(a)sip.erinaco.ru' 'sip:1111@192.168.10.100'
and look at query log
<code>
140711 12:13:58 1453 Query update location set expires='1970-01-01 03:00:00',q=1.00 ,cseq=2,flags=0,cflags=0,user_agent='SIP Router MI Server',received=NULL,path=NULL,socket=NULL,methods=NULL,last_modified='1970-01-01 03:00:00',callid='dfjrewr12386fd6-343(a)kamailio.mi',instance=NULL,reg_id=0,contact='sip:1111@192.168.10.100' where ruid='ulcx-53b65903-dec-1'
</code>
so cseq incremented after second update only, and the callid is the same
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=448#comment1542
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#449 - CRASH: Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
Were there any error messages in the syslog?
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=449#comment1541
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task is now closed:
FS#445 - modules/tmx: t_is_failure_route() code or documentation is wrong
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: If still considered an issue, re-open with further details.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=445
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#448 - usrloc driver error on query: Duplicate entry 'XXXXXXXXXXXX' for key 'ruid_idx'
User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda)
----------
After reboot there is a different call-id (because is randomly generated now), so it should be ok. Have you tested and get the error after reboot?
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=448#comment1540
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.