sr-dev May 2015

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

34 participants
297 discussions

[kamailio] event on table location Duplicate entry for key 'ruid_idx' (#30)

by ovoshlook

Hello. We use 2 kamailio servers cluster and we have porblems with db. Database failed pecause of error: Could not execute Write_rows_v1 event on table production.location; Duplicate entry 'uloc-54aae947-86d-a67' for key 'ruid_idx', Error_code: 1062; handler error HA_ERR_FOUND_DUPP_KEY; the event's master log FIRST, end_log_pos 380, Internal MariaDB error code: 1062 But a location table no row 'ruid_idx' and no entry uloc-54aae947-86d-a67. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/30

8 years, 10 months

[kamailio] Adding publish in registration functionality, sending "closed" NOTIFY when presense has expired (#177)

by barabasp

The commit contains pua_usrloc modifications, which simplifies the publish and regisration processes: in every REGISTER an implicit publish is built in. In this way, a device e.g. do not need to send two individual request towards kamailio (REGISTER, PUBLISH), it can be achieved in a single but extended REGISTER request. Another small fix is that if the publication is expired (due to broken TCP e.g.), a "closed" NOTIFY should be sent to the contacts. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/177 -- Commit Summary -- * Adding publish in registration functionality -- File Changes -- M modules/pua_usrloc/pua_usrloc.c (4) M modules/pua_usrloc/ul_publish.c (152) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/177.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/177.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/177

9 years

Re: [sr-dev] Is there a sense in calling run_onsend() after the msg_send() function?

by Lucian Balaceanu

Hi Daniel, I must admit this run_onsend() patch for stateful replies creation was not quite a success story. However, I think it serves a practical purpose, for example in Homer tracing and could be useful for the community. Again, I propose my past solution, with some questions: 1. I am unsure if the place I introduced the run_onsend call is appropriate since the buf used for msg_send is constructed build_res_buf_from_sip_req and build_res_buf_from_sip_res calls. 2. Also, we can maybe unite these if call branches I created: send_res = msg_send(&uas_rb->dst, buf, res_len); send_res = SEND_PR_BUFFER( uas_rb, buf, res_len ); 3. Do you think a get_send_socket snippet as follows should be inserted before the /*if (onsend_route_enabled(SIP_REPLY)){*/ : if(dst.send_sock == NULL) { dst.send_sock=get_send_socket(msg, &dst.to, dst.proto); if (dst.send_sock==0){ LM_ERR("cannot forward reply\n"); } } Thank you, Lucian On 10/29/2014 02:15 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello Lucian, > > I applied your patch with some fixes. > > I haven't checked with stateful replies, at some point a function from > core should be used. You can go ahead and see if it works, if not, let > me know and I can look into it as well. You can follow the callbacks > for TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT or TMCB_RESPONSE_FWDED inside tm code, they > should lead to the place where a sip response is going to be sent out. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 27/10/14 12:51, Lucian Balaceanu wrote: >> Hello Daniel, >> >> I must admit I only saw your mail last Friday. Until the 10th of >> October I was also on vacation. I know that you actually committed >> some of the changes together with your comments on the 12th this month. >> >> I don't know if we can consider the topic of the patch closed. As far >> as I understand, the state-full replies have not been addressed, >> right? (There should be a change in the t_reply.c) I followed the >> code to the relay_reply but I did not yet come to find the send >> function. Should I pursue further? >> >> Thank you, >> Lucian Balaceanu >> >>> Hi Lucian, >>> >>> somehow I forgot to follow up on this. But we need to get sorted out >>> soon, before we release, so it works as expected with the new >>> version. See more comments inline. >>> >>> >>> On 17/09/14 18:09, Lucian Balaceanu wrote: >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> Please forgive me for my delay in responding to your mail. >>>> Please find attached a second version of the onsend_route_reply >>>> patch (which again has some problems). As per your previous >>>> indications I did the following: >>>> >>>> *Issue1* >>>>> From performances point of view, there can be added a config >>>>> parameter to enable running of onsend_route for replies: >>>>> >>>>> onsend_route_reply = 0|1 >>>> >>>> Following >>>> http://www.asipto.com/pub/kamailio-devel-guide/#c08add_parameters I >>>> have tried to add onsend_route_reply parameter. The code compiles, >>>> but when trying to start kamailio with this parameter inside, the >>>> parsing fails with syntax errors signaling: >>>> >>>> / 0(1321) :<core> [cfg.y:3423]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config >>>> file kamailio-basic.cfg.4.1, from line 107, column 1 to line 108, >>>> column 0: syntax error >>>> 0(1321) : <core> [cfg.y:3423]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config >>>> file kamailio-basic.cfg.4.1, from line 107, column 1 to line 108, >>>> column 0: >>>> ERROR: bad config file (2 errors)/ >>> >>> The issue is: >>> >>> +<INITIAL>{ONSEND_RT_REPLY} { yylval.intval=atoi(yytext); >>> + yy_number_str=yytext; return NUMBER; } >>> >>> It should be: >>> >>> +<INITIAL>{ONSEND_RT_REPLY} { yylval.intval=atoi(yytext); >>> + yy_number_str=yytext; return ONSEND_RT_REPLY; } >>> >>>> >>>> *Issue2* >>>>> #define onsend_enabled(rtype) >>>>> (onsend_rt.rlist[DEFAULT_RT]?((rtype==SIP_REPLY)?onsend_route_reply:1):0) >>>> That is to say you see it best to take the chek for >>>> onsend_rt.list[DEFAULT_RT] from inside run_onsend() function and >>>> call this onsend_enabled(...) before the run_onsend()? >>> >>> This is to detect whether the onsend_route should be executed for >>> SIP replies. The condition being: >>> >>> - if is a sip reply and onsend_route is set and the >>> onsend_route_reply parameter is 1 >>>> >>>> *Issue3* >>>>> On the other hand, is onsend_route also executed for local >>>>> requests? I had in mind it is only for received requests that are >>>>> forwarded ... Iirc, on onsend_route, the sip message is the one >>>>> received, the outgoing content being accessible via $snd(buf). >>>>> >>>> I agree with you with taking out the locally generated requests and >>>> only left the run_onsend call in do_forward_reply function (inside >>>> forward.c). >>>> Could you point me to the reply relaying function that is called >>>> for state-full processing? >>> Stateful processing for replies is mainly done in t_reply.c from tm >>> module. At some point there should be a send buffer function call. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>>> >>>> Thank you and sorry again for my late answer, >>>> Lucian >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> >>> >> > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

9 years, 2 months

[kamailio] core parsing of SIP message failed errors (#107)

by jcohn25

I finally got everything working but see to consistently receive the following 3 errors (see below) over and over when a call is being collected? Versions: Homer 3.6 kamailio 4.3.0-dev4 Captagent 4.2.0 Any assistance would be appreciated. Errors: Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_fline.c:257]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 0) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<HEP3#004>> Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: <core> [receive.c:129]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (127.0.0.1:33264/1) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_fline.c:257]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 0) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<HEP3#002Ü> Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: <core> [receive.c:129]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (127.0.0.1:33264/1) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/107

9 years, 2 months

RTPEngine - REDIS Plugin

by Carsten Bock

Hi everyone, several months ago, we've implemented a plugin for RTPEngine to synchronize it with a REDIS-Database. This allows RTPEngine to operate in a HA, as you can restart RTPEngine and/or make a failover to another machine with the same IP (e.g. using Heartbeat or similar), WITHOUT LOOSING ACTIVE SESSIONS. This enhancement was originally implemented by Carlos Ruiz Diaz. Due to lack of time, it still requires RTPEngine 3.3 and needs an update, to work with later versions. It can be found here: https://github.com/ngvoice/rtpengine-redis-plugin If anyone is interested in contributing to this extension, please ping me and i will happily add you as a contributor. Thanks, Carsten -- Carsten Bock CEO (Geschäftsführer) ng-voice GmbH Schomburgstr. 80 D-22767 Hamburg / Germany http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com Office +49 40 5247593-0 Fax +49 40 5247593-99 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock Ust-ID: DE279344284 Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/

9 years, 2 months

[kamailio] UAC trouble with REGISTER to provider (#140)

by ovoshlook

Hello. We use UAC for RGISTER some trunks After fiew days normally work we have an issue that UAC not respond to 401 reply with WWW-Authenticate with reREGISTER with WWW. We have only 2 packets- REGISTR and 401. IP 10.0.1.12.5068 > 1.2.3.4.5060: UDP, length 467 E.......@..F ...............REGISTER sip:provider.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my.service.com:5068;branch=z9hG4bKdb22.edd7eac5000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:login@provider.com> From: <sip:login@provider.com>;tag=6a39af2190f8b2c99cc63bfeb3a3959c-bfba CSeq: 10 REGISTER Call-ID: 5e171580088d170a-9952(a)10.0.1.12 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (4.3.0-dev5 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:login@my.service.com:5068> Expires: 360 IP 1.2.3.4.5060 > 10.0.1.12.5068: UDP, length 571 Q.......-. ........C.NSIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my.service.com:5068;branch=z9hG4bKdb22.edd7eac5000000000000000000000000.0;received=23.100.24.250 From: <sip:login@provider.com>;tag=6a39af2190f8b2c99cc63bfeb3a3959c-bfba To: <sip:login@provider.com>;tag=as1550511c Call-ID: 5e171580088d170a-9952(a)10.0.1.12 CSeq: 10 REGISTER Server: FastTel SoftSwitch Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH Supported: replaces WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm="provider.com", nonce="109104dc" Content-Length: 0 We have another trunk and reREGISTER is correctly REGISTER sip:another_prov.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my.service.com:5068;branch=z9hG4bK7fd1.3d7c2fd7000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:login_to_another_prov@another_prov.com> From: <sip:login_to_another_prov@another_prov.com>;tag=6a39af2190f8b2c99cc63bfeb3a3959c-f8ba CSeq: 10 REGISTER Call-ID: 5e171580088d1edd-9952(a)10.0.1.12 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (4.3.0-dev5 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:login_to_another_prov@my.service.com:5068> Expires: 360 IP another_prov.com.5060 > 10.0.1.12.5068: UDP, length 544 E..<F...$. .6... ........(..SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my.service.com:5068;branch=z9hG4bK7fd1.3d7c2fd7000000000000000000000000.0;rport=5068;received=23.100.28.126 To: <sip:login_to_another_prov@another_prov.com>;tag=04e2a294d0728b89107e081a19babab4.d569 From: <sip:login_to_another_prov@another_prov.com>;tag=6a39af2190f8b2c99cc63bfeb3a3959c-f8ba CSeq: 10 REGISTER Call-ID: 5e171580088d1edd-9952(a)10.0.1.12 WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="another_prov.com", nonce="VTifD1U4neNLMSYRoxNlOpD7hPSu3ET3" Server: kamailio (4.2.1 (x86_64/linux)) Content-Length: 0 IP 10.0.1.12.5068 > another_prov.com.5060: UDP, length 690 E...uT..@... ...6...........REGISTER sip:another_prov.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my.service.com:5068;branch=z9hG4bK8fd1.ea73d070000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:login_to_another_prov@another_prov.com> From: <sip:login_to_another_prov@another_prov.com>;tag=6a39af2190f8b2c99cc63bfeb3a3959c-f8ba CSeq: 11 REGISTER Call-ID: 5e171580088d1edd-9952(a)10.0.1.12 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (4.3.0-dev5 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:login_to_another_prov@my.service.com:5068> Expires: 360 Authorization: Digest username="login_to_another_prov", realm="another_prov.com", nonce="VTifD1U4neNLMSYRoxNlOpD7hPSu3ET3", uri="sip:another_prov.com", response="2ee14a437173700e88056279b854749f", algorithm=MD5 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/140

9 years, 4 months

[kamailio] Unquoted IPv6 Contact header alias parameter causes issues with Asterisk (PJSIP) & TOPOH module (#120)

by Anthony Messina

When using Kamailio from the master branch, I'm encountering an issue where IPv6 contact address aliases that are added via ```set_contact_alias()``` for WebSocket connections (for example) are unquoted and create problems for Asterisk: ``` pjsip:0 <?>: sip_transport. Error processing 3633 bytes packet from UDP 10.0.0.1:5060 : PJSIP syntax error exception when parsing 'Request Line' header on line 11 col 129: ``` and TOPOH garbles the Request-URI when processing the ACK: ``` WARNING: sanity [sanity.c:236]: check_ruri_scheme(): failed to parse request uri [�a�{1me▒s�na@50�9��1.�8:�2v0;i��a��=11>7�n7x>10O�2v0~1] ``` I have tested this with CSipSimple nightly branch (PJSIP) Asterisk 13.2.0 (PJSIP), Google Chrome 41.0.2272.118, and Firefox 37 and all fail to handle the Contact alias parameter properly. An example of an invite that shows this issue follows (this INVITE is without TOPOH on). ``` INVITE sip:testuser@example.com SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=t5r2736hf9;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:[2001:db8::98]:5061;transport=ws;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=t5r2736hf9;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bKa3e8.2bb6508fbc0cf8cc55c1eb6c0eca0b38.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WSS 2e6orc23ptjv.invalid;rport=43691;received=2001:db8::99;branch=z9hG4bK450538 Max-Forwards: 69 To: <sip:testuser@example.com> From: "WS Test User 1" <sip:wstest1@example.com>;tag=t5r2736hf9 Call-ID: uugmpjgjpoklrnf0um56 CSeq: 7244 INVITE Contact: <sip:wstest1@example.com;gr=urn:uuid:2e54e8a2-66e4-433a-a024-b57f3665a44b;alias=[2001:db8::99]~43691~6> Allow: ACK,CANCEL,BYE,OPTIONS,INFO,NOTIFY,INVITE Content-Type: application/sdp Supported: gruu,outbound User-Agent: SIP.js/0.6.4 Content-Length: 2768 v=0 o=- 867554869709517848 2 IN IP4 10.0.0.1 s=- t=0 0 a=msid-semantic: WMS livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH m=audio 30158 RTP/SAVP 111 103 104 9 0 8 106 105 13 126 c=IN IP4 10.0.0.1 a=rtpmap:111 opus/48000/2 a=fmtp:111 minptime=10; useinbandfec=1 a=rtpmap:103 ISAC/16000 a=rtpmap:104 ISAC/32000 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:106 CN/32000 a=rtpmap:105 CN/16000 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=maxptime:60 a=ssrc:1444733772 cname:CuBdEZ9bIWQc1sE+ a=ssrc:1444733772 msid:livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH ebd0066b-73b9-467c-b696-36e0fa7d72b7 a=ssrc:1444733772 mslabel:livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH a=ssrc:1444733772 label:ebd0066b-73b9-467c-b696-36e0fa7d72b7 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:30159 a=rtcp-mux a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:/fmyETo1BwAlupltb64sy5Za6e37BW0p5jMmvqHU a=setup:actpass a=fingerprint:sha-1 76:27:60:1E:64:94:B4:6E:8A:64:72:2D:41:2C:B8:F3:FF:4C:1D:56 a=ice-ufrag:U4XlaM4U a=ice-pwd:HqnTPTU5DY3j1yB4XVEL9rs1tn a=candidate:vVzo18e51E8EXCNy 1 UDP 2130706431 10.0.0.1 30158 typ host a=candidate:vVzo18e51E8EXCNy 2 UDP 2130706430 10.0.0.1 30159 typ host a=candidate:xCpWH2paVucFSQXn 1 UDP 2130706175 2001:db8::1 30158 typ host a=candidate:xCpWH2paVucFSQXn 2 UDP 2130706174 2001:db8::1 30159 typ host m=video 30196 RTP/SAVP 100 116 117 96 c=IN IP4 10.0.0.1 a=rtpmap:100 VP8/90000 a=rtcp-fb:100 ccm fir a=rtcp-fb:100 nack a=rtcp-fb:100 nack pli a=rtcp-fb:100 goog-remb a=rtpmap:116 red/90000 a=rtpmap:117 ulpfec/90000 a=rtpmap:96 rtx/90000 a=fmtp:96 apt=100 a=ssrc-group:FID 616715905 3177427003 a=ssrc:616715905 cname:CuBdEZ9bIWQc1sE+ a=ssrc:616715905 msid:livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH bb5df7ec-28a9-4e94-89a3-2ebb45a9f5bb a=ssrc:616715905 mslabel:livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH a=ssrc:616715905 label:bb5df7ec-28a9-4e94-89a3-2ebb45a9f5bb a=ssrc:3177427003 cname:CuBdEZ9bIWQc1sE+ a=ssrc:3177427003 msid:livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH bb5df7ec-28a9-4e94-89a3-2ebb45a9f5bb a=ssrc:3177427003 mslabel:livWfUwMWQJMemgnFyBQDf1VXUo9Q0AXwHnH a=ssrc:3177427003 label:bb5df7ec-28a9-4e94-89a3-2ebb45a9f5bb a=sendrecv a=rtcp:30197 a=rtcp-mux a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:qQRmOwum0YFHgKKzt2dRX0uAQhSwlmxscI3P3JUI a=setup:actpass a=fingerprint:sha-1 76:27:60:1E:64:94:B4:6E:8A:64:72:2D:41:2C:B8:F3:FF:4C:1D:56 a=ice-ufrag:ISaptX08 a=ice-pwd:mxP343kHexU8SwtbCeRj4WyMNI a=candidate:vVzo18e51E8EXCNy 1 UDP 2130706431 10.0.0.1 30196 typ host a=candidate:vVzo18e51E8EXCNy 2 UDP 2130706430 10.0.0.1 30197 typ host a=candidate:xCpWH2paVucFSQXn 1 UDP 2130706175 2001:db8::1 30196 typ host a=candidate:xCpWH2paVucFSQXn 2 UDP 2130706174 2001:db8::1 30197 typ host ``` I believe that the Contact header alias parameter might need quotes in order to properly handle the bracketed IPv6 alias address, something like the following, but unfortunately I haven't been able to find evidence to be certain that this is the fix, though I do notice that parameters in headers with special characters like brackets are often quoted. ``` Contact: <sip:wstest1@example.com;gr=urn:uuid:2e54e8a2-66e4-433a-a024-b57f3665a44b;alias="[2001:db8::99]~43691~6"> ``` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/120

9 years, 4 months

[kamailio] Errors work BLF modules pua and presence (#104)

by klistrod

Errors work BLF modules pua and presence: loadmodule "presence.so" loadmodule "presence_xml.so" loadmodule "presence_dialoginfo.so" loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_dialoginfo.so" modparam("presence", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("presence_xml", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 1) modparam("presence_dialoginfo", "force_single_dialog", 1) 5(18085) ERROR: presence [publish.c:139]: msg_presentity_clean(): event not found 5(18085) ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Duplicate entry 'a.1425449702.18081.57.5---' for key 'pua_idx' 5(18085) ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:335]: db_do_update(): error while submitting query 5(18085) ERROR: pua [pua.c:1079]: db_update(): while updating in database --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/104

9 years, 4 months

[kamailio] Core crashed, EOF on 23 (#158)

by Jay J

``` kamailio 4.3.0-pre0 (x86_64/linux) e1d68c flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: e1d68c ``` Hi, Today everything was business as usual, when this happened: ``` May 13 03:40:32 Kamailio2 kamailio[7104]: CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:275]: receive_fd(): EOF on 23 May 13 03:40:32 Kamailio2 kamailio[7064]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:728]: handle_sigs(): child process 7066 exited by a signal 11 May 13 03:40:32 Kamailio2 kamailio[7064]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:731]: handle_sigs(): core was generated May 13 03:40:32 Kamailio2 kamailio[7064]: INFO: <core> [main.c:743]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD May 13 03:40:32 Kamailio2 kamailio[7068]: INFO: <core> [main.c:794]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received ``` Needless to say, Kamailio crashed (thankfully after hours). No more related logs, unfortunately. Was wondering if you can tell anything just by the excerpt above. Thanks. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/158

9 years, 4 months

[kamailio] Allow domain_attrs 'type' field to be a mysql BIGINT (#182)

by divereigh

Allow 'type' field in domain_attrs to be a DB1_BIGINT as well as a DB1_INT. If you are using a view with 'type' as a calculated field on a 64 bit machine, then mysql will return the type of 'type' to be a bigint, not an int (and no amount of CASTing or CONVERTing will fix it). You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/182 -- Commit Summary -- * Allow 'type' field in domain_attrs to be a DB1_BIGINT as well as a -- File Changes -- M modules/domain/domain.c (3) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/182.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/182.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/182

9 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev May 2015