Sorry for not being specific in [#1567](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1567). I had to clarify that I was talking about server role only.
>From what I understood server role configurations can be distinguish one from another only by socket, provided in their configuration. TLS module documentation says:
> "... different TLS parameters can be specified on a per role (server or client) and domain basis (for now only IPs)".
Which hints that additional tests for matching incoming connections against configured server profiles were in mind. I would like to request a feature which could allow matching them against domain name if that's possible.
One of the options may be checking client's certificate CN if _require_certificate_ parameter is set to yes.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1570
TLS module documentation says: "different TLS parameters can be specified on a per role (server or client) and domain basis (for now only IPs)". It would be nice feature if it could use same socket and distinguish connections by domain name.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1567
Apologies if i have not kept with the reporting standard.
Insertion attempts of out-of-credit replies from resume_on_initial_ccr callback, are corrupting the ro_session list. i.e. they nullify the first and last fields, which under certain conditions the first entry gets restored but not the last.This then crashes the process at ro_session_hash.c (link_ro_session), where the first entry has a valid address but the last does not.
Solution: ro_session_hash.h - unlink_unsafe_ro_session - check if the session to be linked is actually part of list i.e
if ((ro_session->next == 0x00) &&
(ro_session->prev == 0x00) &&
(ro_session != ro_session_entry->first) )
{
ro_session, &(ro_session->ro_tl),
ro_session->callid.len,
ro_session->callid.len,
ro_session->callid.s);
return;
}
rest of the code ....
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1549