sr-dev January 2019

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

27 participants
301 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] topos module seems to break re-SUBSCRIBE routing to downstream destinations (#1724)
by George Diamantopoulos 18 Nov '20

18 Nov '20

### Description Kamailio seems to fail to properly route in-dialog SUBSCRIBE with the topos module enabled. In this configuration, SUBSCRIBEs are expected to be delivered to a downstream UAS, an asterisk instance in the internal network. record_route() is executed for all initial requests, including SUBSCRIBEs. Routing is performed correctly with the topos module disabled, no other modifications were needed.  ### Troubleshooting I haven't been able to work around this issue in any other way other than disabling the topos module. #### Reproduction The configuration used is a heavily modified version of the example configuration file, but the handling of SUBSCRIBEs is generally simple. The initial SUBSCRIBE is subject to some tests, the R-URI is edited and dispatched to a farm of asterisk servers based on some criteria. Record Routing is enforced, so subsequent in-dialog re-SUBSCRIBEs are expected to be routed with loose_route(), which doesn't seem to handle things properly.  #### Debugging Data I'm attaching kamailio logs with debug=4, cfg_trace  #### Log Messages See attachments  #### SIP Traffic Please see: https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/d2643aae7f2a  ### Possible Solutions Using topoh instead for topos, but unfortunately this will break communication for other reasons (messages too large/UDP fragmentation for some peers). ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** Tried with kamailio 5.1.6 and kamailio 5.3.0-dev0 deb.kamailio.org repositories were used to acquire binaries for both versions * **Operating System**: Debian Stretch  [resubscribe.log](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/files/2586440/resubsc… -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1724 [View Less]

2 4

[kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine: stats for rtpengine command and reply from rtpengine (#1699)
by Surendra Tiwari 18 Nov '20

18 Nov '20

### Description rightnow, there is no stats about command sent to rtpengine and getting reply from rtpengine. There should be a stats that will tell that number of offer request sent: number of answer request sent: number of delete request sent: number of failed request for offer [after retry]: number of failed request for answer [after retry]: number of failed request for delete [after retry]: This will help to identify actual number of failed request.  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1699 [View Less]

2 2

[kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine module is not retrying for rtpengine_offer. retry is working for rtpengine_answer and rtpengine_delete (#1696)
by Surendra Tiwari 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

### Description we are using rtpengine with kamailio [KSR-LUA]. kamailio sending the rtpengine_offer to rtpengine. If kamailio didn't get the response from the rtpengine then it's not retrying . for rtpengine_answer and rtpengine_delete retry is working pretty good. we are using following rtpengine configuration # ----- rtpengine params ----- modparam("rtpengine", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("rtpengine", "table_name" , "rtpengine") modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_allow_op", 1) modparam("rtpengine", "queried_nodes_limit", 4) modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_retr", 2) modparam("rtpengine", "rtp_inst_pvar", "$avp(RTP_INSTANCE)") modparam("rtpengine", "setid_default", 1) modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_tout_ms", 400)  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction This issue can be reproduced by above configuration. and need to use rtpengine_offer,rtpengine_answer and rtpengine_delete with ksr lua routing.  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.1.4 (x86_64/linux) a1df59 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: a1df59 compiled on 06:23:23 Oct 30 2018 with gcc 4.8.4 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` root@ip-172-31-4-160:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Release: 14.04 Codename: trusty root@ip-172-31-4-160:~# uname -a Linux ip-172-31-4-160 3.13.0-143-generic #192-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 27 10:45:36 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1696 [View Less]

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] Active dialog stats stays static on a passive kamailio node that replicates dialogs via DMQ (#1692)
by Joel Serrano 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

### Description In a setup with 2 kamailios in active/passive with a virtual IP that failovers between them: sbc01 (active) is handling calls. sbc02 (passive) is started, and does an initial dialog sync via DMQ ``` root@sbc01:~# kamctl rpc stats.get_statistics all | grep dialog "dialog:active_dialogs = 39", "dialog:early_dialogs = 2", "dialog:expired_dialogs = 0", "dialog:failed_dialogs = 583", "dialog:processed_dialogs = 2527", root@sbc01:~# ``` ``` root@sbc02:/etc/… [View More]kamailio# kamctl rpc stats.get_statistics all | grep dialog "dialog:active_dialogs = 39", "dialog:early_dialogs = 0", "dialog:expired_dialogs = 0", "dialog:failed_dialogs = 0", "dialog:processed_dialogs = 0", root@sbc02:/etc/kamailio# ``` >From that point onwards, as long as sbc01 stays as active, sbc02 stays as passive, and no restarts occur anywhere, the values for `dialog` metrics in sbc02 will not change and remain as they are, in the previous example, active_dialogs would remain as 39. ### Troubleshooting This was discovered during some tests from #1591 #### Reproduction Setup 2 kamailio instances that replicate dialogs via DMQ. 1- On Kamailio1 put some traffic to have some active dialogs (must call `dlg_manage()` in routing script for these test calls) 2- Start Kamailio2 3- Compare output of: `kamcmd stats.get_statistics dialog:` on both nodes. 4- Alter the amount of active dialogs on Kamailio1 (either end some or create new ones). 5- Repeat step 3. Kamailio1 --> Step5 will have different values from Step3. Kamailio2 --> Step5 will have exactly the same values from Step3. ### Possible Solutions `dialog:active_dialogs` should remain as 0 on Kamailio2, as technically there are no dialogs being handled by that server, it only has information of replicated dialogs and those stats are available in the `dlg.stats_active` metric. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` # kamailio -V version: kamailio 5.2.0-pre1 (x86_64/linux) 2ecf60-dirty flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 2ecf60 -dirty compiled with gcc 6.3.0 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` root@sbc02:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch) Release: 9.5 Codename: stretch root@sbc02:~# uname -a Linux sbc02 4.9.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u6 (2018-10-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux root@sbc02:~# ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1692 [View Less]

2 2

[kamailio] Anyone thinking about adding JWT (JSON Web Token) support to Kamailio (#29)
by mading087 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

It seems a good idea to support JWT as a new SIP authorization method. Wonder if anyone is interested? Think auth_db would be the best spot to add support for JWT. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/29

12 24

[kamailio/kamailio] 180 Ringing without Contact with TOPOS enabled (#1720)
by Sergey Basov 05 Jun '20

05 Jun '20

### Description Kamailio with TOPOS enabled acts as a proxy between SIP client and SBC. When client sends "180 Ringing" without Contact header - kamailio does not forward it to SBC. If Contact header exists in "180 Ringing" - all works as expected. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Load and configure topos module Make call with "180 Ringing" without Contact header - kamailio will not forward it. #### Log Messages ``` ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:340]: tps_storage_link_msg(): bad sip … [View More]

5 19

[kamailio/kamailio] [Feature Request] Python3 compatibility for dbtextdb (#1747)
by Anthony Messina 04 May '20

04 May '20

kamctl's dbtextdb.py fails to build in a Python3-only environment. Update dbtextdb to Python3. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1747

4 12

[kamailio/kamailio] Support for 192.0.0.0/29 as NATed source (#1488)
by dtryba 07 Apr '20

07 Apr '20

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [X] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [X] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  192.0.0.0/29 is a reserved subnet for NATtin IPv4 across an IPv6 netwerk. For example Dual Stack Lite carrier grade NAT. This is small change and updates the subnets used for NAT according to https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-speci… You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1488 -- Commit Summary -- * Support for -- File Changes -- M src/modules/ipops/detailed_ip_type.c (1) M src/modules/ipops/detailed_ip_type.h (2) M src/modules/nat_traversal/nat_traversal.c (3) M src/modules/nathelper/nathelper.c (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1488.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1488.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1488 [View Less]

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] app_python warning about strict-aliasing (#1249)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Mar '20

12 Mar '20

Tracking here the issue exposed by @linuxmaniac via PR #924, as it was merged and then reverted (by #1248), so anyone can be aware of as well as comment/propose solutions for it. > Add "-fno-strict-aliasing" to compilation flags > > Fixes a slew of: > "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" > warnings from GCC for lines of the form: > Py_INCREF(Py_True); > and > Py_INCREF(Py_False); > > due to the cast … [View More]

1 2

[kamailio/kamailio] db_check_table_version(): invalid version 6 for table subscriber found, expected 7 (check table structure and table "version") (#1270)
by abell-star 30 Jan '20

30 Jan '20

kamailio version：5.0.1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1270

6 9

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
31
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev January 2019