sr-dev September 2019

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

24 participants
368 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] cfgt: doesn't support tm_suspend() tm_continue() (#684)

by Victor Seva

Actual implementation doesn't work with async. Need to investigate how to support it --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/684

10 months

[kamailio/kamailio] dialog: failover database loading behaviour in shared DB scenario, expiration of dialogs (#2080)

by Henning Westerholt

The dialog module will expire dialogs that don't actually belong to the particular proxy. Scenario: 2 proxies on 5.2.4 with a loadbalancer in front. Call was routed over proxy1, dialog timeout on proxy2 was shorter (to make it easier to reproduce it). The results: * Dialog synchronized with DMQ: proxy 2 would timeout the dialog * Dialog entry synchronized to proxy2 DB and proxy2 restarted: Proxy2 would timeout the dialog * Dialog entry synchronized to proxy2 DB and proxy2 not restarted: Proxy2 would _not_ timeout the dialog (I’ve tried both db_mode 1 and 2) So the proxy2 would load the dialog into memory and then later expire it. So timeout routes, send_bye on timeout would not work correctly. One idea to solve this would be to check e.g. over the existing socket data if the dialog belongs to this proxy and skip loading it in this case. This could be also made configurable e.g. with a module parameter. Any comments? Better ideas how to solve it? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2080

10 months

[kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc not replicating contact attributes (#1968)

by pwakano

### Description  The dmq_usrloc module is not replicating the extra attributes saved in the xavp for the contact. So remote nodes don't receive these values, being unable to access it properly. It is expected that the attributes are replicated as well. #### Reproduction  Setup two nodes using the dmq_usrloc and usrloc in db_mode=0. When receiving a REGISTER, before saving the contact add some attribute in the xavp_contact. In a subsequent message to this contact (e.g.: INVITE) use a lookup() or registered() and try to access the desired xavp_contact attribute. If the request is received in the local node (which received the original REGISTER), the attribute will be valid, but if the request is received in the remote node, the attribute is empty. #### Log Messages  ``` May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: registrar [save.c:410]: pack_ci(): generated ruid is: uloc-5cee2114-5abe-2 May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:73]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: <core> [core/xavp.c:697]: xavp_clone_level_nodata(): cloned root xavp [ulattrs] May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: <core> [core/xavp.c:721]: xavp_clone_level_nodata(): cloned inner xavp [cluster_node] May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1701]: update_ucontact(): exists callback for type= UL_CONTACT_UPDATE May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:84]: run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7f51b624d418, callback type 2/15, id 1 entered May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:776]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=2 May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:427]: init_usrloc_dmq_recv(): Initializing usrloc_dmq_recv for pid (23230) May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:785]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Replicating local update to other nodes... May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:746]: usrloc_dmq_send_contact(): sending serialized data {"action":1,"aor":"345671002","ruid":"uloc-5cee20df-5953-1","c":"sip:345671002@172.28.128.200:5060;rinstance=38e53fed7e84e081;transport=UDP","received":"","path":"<sip:172.28.128.102:5060;received=sip:172.28.128.200:5060;lr>","callid":"NOeeFh1Bh5JR0eJG8DENkg..","user_agent":"Z 3.15.40006 rv2.8.20","instance":"","expires":1559110577,"cseq":12,"flags":0,"cflags":3072,"q":-1,"last_modified":1559109977,"methods":4294967295,"reg_id":0,"server_id":0} May 29 16:06:18 kamailio-2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23230]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:315]: usrloc_dmq_send(): sending dmq broadcast... ``` ### Possible Solutions  Only workaround seems to use usrloc with db_mode=3 and then not use the dmq_usrloc, having the usrloc with attributes info shared via the DB.... ### Additional Information Kamailio 5.2.2 installed from the repo. ``` # kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.2.2 (x86_64/linux) 67f967 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 67f967 compiled on 11:40:41 Mar 11 2019 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` # cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) # uname -a Linux kamailio-2 3.10.0-514.21.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 20 12:24:47 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1968

10 months, 1 week

[kamailio/kamailio] Using PATH makes nathelper to send the SIP ping to itself (#2011)

by pwakano

### Description When using the PATH header option to keep track of original Kamailio node that received the REGISTER, if nathelper is also used with SIP ping enabled, the SIP OPTIONS is sent to itself following the PATH header and not sent directly to the destination. The nathelper/user location modules should have a flag similar to the "path_check_local" of the registrar module, which is meant to avoid looping the message to itself in case the next hop pointed by the PATH header is "myself".  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Configure the registrar module to support PATH and before saving the contact info add the PATH header with the local Kamailio information. Also make sure to have the nathelper and usrloc modules configured to send the keepalive SIP OPTIONS to the registered extensions. By the time the SIP OPTIONS is sent, Kamailio sends to itself, then the message has to be loose_route'd to the final destination. This could be avoided by having the nathelper module to identify the next hop is Kamailio itself skipping this destination as a call to "lookup()" does for the registrar module when the flag path_check_local is true.  #### SIP Traffic  172.128.128.10 is the Kamailio IP and 172.128.128.20 is the extension IP ``` 11:51:07.224713 IP (tos 0x60, ttl 64, id 64497, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 518) 172.128.128.10.5060 > 172.128.128.10.5060: SIP, length: 490 OPTIONS sip:345671002@172.128.128.20:5060;rinstance=d1eb3444a5cec5a1;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.128.128.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2540713 Route: <sip:172.128.128.10:5060;received=sip:172.128.128.20:5060;lr;cluster_node=192.168.156.10:5060> From: sip:sbc@mydomain.com;tag=uloc-5d2e6499-2fb5-1-0-c15309d2 To: sip:345671002@172.128.128.20:5060;rinstance=d1eb3444a5cec5a1;transport=UDP Call-ID: 40ee1573-7506bba3-5e30c05(a)172.128.128.10 CSeq: 1 OPTIONS Content-Length: 0 11:51:07.226132 IP (tos 0x60, ttl 64, id 44359, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 502) 172.128.128.10.5060 > 172.128.128.20.5060: SIP, length: 474 OPTIONS sip:345671002@172.128.128.20:5060;rinstance=d1eb3444a5cec5a1;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.128.128.10;branch=z9hG4bKb958.b807e80b742db62504a45220d8f0e974.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.128.128.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2540713 From: sip:sbc@mydomain.com;tag=uloc-5d2e6499-2fb5-1-0-c15309d2 To: sip:345671002@172.128.128.20:5060;rinstance=d1eb3444a5cec5a1;transport=UDP Call-ID: 40ee1573-7506bba3-5e30c05(a)172.128.128.10 CSeq: 1 OPTIONS Content-Length: 0 11:51:07.303474 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 10816, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 786) 172.128.128.20.5060 > 172.128.128.10.5060: SIP, length: 758 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.128.128.10;branch=z9hG4bKb958.b807e80b742db62504a45220d8f0e974.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.128.128.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2540713 Contact: <sip:172.128.128.20:5060> To: <sip:345671002@172.128.128.20:5060;rinstance=d1eb3444a5cec5a1;transport=UDP>;tag=bb0c1f2d From: sip:sbc@mydomain.com;tag=uloc-5d2e6499-2fb5-1-0-c15309d2 Call-ID: 40ee1573-7506bba3-5e30c05(a)172.128.128.10 CSeq: 1 OPTIONS Accept: application/sdp, application/sdp Accept-Language: en Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE Supported: replaces, norefersub, extended-refer, timer, outbound, path, X-cisco-serviceuri User-Agent: Z 3.15.40006 rv2.8.20 Allow-Events: presence, kpml, talk Content-Length: 0 11:51:07.306821 IP (tos 0x60, ttl 64, id 64570, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 727) 172.128.128.10.5060 > 172.128.128.10.5060: SIP, length: 699 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.128.128.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2540713 Contact: <sip:172.128.128.20:5060;alias=172.128.128.20~5060~1> To: <sip:345671002@172.128.128.20:5060;rinstance=d1eb3444a5cec5a1;transport=UDP>;tag=bb0c1f2d From: sip:sbc@mydomain.com;tag=uloc-5d2e6499-2fb5-1-0-c15309d2 Call-ID: 40ee1573-7506bba3-5e30c05(a)172.128.128.10 CSeq: 1 OPTIONS Accept: application/sdp, application/sdp Accept-Language: en Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE Supported: replaces, norefersub, extended-refer, timer, outbound, path, X-cisco-serviceuri User-Agent: Z 3.15.40006 rv2.8.20 Allow-Events: presence, kpml, talk Content-Length: 0 ``` ### Possible Solutions  Not found. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` # kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.2.2 (x86_64/linux) 67f967 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 67f967 compiled on 11:40:41 Mar 11 2019 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` # uname -a Linux kamailio-1 3.10.0-514.21.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 20 12:24:47 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2011

10 months, 1 week

[kamailio/kamailio] unistr.h: No such file or directory (#2020)

by stefan.wen

10 months, 2 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] Kemi API xlog doesn't support log_facility configuration (#2064)

by adil-mafzool

12 months

[kamailio/kamailio] CDP / IMS Diameter Server Module- diameter_request() function fails to send/forward request (#2035)

by Nick

Hi Kamailio team, I'm attempting to use Kamailio as a Diameter Routing Agent, but I can't seem to get the diameter_request() function to actually _send_ the diameter request, instead I get a warning about no JSON Response: > WARNING: ims_diameter_server [avp_helper.c:341]: addAVPsfromJSON(): No JSON Response Even when relaying received data without modifying it. I posted this issue on the mailing list but have had no responses. Since then I've run a bunch more tests on a few different versions of Kamailio with a few different Diameter peers with the same result. ### Description The IMS Diameter Server Module's[ diameter_request() function](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/ims_diameter_… fails to send, reporting "No JSON Response" even when fed unmodified received data into it. ### Troubleshooting Initially I was trying to use CDP & IMS Diameter Server Module to create & send Diameter messages, I thought my formatting in the message (the Diameter Message (as JSON)) was incorrect. as I was getting: > WARNING: ims_diameter_server [avp_helper.c:341]: addAVPsfromJSON(): No JSON Response When trying to send the request. To rule out my JSON formatting being the issue I configured two Diameter Peers in Kamailio: >From one Diameter peer, I sent a Diameter request to Kamailio. Kamailio is configured to receive the Diameter request, and without modifying the message body ($diameter_request), put that message into the message of the the diameter_request() so as to rule out formatting errors in the message, just a relay of the message, but this also fails to send. I also included a series of checks to confirm the peer to receive the relayed message was online and capable of handling the specified Diameter application, all of which passed. I've defined the peers in the diametercfg.xml config file, and they're all showing as online when I do a "kamcmd cdp.list_peers": FQDN: ims-hss.localdomain Details: { State: I_Open Disabled: False Last used: 0 Applications: { appid:vendorid: 16777216:10415 appid:vendorid: 16777216:4491 appid:vendorid: 16777216:13019 appid:vendorid: 16777216:0 appid:vendorid: 16777217:10415 appid:vendorid: 16777221:10415 } } Here's a simplified version of my event_route[diameter:request], showing I simply receive the diameter request and then try to send it straight back out using the diameter_request() function: ``` event_route[diameter:request]{ xlog("Got diameter message"); diameter_request("ims-hss.localdomain", $diameter_application, $diameter_command, $diameter_request); xlog("Forwarded Diameter Request"); } ``` When tailing syslog I see the "Got diameter message" entry but not the "Forwarded Diameter Request", which suggests it's not getting past the diameter_request(), instead I just see the: > WARNING: ims_diameter_server [avp_helper.c:341]: addAVPsfromJSON(): No JSON Response Packet captures show Kamailio receives the request but never relays it. The source of avp_helper.c shows the warning is called if the length of the JSON is <= 0, but as I'm feeding back out what I've received it shouldn't be 0, an no recent major changes to the source, so I'm stumped as to why it's catching this. I've attached a full copy of the config files below. #### Reproduction I've tried this with a few different Diameter servers, but I can reproduce it with two FreeDIAMETER peers configured in Diameter CDP Config XML, I've also tried with one Kamailio CDP based peer and using xhttp to call the diameter_request() function with the same results. #### Log Messages Copy of relevant SysLog: https://pastebin.com/ZY8z2kd4 ### Additional Information Full Kamailio Config: https://pastebin.com/afgqUfWr Diameter CDP Config XML: https://pastebin.com/bVrBG8mG Relevant Syslog: https://pastebin.com/ZY8z2kd4 Kamcmd cdp.list_peers: https://pastebin.com/cKi4JAHC Kamailio 5.1.2 on Ubuntu 18.04 installed from Repos. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2035

12 months

[kamailio/kamailio] mod pua (dialoginfo) etag race conditions (#2048)

by Laszlo

I'm observing the following scenario: * mod_dialog callbacks trigger 2 or more times (nearly) simultaneously for the same dialog * pua_dialoginfo sends PUBLISH 1, referencing etag A * pua_dialoginfo sends PUBLISH 2, referencing etag A * presence_dialoginfo processes PUBLISH 1, replies with new etag B * presence_dialoginfo processes PUBLISH 2, replies with a 412 (because etag A no longer exists) * pua_dialoginfo receives the 412 and re-tries it as PUBLISH 3 ("sent a PUBLISH within a dialog that no longer exists, send again an intial PUBLISH") * presence_dialoginfo processes PUBLISH 3, and may or may not accept it The situation as described is not ideal since it'll fill up your logs with errors, but isn't critical per se. Much more problematic is when there are more than 2 PUBLISHes generated for the same dialog simultaneously, as this can cause a (near) infinite race between the various PUBLISH requests all fighting to update the same etag. For example, 10 PUBLISH are sent out for etag A; all but one are rejected with a 412; then the other 9 keep on bouncing back and forth between pua_dialoginfo and presence_dialoginfo because they do not share the same view on the dialog's latest etag. Even worse is when presence_dialoginfo is rejecting *all* incoming PUBLISHes with a 412, for example because of a database/memory/replication problem or a malformed request. A `t_reply("412", "Not today")` in the presence_dialoginfo server, combined with a single PUBLISH from pua_dialoginfo is enough to reproducibly brick the pua_dialoginfo server because it runs into critical memory fragmentation levels. I think there are multiple ways to fix or alleviate this problem. ## pua generic * pua (publ_cback_func) should not retry 412-failed PUBLISHes indefinitely, but e.g. at most once * pua should not generate simultaneous PUBLISHes for the same presentity. It should delay PUBLISH 2 until PUBLISH 1 is either (permanently) accepted or rejected; or it should discard PUBLISH 2 immediately when it is generated. * Perhaps make handling of 412 replies more fine-grained. Currently every 412 reply is handled like this ("sent a PUBLISH within a dialog that no longer exists"), while that statement doesn't apply to all possible 412 replies. ## pua_dialoginfo specific * pua_dialoginfo currently subscribes to a lot of mod_dialog callbacks. For example subscribing to both DLGCB_CONFIRMED and DLGCB_CONFIRMED_NA will always get you two (rapidly succeeding) PUBLISHes with exactly the same contents. Subscribing to DLGCB_REQ_WITHIN means you'll get a new PUBLISH for every re-INVITE such as hold/unhold or codec negotiation, which is useless in many usecases. It would be helpful to allow configuring pua_dialoginfo with a list of callbacks to subscribe to. * With or without a smaller set of mod_dialog callbacks, pua_dialoginfo can generate multiple PUBLISH requests with exactly the same contents. Since pua is aware of the (last) state that it published for the presentity, it could compare if the newly generated PUBLISH is any different from the last known state, and discard it if it's not. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2048

12 months

[kamailio/kamailio] kamctl - shell interpreter selection (#2019)

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

### Description The `kamctl` tool seems to require `bash`, while trying to use `/bin/sh`, which can point to `dash` or other shell interpreters. For example, the output of `kamdbctl create`: ``` MySQL password for root: -e \E[37;33mINFO: creating database kamailio_simple_db ... -e \E[37;33mINFO: granting privileges to database kamailio_simple_db ... -e \E[37;33mINFO: creating standard tables into kamailio_simple_db ... -e \E[37;33mINFO: Core Kamailio tables succesfully created. Install presence related tables? (y/n): n /usr/sbin/kamdbctl: 216: /usr/sbin/kamdbctl: Bad substitution ``` It seems that the issue is expanding the variable when getting the answer for y/n question: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/utils/kamctl/kamdbctl.base… Such expression seems to be specific for bash: * https://mywiki.wooledge.org/Bashism ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Run `kamctl` with `/bin/sh` pointing to `bash`. ### Possible Solutions Decide what to do to have an acceptable solution: enforce `bash`, remove bashisms`... Or maybe focus to make `kamcli` a (full) replacement for `kamctl/kamdbctl` and get rid of those old-style shell/bash scripts: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamcli -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2019

12 months

[kamailio/kamailio] EVAPI: Better ability to remove dead clients (#1880)

by weili-jiang

### Description If an EVAPI client drops dead and silently closes its TCP connection, EVAPI is not notified in an acceptable time frame. The default OS TCP keep-alive parameters are generally far too long to be effective, and there is no way to override these using module or runtime configuration. Moreover, any attempts to put in a workaround is thwarted by the inability to close an arbitrary EVAPI connection from say, a timer event (since there is no way to specify a connection to close outside the EVAPI context). ### Expected behavior When an EVAPI client goes dead, the connection should be closed in the order of seconds (ideally configurable). The EVAPI should allow connections to be closed via scripting from any context. #### Actual observed behavior When an EVAPI client goes dead, the connection stays open (counting towards the maximum number of allowed clients). When the evapi_close is invoked from other contexts, nothing happens. #### Debugging Data #### Log Messages #### SIP Traffic ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.2.1 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 6.3.0 ``` * **Operating System**: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) ``` Linux 3b83b180f7c9 4.15.0-45-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29 16:28:13 UTC 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1880

12 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev September 2019