sr-dev June 2021

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

15 participants
314 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] app_lua: build warning (#2728)
by sergey-safarov 29 Jan '22

29 Jan '22

``` which: no lua-config in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin) which: no lua-config in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin) CC (gcc) [M app_lua.so] app_lua_api.o app_lua_api.c: In function 'lua_sr_kemi_register_libs': app_lua_api.c:1942:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'luaL_openlib'; did you mean 'luaL_openlibs'? [-Wimplicit-f unction-declaration] 1942 | luaL_openlib(L, "KSR", _sr_crt_KSRMethods, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | luaL_openlibs CC (gcc) [M app_lua.so] app_lua_kemi_export.o CC (gcc) [M app_lua.so] app_lua_mod.o LD (gcc) [M app_lua.so] app_lua.so which: no lua-config in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin) which: no lua-config in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin) CC (gcc) [M app_lua_sr.so] app_lua_sr_api.o app_lua_sr_api.c: In function 'lua_sr_core_openlibs': app_lua_sr_api.c:1614:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'luaL_openlib'; did you mean 'luaL_openlibs'? [-Wimplici t-function-declaration] 1614 | luaL_openlib(L, "sr", _sr_core_Map, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | luaL_openlibs CC (gcc) [M app_lua_sr.so] app_lua_sr_exp.o app_lua_sr_exp.c: In function 'lua_sr_exp_openlibs': app_lua_sr_exp.c:3686:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'luaL_openlib'; did you mean 'luaL_openlibs'? [-Wimplici t-function-declaration] 3686 | luaL_openlib(L, "sr.sl", _sr_sl_Map, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | luaL_openlibs CC (gcc) [M app_lua_sr.so] app_lua_sr_mod.o LD (gcc) [M app_lua_sr.so] app_lua_sr.so ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2728

2 10

[kamailio/kamailio] server crashes every 10 hours (#2101)
by ekke56 14 Jan '22

14 Jan '22

### Description  ### Troubleshooting coredump data below. #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (gdb) bt full #0 0x000000000046ccdd in get_hash1_raw (s=0x5da51296 <Address 0x5da51296 out of bounds>, len=9) at core/hashes.h:109 p = 0x5da51296 <Address 0x5da51296 out of bounds> v = 4100353960 h = 0 #1 0x000000000046cfb6 in str_hash_get (ht=0xa6d6c0 <cnts_hash_table>, key=0x5da51296 <Address 0x5da51296 out of bounds>, len=9) at core/str_hash.h:94 h = 0 e = 0x19 #2 0x000000000046debe in cnt_hash_lookup (group=0x7ffc2db9d7c0, name=0x7eff79693b80) at core/counters.c:420 e = 0x7eff80c48c88 first = 0xbd8191bc2e950d55 cnt_rec = 0x7eff80c48cb0 #3 0x000000000046e752 in counter_lookup_str (handle=0x7ffc2db9d7d0, group=0x7ffc2db9d7c0, name=0x7eff79693b80) at core/counters.c:541 cnt_rec = 0x19 #4 0x00007eff7d65b447 in get_stat (name=0x7eff79693b80) at ../../core/counters.h:197 h = {id = 13} grp = {s = 0x0, len = 0} #5 0x00007eff7d65c113 in statsc_svalue (name=0x7eff79693b80, res=0x7eff79693f4b) at statsc_mod.c:149 stat = 0xd __FUNCTION__ = "statsc_svalue" #6 0x00007eff7d65db79 in statsc_timer (ticks=113205942, param=0x0) at statsc_mod.c:274 sm = 0x7eff79693b70 tn = 1571099286 n = 115 __FUNCTION__ = "statsc_timer" #7 0x00000000005db7f9 in sr_wtimer_exec (ticks=113205942, param=0x0) at core/timer_proc.c:390 wt = 0x7eff80c56f48 wn = 0x0 wp = 0x0 cs = 0 __FUNCTION__ = "sr_wtimer_exec" #8 0x00000000005daa29 in fork_sync_timer (child_id=-1, desc=0x7c8a71 "secondary timer", make_sock=1, f=0x5db4f2 <sr_wtimer_exec>, param=0x0, interval=1000) at core/timer_proc.c:224 pid = 0 ts1 = 1811295077 ts2 = 1000 #9 0x00000000005dbb26 in sr_wtimer_start () at core/timer_proc.c:416 __FUNCTION__ = "sr_wtimer_start" #10 0x0000000000425a33 in main_loop () at main.c:1729 i = 8 pid = 3615 si = 0x0 si_desc = "udp receiver child=7 sock=91.216.86.57:5060\000\377~\000\000@۹-\374\177\000\000\020\207A\000\000\000\000\000\020\336\271-\374\177\000\000\323c{\000\000\000\000\000\031\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\000\000\200\000\000\000\000\000__:\201\377~\000\000\250\346\260v\377~\000\000\270\314À\377~\000" nrprocs = 8 woneinit = 1 __FUNCTION__ = "main_loop" #11 0x000000000042c72a in main (argc=7, argv=0x7ffc2db9def8) at main.c:2696 cfg_stream = 0x1ee3010 c = -1 r = 0 tmp = 0x7ffc2db9ef2c "" tmp_len = 0 port = 0 proto = 0 options = 0x76a9a0 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:" ret = -1 ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- info locals seed = 2620966285 rfd = 4 debug_save = 0 debug_flag = 0 dont_fork_cnt = 0 n_lst = 0x2 p = 0x0 st = {st_dev = 20, st_ino = 22346, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16832, st_uid = 0, st_gid = 0, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 40, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1568107728, tv_nsec = 458000000}, st_mtim = { tv_sec = 1571064422, tv_nsec = 57000000}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1571064422, tv_nsec = 57000000}, __unused = {0, 0, 0}} __FUNCTION__ = "main" (gdb) list 104 register unsigned v; 105 register unsigned h; 106 107 h=0; 108 109 hash_update_str(s, s+len, p, v, h); 110 return hash_finish(h); 111 } 112 113 ``` #### Log Messages  ``` no relevant messages ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` seems to be triggered by internal timer ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.2.4 (x86_64/linux) 759867 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 759867 compiled on 12:20:22 Sep 11 2019 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) Linux xxx 3.10.0-957.12.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 14 21:24:32 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2101

3 20

[kamailio/kamailio] Infinity read from closed socket (#2658)
by sergey-safarov 13 Jan '22

13 Jan '22

### Description I observing a case when Kamailio stop processing calls. What is found: *Lot of connections with CLOSE_WAIT state* ``` [root@sbc-13 ~]# netstat -anp | grep 5060 tcp 129 0 100.85.118.66:5060 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 56907/kamailio tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:21929 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:32738 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:39084 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:28843 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:57939 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:27823 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:15820 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 0 0 100.85.118.66:5060 207.244.110.239:11587 ESTABLISHED 56907/kamailio tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:11972 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:57245 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:54344 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:41416 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:3644 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:61657 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:49325 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:65334 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:48657 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:1612 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:7879 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:56626 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:57247 CLOSE_WAIT - tcp 153 0 100.85.118.66:5060 3.101.84.132:30494 CLOSE_WAIT - ``` At this time on two core server, one core loaded 100% and another core is free. And top show ``` %Cpu(s): 29.4 us, 26.5 sy ``` As about 26% CPU cycles proceed kernel call, using `strace` utility I found Kamailio process (with top CSP usage) continusly make thus kernel calls. ``` recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) recvfrom(58, 0x7ffdb46a5ab0, 232, MSG_PEEK, NULL, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) ``` *Then I check 58 process file descriptor* ``` [root@sbc-13 ~]# ls -la /proc/56907/fd/58 lrwx------. 1 kamailio kamailio 64 Mar 3 10:49 /proc/56907/fd/58 -> 'socket:[3931924]' ``` *Info about open socket* ``` [root@sbc-13 ~]# lsof -a -p 56907| grep 3931924 kamailio 56907 kamailio 58u IPv4 3931924 0t0 TCP ip-100-85-118-66.us-west-1.compute.internal:sip->207.244.110.239:11495 (ESTABLISHED) ``` *Info about Kamailio 56907 process* ``` [root@sbc-13 ~]# kamcmd core.ps | tail 56903 tcp receiver (generic) child=4 56904 tcp receiver (generic) child=5 56905 tcp receiver (generic) child=6 56906 tcp receiver (generic) child=7 56907 tcp main process ``` Then using gdb I have created core file and back trace here ``` (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007f07d3639b1e in recv () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0000000000528817 in tcpconn_read_haproxy (c=0x7f07ce98d930) at core/tcp_main.c:953 bytes = -1 retval = 0 size = 3454406656 port = 32519 p = 0x7ef068 "" end = 0x7f07d335c4c0 <syslog> "\363\017\036\372H\201\354", <incomplete sequence \330> src_ip = 0x6e9646 <qm_shm_malloc+103> dst_ip = 0x7ffdb46a5c20 v2sig = "\r\n\r\n\000\r\nQUIT\n" hdr = {v1 = {line = "\300\304\065\323\004", '\000' <repeats 11 times>, "\370ؘ\316\004\000\000\000t\251\205\000\000\000\000\000\320[j\264\375\177\000\000\004\331m\000\000\000\000\000\320[j\264\375\177\000\000\306\331m\000\000\000\000\000\b\342u\316\a\177\000\000\000\020\346\315\a\177\000\000\367b\201\000\000\000\000\000y\251\205\000n\004\000\000\260\235\201\000\000\000\000\000\247\227\201"}, v2 = {sig = "\300\304\065\323\004\000\000\000\000\000\000", ver_cmd = 0 '\000', fam = 0 '\000', len = 0, addr = {ip4 = {src_addr = 3466123512, dst_addr = 4, src_port = 43380, dst_port = 133}, ip6 = {src_addr = "\370ؘ\316\004\000\000\000t\251\205\000\000\000\000", dst_addr = "\320[j\264\375\177\000\000\004\331m\000\000\000\000", src_port = 23504, dst_port = 46186}, unx = {src_addr = "\370ؘ\316\004\000\000\000t\251\205\000\000\000\000\000\320[j\264\375\177\000\000\004\331m\000\000\000\000\000\320[j\264\375\177\000\000\306\331m\000\000\000\000\000\b\342u\316\a\177\000\000\000\020\346\315\a\177\000\000\367b\201\000\000\000\000\000y\251\205\000n\004\000\000\260\235\201\000\000\000\000\000\247\227\201\000\000\000\000\000\240C\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\020\346", <incomplete sequence \315>, dst_addr = "\a\177\000\000PB\226\316\a\177\000\000\000\020\346\315\a\177\000\000\274\332\366\312\a\177\000\000Ȧ\351͗\002\000\000\240\370\366\312\a\177\000\000S\342\366\312\a\177\000\000@\342u\316\a\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000P\225\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\003\000\000\000\001\b\000\000\300[j\264\375\177\000\000R\031Q\000\000\000\000\000hV\313\322\a\177\000"}}}} __func__ = "tcpconn_read_haproxy" #2 0x0000000000529cc8 in tcpconn_new (sock=58, su=0x7ffdb46a5e00, local_addr=0x7f07d2cb5668, ba=0x7f07d2cb5610, type=2, state=3) at core/tcp_main.c:1164 c = 0x7f07ce98d930 rd_b_size = 16384 ret = 32519 __func__ = "tcpconn_new" #3 0x000000000055194e in handle_new_connect (si=0x7f07d2cb5610) at core/tcp_main.c:4259 su = {s = {sa_family = 2, sa_data = ",\347\317\364n\357\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, sin = {sin_family = 2, sin_port = 59180, sin_addr = {s_addr = 4017026255}, sin_zero = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 2, sin6_port = 59180, sin6_flowinfo = 4017026255, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000h\360~\000\000\000\000", __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 61544, 126, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 8319080, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 67108864}, sas = {ss_family = 2, __ss_padding = ",\347\317\364n\357\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000h\360~\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\360^j\264\375\177\000\000\023FU\000\000\000\000\000\230_\226\316\a\177\000\000\300\225\264\000\000\000\000\000\377\377\377\377\001\000\000\000\060٘\316\a\177\000\000\060٘\316\a\177\000\000\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\220^j\264\375\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\300\304\065\323\a\177\000", __ss_align = 8235966803625406752}} sock_name = {s = {sa_family = 23984, sa_data = "j\264\375\177\000\000\376\023Q\000\000\000\000"}, sin = {sin_family = 23984, sin_port = 46186, sin_addr = {s_addr = 32765}, sin_zero = "\376\023Q\000\000\000\000"}, sin6 = {sin6_family = 23984, sin6_port = 46186, sin6_flowinfo = 32765, sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = "\376\023Q\000\000\000\000\000\310ژ\316\a\177\000", __u6_addr16 = {5118, 81, 0, 0, 56008, 52888, 32519, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {5313534, 0, 3466123976, 32519}}}, sin6_scope_id = 3454980136}, sas = {ss_family = 23984, __ss_padding = "j\264\375\177\000\000\376\023Q\000\000\000\000\000\310ژ\316\a\177\000\000(\320\356\315\a\177\000\000\030\"\202\000_\376\377\377\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\300\304\065\323\a\177\000\000\363:\204\000\000\000\000\000h\360~\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\360^j\264\375\177\000\000\245\222T\000\000\000\000\000\250\376\314\322\002\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\002\000\000\000Dc\201\000\241\001\000", __ss_align = 0}} sock_name_len = 32519 dst_su = 0x7f07d2cb5668 tcpconn = 0xffffffffce98d930 su_len = 16 new_sock = 58 __func__ = "handle_new_connect" #4 0x0000000000554aac in handle_io (fm=0x7f07d2ccfa40, ev=1, idx=-1) at core/tcp_main.c:4517 ret = 16 __func__ = "handle_io" #5 0x000000000051c992 in io_wait_loop_epoll (h=0xaf4760 <io_h>, t=5, repeat=0) at core/io_wait.h:1070 n = 1 r = 0 fm = 0x7f07d2ccfa40 revents = 1 __func__ = "io_wait_loop_epoll" #6 0x000000000055800f in tcp_main_loop () at core/tcp_main.c:4808 si = 0x0 r = 8 __func__ = "tcp_main_loop" #7 0x000000000042ca0b in main_loop () at main.c:1788 i = 8 pid = 0 si = 0x0 si_desc = "udp receiver child=7 sock=[2600:1f1c:6d5:aa03::7]:5060\000\061\063\062:5060)\000\000\000\000\060\000\000\000\370bj\264\375\177\000\000\020bj\264\375\177\000\000\000\334ѯ\344lFߨE\201\000\000\000\000\000\250\203\306\322k\000\000\000\363:\204\000\000\000\000\000\270o\305\322\a\177\000" nrprocs = 8 woneinit = 1 __func__ = "main_loop" #8 0x0000000000435d95 in main (argc=11, argv=0x7ffdb46a6828) at main.c:2895 cfg_stream = 0x156b2a0 c = -1 r = 0 tmp = 0x7ffdb46a6ee3 "" tmp_len = 0 port = 0 proto = 0 ahost = 0x0 aport = 0 options = 0x7f1e48 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:" ret = -1 seed = 2702569434 rfd = 4 debug_save = 0 debug_flag = 0 dont_fork_cnt = 2 n_lst = 0x7ffdb46d4268 p = 0x7f07d3309db5 <handle_intel.constprop+197> "H\205\300uf\213t$\004M\215\216\244" st = {st_dev = 24, st_ino = 19244, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16832, st_uid = 985, st_gid = 979, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 40, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1613817804, tv_nsec = 114998890}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1614768566, tv_nsec = 7667804}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1614768566, tv_nsec = 7667804}, __glibc_reserved = {0, 0, 0}} tbuf = '\000' <repeats 16 times>, "\214\344'\323\a\177\000\000\330Am\264\375\177\000\000\000\000\000\000 ", '\000' <repeats 19 times>, "X_\376\323\a\177\000\000\000ej\264\375\177\000\000\a\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\020U\376\323\a\177\000\000\a\000\000\000\t\000\000\000\210\351 \324\a\177\000\000\034\021\377\323\a\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000H\037\377\323\a\177\000\000Pdj\264\375\177\000\000\260\344'\323\a\177\000\000\300\363\037\324\a\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\320dj\264\375\177", '\000' <repeats 26 times>, "\200W\376\323\a\177\000\000"... option_index = 12 long_options = {{name = 0x7f4056 "help", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 104}, {name = 0x7ef4e1 "version", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 118}, {name = 0x7f405b "alias", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1024}, {name = 0x7f4061 "subst", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1025}, {name = 0x7f4067 "substdef", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1026}, {name = 0x7f4070 "substdefs", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1027}, {name = 0x7f407a "server-id", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1028}, {name = 0x7f4084 "loadmodule", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1029}, {name = 0x7f408f "modparam", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1030}, {name = 0x7f4098 "log-engine", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1031}, {name = 0x7f40a3 "debug", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1032}, {name = 0x7f40a9 "cfg-print", has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 1033}, {name = 0x7f40b3 "atexit", has_arg = 1, flag = 0x0, val = 1034}, {name = 0x0, has_arg = 0, flag = 0x0, val = 0}} __func__ = "main" ``` We use enabled haproxy protocol. Loos as Kamailio does not properly close the socket when the socket closed on the client-side. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` [root@sbc-13 ~]# kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.5.0-dev4 (x86_64/linux) 06656a flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 06656a compiled on 04:01:58 Mar 1 2021 with gcc 8.3.1 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` [root@sbc-13 ~]# cat /etc/os-release NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="8" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="8" PLATFORM_ID="platform:el8" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 8" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:8" HOME_URL="https://centos.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-8" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="8" ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2658

3 9

[kamailio/kamailio] module_db_mysql: Allow '@' in username/password for db_url URIs (#1346)
by Florian Floimair 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [x] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  - It is allowed to use '@' within a username and/or a password for MySQL. Database as a Service providers like e.g. Microsoft Azure use these in usernames by default. The existing URI parser always treated the '@' as a separator between username:password and host:port/db parts of the URI. The parser now checks how many '@' characters are present in the URI and only treats the last occurence as separator for the host:port/db part. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1346 -- Commit Summary -- * module_db_mysql: Allow '@' in username/password for db_url URIs -- File Changes -- M src/modules/db_mysql/my_uri.c (35) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1346.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1346.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1346

2 4

[kamailio/kamailio] hostname in kubernetes (#2119)
by lazedo 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

### Description gethostname not accurate in kubernetes  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  on a recent test with kamailio in kubernetes, found that gethostname can return only the hostname and not the fqdn. this depends on the kind of object is used (deployment/statefulset) ### Possible Solutions  the below patch fixed the issues i was having ``` diff --git a/src/modules/ipops/ipops_pv.c b/src/modules/ipops/ipops_pv.c index 5f77aa9..f65b4dd 100644 --- a/src/modules/ipops/ipops_pv.c +++ b/src/modules/ipops/ipops_pv.c @@ -455,6 +455,11 @@ if (gethostname(hbuf, 512)<0) { LM_WARN("gethostname failed - host pvs will be null\n"); return -1; + } else { + struct hostent* h; + if((h = gethostbyname(hbuf)) != NULL) { + memcpy(hbuf, h->h_name, 512); + } } hlen = strlen(hbuf); ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` latest master ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` buster & centos7 ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2119

4 10

[kamailio/kamailio] erlang: getting null value in erl_xbuff in response of erl_rpc request (#2069)
by vipulpatel310 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

### Description **I did:** I have installed kamailio 5.2.4 in ubuntu system and configured kamailio script to connect with erlang node also it sends rpc request to erlang node and get response which I have printed in a logs. ... $erl_list(L) = "two"; $erl_list(L) = "one"; xlog("L_ALERT","Before RPC: $erl_list(args=>format)\n"); erl_rpc("erlang", "list_to_tuple", "$erl_list(args)", "$erl_xbuff(repl)"); xlogl("L_ALERT","type(reply): $erl_xbuff(repl=>type), format(repl): $erl_xbuff(repl=>format)\n"); ... **Expected to happen:** Response should be get from erlang node against RPC request and it should be store in erl_xbuff. And it should be print logs like: ALERT: <script>: 501:type(reply): tuple, format(repl): {"one", "two"} **Actually happened:** Response is getting properly. but the problem is to store data into xbuff so it print logs like: ALERT: <script>: 501:type(reply): <null>, format(repl): <null> ### Troubleshooting I have check with older version 4.3.0 and it works fine. getting this problem after 5.2.0 version So, I have compare 5.2.0 and 4.3.0 version code. I found one change in pv_xbuff.c file which is creating a problem when I revert the change then it works fine. #### Reproduction It will be reproducible everytime. Just sends rpc request and get the value in xbuff. check xbuff value #### Log Messages Problem logs: ``` ALERT: <script>: Before RPC: [["one", "two"]] WARNING: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:480]: qm_free(): WARNING: free(0) called from erlang: pv_xbuff.c: xavp_decode(1209) ALERT: <script>: 501:type(reply): <null>, format(repl): <null> ``` logs after change: ``` ALERT: <script>: Before RPC: [["one", "two"]] WARNING: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:480]: qm_free(): WARNING: free(0) called from erlang: pv_xbuff.c: xavp_decode(1209) ALERT: <script>: 501:type(reply): tuple, format(repl): {"one", "two"} ``` ### Possible Solutions revert the 6542a367638ec5f8a2b62994f8c309e7a2533962 commit. It will work fine ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.2.4 (x86_64/linux) 759867 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 759867 compiled on 11:52:55 Sep 4 2019 with gcc 7.4.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Release: 18.04 Codename: bionic Linux hostname.domain.com 4.15.0-20-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 24 06:16:15 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2069

2 3

[kamailio/kamailio] kamailio can't support send Rx_AAR for origin call (#1793)
by lsm808 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

Hi All, When kamailio(kamailio-5.0) receive 200 OK message, we need to send Rx_AAR for origin and term call. Rx_AAR("MT_aar_reply", "origin","",2); for origin call Rx_AAR("MT_aar_reply", "term","",2); for term call. But from source code ims_qos_mod.c, we see lots of part like below to not support for a request. Even we comments them, there are still lots of issues, could we support the scenarios like below: when kamailio receive 200 OK, we can send Rx_AAR for term and origin call. //We don't ever do AAR on request for calling scenario... if (msg->first_line.type != SIP_REPLY) { // Added by vlv // LM_DBG("Can't do AAR for call session in request\n"); // return result; } -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1793

2 4

[kamailio/kamailio] while passing different callid then actual for rtpengine_offer, rtpengine_answer and rtpengine_delete, rtpstats will not populate the stastics of rtpengine (#1788)
by Surendra Tiwari 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

### Description  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1788

2 4

[kamailio/kamailio] siptrace: option ping from nathelper do not get duplicated (#1722)
by Roman Dissauer 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

### Description when using kamailio with mod siptrace in trace mode, option pings from nathelper module and tls encrypted packets do not get duplicated ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  version: kamailio 5.1.6 (x86_64/linux) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 0) modparam("siptrace", "trace_mode", 1) modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri", "sip:10.1.1.1:5888") when listening on sip:10.1.1.1:5888 all the duplicated sip packets arrive except option pings from nathelper and tls encrypted traffic (which should then be already decrypted by kamailio) ### Possible Solutions  seems that core triggers are not evaluated when using tls or nathelper option pings ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.1.6 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 6.3.0 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` Linux AT1LKAM04 4.9.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u6 (2018-10-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1722

3 8

[kamailio/kamailio] evapi: if there is no evapi clients are connected to kamailio, evapi trying to send data. (#1700)
by Surendra Tiwari 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

### Description right now, evapi module trying to send data even if no clients are connected .in the case new transaction is created and even suspended also. kamailio should not create the transaction if no evapi client is connected to kamailio.  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1700

2 3

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
32
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev June 2021