sr-dev December 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

17 participants
349 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] Memory usage increases everytime tls.reload is executed (Issue #3823)
by Sebastian Denz 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

### Description We are using Kamailio 5.7.4 on Debian 12 (from http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio57) with rtpengine as an Edgeproxy for our clients. The instance terminates SIP/TLS (with Cliencertificates) and forwards the SIP Traffic to internal systems. After some days we are getting errors like this `tls_complete_init(): tls: ssl bug #1491 workaround: not enough memory for safe operation: shm=7318616 threshold1=8912896` First we thought Kamailio just doesnt have enough memory, so we doubled it.. But after some days the Logmessage (and Userissues) occured again. So we monitored the shmmem statistics and found that used and max_used are constantly growing til it reaches the limit. As i mentioned we are using client-certificates and so we are also using the CRL feature. We do have a systemd-timer which fetches the CRL every hour and runs 'kamcmd tls.reload' when finished. Our tls.cfg looks like this: ``` [server:default] method = TLSv1.2+ private_key = /etc/letsencrypt/live/hostname.de/privkey.pem certificate = /etc/letsencrypt/live/hostname.de/fullchain.pem ca_list = /etc/kamailio/ca_list.pem ca_path = /etc/kamailio/ca_list.pem crl = /etc/kamailio/combined.crl.pem verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes [client:default] verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes ``` After testing a bit we found that every time tls.reload is executed Kamailio consumes a bit more memory which eventually leads to all the memory being consumed which leads to issues for our users. See following example: ``` [0][root@edgar-dev:~]# while true ; do /usr/sbin/kamcmd tls.reload ; /usr/sbin/kamcmd core.shmmem ; sleep 1 ; done Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 223001520 used: 41352552 real_used: 45433936 max_used: 45445968 fragments: 73 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 222377960 used: 41975592 real_used: 46057496 max_used: 46069232 fragments: 78 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 221748664 used: 42604992 real_used: 46686792 max_used: 46698080 fragments: 77 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 221110832 used: 43242408 real_used: 47324624 max_used: 47335608 fragments: 81 } ^C [130][root@edgar-dev:~]# ``` ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Everytime tls.reload is called the memory consumptions grows.. #### Debugging Data  ``` If you let me know what would be interesting for tracking this down, i am happy to provide logs/debugging data! ``` #### Log Messages  ``` If you let me know what would be interesting for tracking this down, i am happy to provide logs/debugging data! ``` #### SIP Traffic SIP doesnt seem to be relevant here ### Possible Solutions Calling tls.reload less often or restart kamailio before memory is consumed ;) ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.7.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` * Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) * Linux edgar-dev 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3823 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3823(a)github.com>

9 33

[kamailio/kamailio] cmake format options and naming styles (Issue #4075)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

Discussion to define cmake format options and coding/naming styles. It is better to define most of them now to have coherency in the future. Started from the discussion on #4066. Comment with what you would like to have, describing when useful why your proposal is a good/better option. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4075 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4075(a)github.com>

5 12

[kamailio/kamailio] tcp_timer_check_connections() logs on CRITICAL and is not caught by event_route[tcp:timeout] (Issue #3995)
by Fritjof Höst 13 Jun '25

13 Jun '25

### Description Hi! We are in the progress of upgrading from Kamailio 5.5 to 5.8. During our testing we have noticed a new error being reported from Kamailio. We don’t see any other errors following it. ```jsx /usr/sbin/kamailio[201]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:5544]: tcp_timer_check_connections(): message processing timeout on connection id: 67896 (state: 3) - closing ``` It does seem to be [new code](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/tcp_main.c#… in Kamailio reporting this issue. Given that this is a fairly expected thing, cleaning up a connection which receives no traffic within the given time, is there a need for it to be reported on CRITICAL? I’d also expect it to be caught by ``` event_route[tcp:timeout] { xlog("L_INFO","connection $conid timeouts (unanswered keepalives)"); } ``` given that [the description](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tcpops.ht… of this one is `Called for connection timeouts (unanswered keepalives).`. ### Troubleshooting We don't have any way to reproduce it, we are still investigating it to figure out the cause. It happens around every 2 hours, so we think there might some some scheduled test or job running in our test system causing this. ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - 5.8.3 * **Operating System**: Debian 12 AMI from the AWS Marketplace. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3995 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3995(a)github.com>

6 12

[kamailio/kamailio] tls_wolfssl: crash qm_free / qm_debug_check_frag (Issue #4074)
by Fred Posner 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

### Introduction First, I apologize for the lack of detail here. I am unable to get a core dump and as a production box, I was unable to run in debug mode. ### Description Using Kamailio 5.8.4 on Debian 12, every 60-80 minutes, the software would crash, blaming tls_wolfssl, such as: ``` 2024-12-16T14:58:27.554497+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9084]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:535]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x1 (out of memory block!) called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T14:58:27.554555+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9084]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f3440ba7560 (address 0x7f3440ba75a0) beginning overwritten (23)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by :29. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. 2024-12-16T14:58:27.616558+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9089]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:281]: receive_fd(): EOF on 103 2024-12-16T14:58:27.617684+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8992]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:805]: handle_sigs(): child process 9084 exited by a signal 6 2024-12-16T14:58:27.618339+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8992]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:809]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated 2024-12-16T14:58:27.618477+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8992]: INFO: <core> [main.c:832]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 2024-12-16T14:58:27.618589+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9088]: INFO: <core> [main.c:888]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received ``` ``` 2024-12-16T14:57:52.029277+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21605]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:535]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x1 (out of memory block!) called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T14:57:52.029347+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21605]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f085996b500 (address 0x7f085996b540) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048597+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21611]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:281]: receive_fd(): EOF on 101 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048921+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21512]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:805]: handle_sigs(): child process 21605 exited by a signal 6 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048953+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21512]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:809]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048975+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21512]: INFO: <core> [main.c:832]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048997+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21609]: INFO: <core> [main.c:888]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received ``` ``` 2024-12-16T16:21:35.967576+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10591]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f442778d110 (address 0x7f442778d150) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. ``` ``` 2024-12-16T13:31:55.995222+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7602]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:555]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f8e55830a70), called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240), first free tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_malloc(228) - ignoring 2024-12-16T13:32:40.093954+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7603]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:535]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x7a100000000 (out of memory block!) called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T13:32:40.094047+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7603]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f8e55762720 (address 0x7f8e55762760) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. 2024-12-16T13:32:40.260913+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7504]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:555]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f8e55761a70), called from core: core/tcp_main.c: _tcpconn_free(1666), first free tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T13:32:40.263520+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7504]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f8e55762720 (address 0x7f8e55762760) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. ``` The system was handling ~900 TLS registrations with ~2700 presence SUBSCRIBE events. **Running the same config with `tls.so` does not result in crash.** ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - 5.8.4 ``` version: kamailio 5.8.4 (x86_64/linux) 598105-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 598105 -dirty compiled on 04:31:34 Dec 16 2024 with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Release: 12 Codename: bookworm Linux ip-172-16-0-52 6.1.0-28-cloud-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.119-1 (2024-11-22) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` * TCP Settings ``` children=16 disable_tcp=no tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_max_connections=8192 tcp_defer_accept=yes tcp_accept_unique=0 tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 tcp_connection_match=1 tcp_connect_timeout=10 tcp_crlf_ping=yes tcp_linger2=1 tcp_keepalive=yes tcp_reuse_port=yes tcp_keepidle=20 tcp_keepintvl=15 tcp_rd_buf_size=65536 tcp_msg_data_timeout=40 tcp_msg_read_timeout=40 tcp_check_timer=20 tls_threads_mode=2 tls_max_connections=8192 ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4074 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4074(a)github.com>

3 6

[tracker] Assignee added: Assignment operators don't work
by sip-router 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task. FS#100 - Assignment operators don't work User who did this - Alex Hermann (axlh) http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=100 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

2 1

[kamailio/kamailio] Handling Duplicate Values in secfilter Module's kamcmd Commands (Issue #4091)
by AsedMorteza 08 Jun '25

08 Jun '25

**Description** The `secfilter` module in `kamcmd` currently allows duplicate entries when adding values to certain lists (e.g., blacklists, whitelists). This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential inconsistencies. Could you clarify the reason behind accepting duplicate values? Recently, I submitted a pull request to add delete commands to the `secfilter` module #4089. When a user, for example, executes: `kamcmd secfilter.del_bl user 1005` I iterate through the entire list to ensure all occurrences of `1005` are removed, as I realized duplicates might exist. This is inefficient and could be avoided by preventing duplicates in the first place. **Proposed Solutions** 1. **Prevent Duplicates in Existing `add` Commands:** * I can modify existing `add` commands to directly prevent the addition of duplicate values. This would simplify future operations and improve performance. 2. **Introduce New `add_unique` Commands:** * I can maintain the current `add` commands for backward compatibility. * I can introduce new `add_unique` commands (e.g., `secfilter.add_bl_unique`) that explicitly reject duplicate entries. **Recommendation** I recommend implementing the first solution (preventing duplicates in existing `add` commands) as it provides the most straightforward and efficient approach. **Further Considerations** * Consider adding a check for duplicates during the `add` operation and returning an appropriate error message if a duplicate is encountered. * Document the behavior of duplicate values in the `secfilter` module's documentation. **I would appreciate your feedback and guidance on the best course of action.** -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4091 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4091(a)github.com>

6 10

[kamailio/kamailio] Possibly adjusting the SDP parser to be more lenient towards scenarios where a stream is being removed/rejected and connection-information "c=" is only available per media (no session-wide "c=") and the removed/rejected stream omits all fields (Issue #3982)
by thomas414 31 May '25

31 May '25

### Description I encountered an issue with a specific device that is receiving a T.38 fax. The call gets established towards the device normally with inband media, then the device requests T.38 media and tries to remove the audio media via sending port 0 in the ReInvite SDP. Also it sends connection-information only on the media level and there is no "c=" on the session level. Reading through the related RFCs and the kamailio code and discussing this on the mailing list, we came to the conclusion that kamailio is doing everything correct as per RFC. Though we were wondering if it would be possible to adjust the parser to be not as strict as it is right now, and allow a missing "c=" line on the media-level if the stream is removed/rejected via port 0, since i see no sense in requiring connection information. Of course we are also in contact with the vendor to hopefully adjust on their side. Here are the related RFCs: 1. RFC8866 5.7 `A session description MUST contain either at least one "c=" line in each media description or a single "c=" line at the session level. It MAY contain a single session-level "c=" line and additional media-level "c=" line(s) per-media-description, in which case the media-level values override the session-level settings for the respective media.` 2. RFC3264 8.2 `Existing media streams are removed by creating a new SDP with the port number for that stream set to zero. The stream description MAY omit all attributes present previously, and MAY list just a single media format.` At first i was especially confused by the RFC3264 8.2 part, since it seemed correct what the device is sending, but if you read carefully and keep the wording for SDP in mind only attributes ("a=") MAY be omitted. So a "c=" line should still be in the SDP for the removed media if it's not included on the session-level. Or do you see this differently? ### Expected behavior Kamailio allows and parses the SDP when there is no session-wide "c=", a media stream is being removed via port zero and there is no "c=" for this media stream and only the remaining media streams include a "c=" line. #### Actual observed behavior Kamailio throws an error when trying to parse the SDP. #### Log Messages ``` <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:523]: parse_sdp_session(): can't find media IP in the message ``` #### SIP Traffic ``` v=0 o=xmserver 1726638425 1726638427 IN IP4 169.254.1.1 s=xmserver t=0 0 m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 8 m=image 56002 udptl t38 c=IN IP4 169.254.1.1 a=sendrecv a=T38FaxVersion:0 a=T38MaxBitRate:14400 a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:200 a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:72 a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy ``` ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.8.3 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Debian 12 Linux hostname 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3982 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3982(a)github.com>

3 5

[kamailio/kamailio] Inactive video stream: can't find media IP in the message (Issue #3406)
by schoberw 31 May '25

31 May '25

### Description In some situations the other side UA must reply with an inactive media stream. E.g. if video was added but not supported by the other side. The UAS then must answer with an m=video 0 RTP/.. line. It seams that the video section must contain a c= line with an IP address for rtpengine to function. If there is no c line (no IP address) the SDP body cannot be parsed and thus no RTP proxy is invoked. ### Troubleshooting Not easy to reproduce since the answer must bei "wrong". Is it correct to reply an SDP body (media = video) like this? ``` m=video 0 RTP/AVPF 96 a=label:1 a=inactive a=mid:1 ``` Maybe not (but Audiocodes SBC lates LTS version does it) - so we are dependent on other side now that this service works. #### Reproduction reInvite with Video to a UA that has no video Support (e.g. Bria -> Snom). Drop the c line in the video part with some textops in 200 OK (just to reproduce of course). A -> B, connect the call A -> + video, B has no video support A presses hold #### Log Messages Incoming 200 OK after doing hold with an inactive video: ``` v=0 o=root 436040161 309284577 IN IP4 1.2.3.5 s=call t=0 0 m=audio 14200 RTP/AVPF 9 8 126 c=IN IP4 1.2.3.5 a=ptime:20 a=recvonly a=mid:0 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:126 0-15 m=video 0 RTP/AVPF 96 a=label:1 a=inactive a=mid:1 Mar 27 17:52:22 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2938205]: ERROR: <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:490]: parse_sdp_session(): can't find media IP in the message Mar 27 17:52:22 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2938205]: INFO: <script>: >>> Sending Reply: 200 OK (1.2.3.4:443 -> 100.108.48.38:65251) ``` Compare to working SDP parsing: ``` a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:126 0-15 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 96 c=IN IP4 1.2.3.5 a=inactive a=mid:1 Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: ONREPLY_ROUTE[FORWARD] Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: ROUTE[RTPP_REPLY] Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > 200 with video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > 200 with inactive video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > Remove inactive video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > Answer to WebRTC client: 200 - qijpuibkv6ufhnd282ks Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: >>> Sending Reply: 200 OK (91.237.65.14:443 -> 80.108.48.38:65388) ``` ### Possible Solutions Tried to fix in script: ``` if(sdp_with_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with video"); if(sdp_with_active_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with active video"); if(!sdp_with_active_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with inactive video"); if(sdp_with_media("video") && !sdp_with_active_media("video")) { # try fix for RMT#60189 xlog("L_INFO", "> Remove inactive video"); sdp_remove_media("video"); msg_apply_changes(); # needed? } ``` But since sdpops cannot parse it cannot remove the buggy media, too. See the log: non of the xlog is logging. If there is inactive media the c line is not mandatory. The parser should accept this by adding a default IP of 0.0.0.0, if needed Doing tricks with textops is not a easy nor performant solution to accept this wrong SDP from other parties. ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 ``` * **Operating System**: Debian Bullseye -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3406 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3406(a)github.com>

3 5

[kamailio/kamailio] tls: Create one shared context and reuse it. (PR #3972)
by Xenofon Karamanos 28 May '25

28 May '25

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [x] Related to issue #3823 #### Description  This PR aims to implement what was discussed in [mailing list](https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-dev@lists.kama… regarding some `tls.reload` and increasing memory usage. It adds a new parameter `enable_shared_ctx` in `tls` module that if set to 0, preserves the old behavior and if set to 1 (other than 0 tbh), it creates a single SSL context that is being shared. This have the effect of using way less memory when initialized as well, but also minimizes (can't say it fixes the problem) the `tls.reload` memory increase. I have also added a small markdown (comparison.md) file, where some comparisons where made between enabled/disabled shared context and with/without CA file (where the initial problem was occurring by the reporter). Feedback would be necessary to verify whether this patch, acts as expected and kamailio works as intented. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972 -- Commit Summary -- * tls: Add parameter for shared contexts * tls: Comparison for enable_shared_ctx -- File Changes -- A comparison.md (15) M src/modules/tls/tls_domain.c (172) M src/modules/tls/tls_mod.c (11) M src/modules/tls/tls_mod.h (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3972(a)github.com>

4 12

[kamailio/kamailio] core: local TCP socket is bound on listening address (PR #3925)
by sergey-safarov 28 May '25

28 May '25

#### Pre-Submission Checklist - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist: - [x] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description As a local IP address for TCP sending operation the Kamailio service is taking the same network_interface/IP_address, which is used by the service for TCP listening. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925 -- Commit Summary -- * core: local TCP socket is bound on listening address -- File Changes -- M src/core/tcp_main.c (24) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3925(a)github.com>

5 16

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev December 2024