sr-dev December 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

17 participants
351 discussions

[tracker] Assignee added: Assignment operators don't work
by sip-router 06 Jul '25

06 Jul '25

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task. FS#100 - Assignment operators don't work User who did this - Alex Hermann (axlh) http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=100 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

3 2

[kamailio/kamailio] [Websocket] websocket:closed sometimes is not fired (Issue #3950)
by Gustavo Almeida 27 Jun '25

27 Jun '25

### Description After carrying out some load tests using the `Websocket` module, I noticed that sometimes the `websocket:closed` event is not triggered. This problem seems to be particularly noticeable when the load is high and simultaneous. Example: 1000 records simultaneously. In the tests carried out, I realized that the number of times the event is not triggered is small, in the order of [1-10]/1000. I check that when I do a `ws.dump` I don't have any active connections, and I confirm … [View More]that they are all effectively cleaned (`netstat -ano | grep 8061`). However, the event is not triggered for some connections. I can see this in the logs, and also when i display the content of an hash table, i'm dropping key inside `websocket:closed` event. ### Troubleshooting The troubleshooting was simplistic, i.e. I ran the same test n times, and validated that the event was triggered for all connections, the number of `ws` connections listed by `Kamailio`, and the open connections. #### Reproduction To reproduce, we can use any mechanism that emulates the use of the `Websocket` module. For example, I used the `sipexer` tool to create a `wss` connection with `Kamailio`, forcing simultaneous registrations. Example command: `sipexer -cb -mt register -ex 60 -au <user> -ap <pass> -fuser example -fd mydomain -wso https://10.0.0.12:10000 -ruri sip:kamailio -su wss://kamailio:8061` Kamailio TLS listener: `listen=tls:10.0.0.12:8061 advertise PUBLIC_IP` Websocket module: ``` loadmodule "websocket.so" tcp_accept_no_cl=yes ``` ``` event_route[websocket:closed] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "WebSocket connection closed $proto:$si:$sp\n"); <I also delete where a htable key> } ``` #### Debugging Data ``` [root@ ~]$ prcmd ws.dump { connections: { } info: { wscounter: 0 truncated: no } } [root@ ~]$ netstat -ano | grep 8061 tcp 0 0 10.0.0.12:8061 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN off (0.00/0/0) [root ~]$ prcmd htable.dump wsauth | grep "name" | wc -l 3 [root ~]$ cat /var/log/kamailio.log | grep "WebSocket connection closed" | wc -l 997 [root ~]$ cat /var/log/proxy-registrar/proxy-registrar.log | grep "ERR" | grep "WAR" | wc -l 0 ``` #### Log Messages Nothing relevant. #### SIP Traffic Nothing relevant here, the SIP Flow is OK. ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) a004cf-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: a004cf -dirty compiled on 23:17:27 Jun 7 2024 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3950 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3950(a)github.com> [View Less]

6 7

[kamailio/kamailio] Writing to $fU or $tU appends to header user (Issue #3165)
by Benoît Panizzon 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

Dear Gang Possibly @oej could provide more in-depth information as he has witnessed this issue. Usually the user of the from URI is the phone number displayed at the destination. There are situations where this phone number is translated. As example. In Switzerland, the user is used to see numbers in a local format. National number starting with 0 and international numbers with 00 but on interconnection between telcos, e164 is used. So basically when a call is sent to a customer '+41' is … [View More]

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] cmake: switching deb rules (Issue #4053)
by Victor Seva 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

Opening this generic issue to track issues when trying to switch deb package generation to cmake: -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4053 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4053(a)github.com>

5 59

[kamailio/kamailio] Handling Duplicate Values in secfilter Module's kamcmd Commands (Issue #4091)
by AsedMorteza 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

**Description** The `secfilter` module in `kamcmd` currently allows duplicate entries when adding values to certain lists (e.g., blacklists, whitelists). This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential inconsistencies. Could you clarify the reason behind accepting duplicate values? Recently, I submitted a pull request to add delete commands to the `secfilter` module #4089. When a user, for example, executes: `kamcmd secfilter.del_bl user 1005` I iterate through the entire list to … [View More]

6 12

[kamailio/kamailio] Memory usage increases everytime tls.reload is executed (Issue #3823)
by Sebastian Denz 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

### Description We are using Kamailio 5.7.4 on Debian 12 (from http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio57) with rtpengine as an Edgeproxy for our clients. The instance terminates SIP/TLS (with Cliencertificates) and forwards the SIP Traffic to internal systems. After some days we are getting errors like this `tls_complete_init(): tls: ssl bug #1491 workaround: not enough memory for safe operation: shm=7318616 threshold1=8912896` First we thought Kamailio just doesnt have enough memory, so we doubled … [View More]it.. But after some days the Logmessage (and Userissues) occured again. So we monitored the shmmem statistics and found that used and max_used are constantly growing til it reaches the limit. As i mentioned we are using client-certificates and so we are also using the CRL feature. We do have a systemd-timer which fetches the CRL every hour and runs 'kamcmd tls.reload' when finished. Our tls.cfg looks like this: ``` [server:default] method = TLSv1.2+ private_key = /etc/letsencrypt/live/hostname.de/privkey.pem certificate = /etc/letsencrypt/live/hostname.de/fullchain.pem ca_list = /etc/kamailio/ca_list.pem ca_path = /etc/kamailio/ca_list.pem crl = /etc/kamailio/combined.crl.pem verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes [client:default] verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes ``` After testing a bit we found that every time tls.reload is executed Kamailio consumes a bit more memory which eventually leads to all the memory being consumed which leads to issues for our users. See following example: ``` [0][root@edgar-dev:~]# while true ; do /usr/sbin/kamcmd tls.reload ; /usr/sbin/kamcmd core.shmmem ; sleep 1 ; done Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 223001520 used: 41352552 real_used: 45433936 max_used: 45445968 fragments: 73 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 222377960 used: 41975592 real_used: 46057496 max_used: 46069232 fragments: 78 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 221748664 used: 42604992 real_used: 46686792 max_used: 46698080 fragments: 77 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 221110832 used: 43242408 real_used: 47324624 max_used: 47335608 fragments: 81 } ^C [130][root@edgar-dev:~]# ``` ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Everytime tls.reload is called the memory consumptions grows.. #### Debugging Data  ``` If you let me know what would be interesting for tracking this down, i am happy to provide logs/debugging data! ``` #### Log Messages  ``` If you let me know what would be interesting for tracking this down, i am happy to provide logs/debugging data! ``` #### SIP Traffic SIP doesnt seem to be relevant here ### Possible Solutions Calling tls.reload less often or restart kamailio before memory is consumed ;) ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.7.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` * Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) * Linux edgar-dev 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3823 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3823(a)github.com> [View Less]

9 33

[kamailio/kamailio] cmake format options and naming styles (Issue #4075)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

Discussion to define cmake format options and coding/naming styles. It is better to define most of them now to have coherency in the future. Started from the discussion on #4066. Comment with what you would like to have, describing when useful why your proposal is a good/better option. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4075 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4075(a)github.com>

5 12

[kamailio/kamailio] tcp_timer_check_connections() logs on CRITICAL and is not caught by event_route[tcp:timeout] (Issue #3995)
by Fritjof Höst 13 Jun '25

13 Jun '25

### Description Hi! We are in the progress of upgrading from Kamailio 5.5 to 5.8. During our testing we have noticed a new error being reported from Kamailio. We don’t see any other errors following it. ```jsx /usr/sbin/kamailio[201]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:5544]: tcp_timer_check_connections(): message processing timeout on connection id: 67896 (state: 3) - closing ``` It does seem to be [new code](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/tcp_main.c#… in … [View More]

6 12

[kamailio/kamailio] tls_wolfssl: crash qm_free / qm_debug_check_frag (Issue #4074)
by Fred Posner 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

### Introduction First, I apologize for the lack of detail here. I am unable to get a core dump and as a production box, I was unable to run in debug mode. ### Description Using Kamailio 5.8.4 on Debian 12, every 60-80 minutes, the software would crash, blaming tls_wolfssl, such as: ``` 2024-12-16T14:58:27.554497+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9084]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:535]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x1 (out of memory block!) called from … [View More]tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T14:58:27.554555+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9084]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f3440ba7560 (address 0x7f3440ba75a0) beginning overwritten (23)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by :29. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. 2024-12-16T14:58:27.616558+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9089]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:281]: receive_fd(): EOF on 103 2024-12-16T14:58:27.617684+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8992]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:805]: handle_sigs(): child process 9084 exited by a signal 6 2024-12-16T14:58:27.618339+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8992]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:809]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated 2024-12-16T14:58:27.618477+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8992]: INFO: <core> [main.c:832]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 2024-12-16T14:58:27.618589+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[9088]: INFO: <core> [main.c:888]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received ``` ``` 2024-12-16T14:57:52.029277+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21605]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:535]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x1 (out of memory block!) called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T14:57:52.029347+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21605]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f085996b500 (address 0x7f085996b540) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048597+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21611]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:281]: receive_fd(): EOF on 101 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048921+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21512]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:805]: handle_sigs(): child process 21605 exited by a signal 6 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048953+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21512]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:809]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048975+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21512]: INFO: <core> [main.c:832]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 2024-12-16T14:57:52.048997+00:00 ip-172-16-0-73 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21609]: INFO: <core> [main.c:888]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received ``` ``` 2024-12-16T16:21:35.967576+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10591]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f442778d110 (address 0x7f442778d150) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. ``` ``` 2024-12-16T13:31:55.995222+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7602]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:555]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f8e55830a70), called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240), first free tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_malloc(228) - ignoring 2024-12-16T13:32:40.093954+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7603]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:535]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x7a100000000 (out of memory block!) called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T13:32:40.094047+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7603]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f8e55762720 (address 0x7f8e55762760) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. 2024-12-16T13:32:40.260913+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7504]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:555]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f8e55761a70), called from core: core/tcp_main.c: _tcpconn_free(1666), first free tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c: ser_free(240) - ignoring 2024-12-16T13:32:40.263520+00:00 ip-172-16-0-52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7504]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:126]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: fragm. 0x7f8e55762720 (address 0x7f8e55762760) beginning overwritten (0)! Memory allocator was called from tls_wolfssl: tls_init.c:240. Fragment marked by (null):0. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. ``` The system was handling ~900 TLS registrations with ~2700 presence SUBSCRIBE events. **Running the same config with `tls.so` does not result in crash.** ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - 5.8.4 ``` version: kamailio 5.8.4 (x86_64/linux) 598105-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 598105 -dirty compiled on 04:31:34 Dec 16 2024 with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Release: 12 Codename: bookworm Linux ip-172-16-0-52 6.1.0-28-cloud-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.119-1 (2024-11-22) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` * TCP Settings ``` children=16 disable_tcp=no tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_max_connections=8192 tcp_defer_accept=yes tcp_accept_unique=0 tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 tcp_connection_match=1 tcp_connect_timeout=10 tcp_crlf_ping=yes tcp_linger2=1 tcp_keepalive=yes tcp_reuse_port=yes tcp_keepidle=20 tcp_keepintvl=15 tcp_rd_buf_size=65536 tcp_msg_data_timeout=40 tcp_msg_read_timeout=40 tcp_check_timer=20 tls_threads_mode=2 tls_max_connections=8192 ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4074 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4074(a)github.com> [View Less]

3 6

[kamailio/kamailio] Possibly adjusting the SDP parser to be more lenient towards scenarios where a stream is being removed/rejected and connection-information "c=" is only available per media (no session-wide "c=") and the removed/rejected stream omits all fields (Issue #3982)
by thomas414 31 May '25

31 May '25

### Description I encountered an issue with a specific device that is receiving a T.38 fax. The call gets established towards the device normally with inband media, then the device requests T.38 media and tries to remove the audio media via sending port 0 in the ReInvite SDP. Also it sends connection-information only on the media level and there is no "c=" on the session level. Reading through the related RFCs and the kamailio code and discussing this on the mailing list, we came to the … [View More]conclusion that kamailio is doing everything correct as per RFC. Though we were wondering if it would be possible to adjust the parser to be not as strict as it is right now, and allow a missing "c=" line on the media-level if the stream is removed/rejected via port 0, since i see no sense in requiring connection information. Of course we are also in contact with the vendor to hopefully adjust on their side. Here are the related RFCs: 1. RFC8866 5.7 `A session description MUST contain either at least one "c=" line in each media description or a single "c=" line at the session level. It MAY contain a single session-level "c=" line and additional media-level "c=" line(s) per-media-description, in which case the media-level values override the session-level settings for the respective media.` 2. RFC3264 8.2 `Existing media streams are removed by creating a new SDP with the port number for that stream set to zero. The stream description MAY omit all attributes present previously, and MAY list just a single media format.` At first i was especially confused by the RFC3264 8.2 part, since it seemed correct what the device is sending, but if you read carefully and keep the wording for SDP in mind only attributes ("a=") MAY be omitted. So a "c=" line should still be in the SDP for the removed media if it's not included on the session-level. Or do you see this differently? ### Expected behavior Kamailio allows and parses the SDP when there is no session-wide "c=", a media stream is being removed via port zero and there is no "c=" for this media stream and only the remaining media streams include a "c=" line. #### Actual observed behavior Kamailio throws an error when trying to parse the SDP. #### Log Messages ``` <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:523]: parse_sdp_session(): can't find media IP in the message ``` #### SIP Traffic ``` v=0 o=xmserver 1726638425 1726638427 IN IP4 169.254.1.1 s=xmserver t=0 0 m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 8 m=image 56002 udptl t38 c=IN IP4 169.254.1.1 a=sendrecv a=T38FaxVersion:0 a=T38MaxBitRate:14400 a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR:0 a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG:0 a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:200 a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:72 a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy ``` ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.8.3 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Debian 12 Linux hostname 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3982 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3982(a)github.com> [View Less]

3 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev December 2024