sr-dev April 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

12 participants
257 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] Writing to $fU or $tU appends to header user (Issue #3165)
by Benoît Panizzon 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

Dear Gang Possibly @oej could provide more in-depth information as he has witnessed this issue. Usually the user of the from URI is the phone number displayed at the destination. There are situations where this phone number is translated. As example. In Switzerland, the user is used to see numbers in a local format. National number starting with 0 and international numbers with 00 but on interconnection between telcos, e164 is used. So basically when a call is sent to a customer '+41' is replaced by '0' and '+' is replaced by '00'. Let's start with an example From: header: `From: "Maurice Moss" <sip:+41991234567@example.com>;user=phone` So shortly before the call is sent out to the location of the registered CPE, this is done: ``` if ($fU =~ "^\+41") { $fU = "0" + $(fU{s.substr,3,0}); } else if ($fU = ~ "^\+") { $fU = "00" + $(fU{s.substr,1,0}); } ``` What is sent to the CPE now looks like this: `From: "Maurice Moss" <sip:0991234567@example.com>;user=phone` Now we hit an error like 486 BUSY and the destination has call forwarding active to a mobile phone on another TSP. So we have to send the call out back the IC and numbers need to be translated back to e164. We handle this in a failure route, which in turn could trigger a branch route. So we revert the number back to e164: `$fU = "+41" + $(fU{s.substr,1,0});` Expected outcome: `From: "Maurice Moss" <sip:+41991234567@example.com>;user=phone` Observed outcome: `From: "Maurice Moss" <sip:0991234567+41991234567@example.com>;user=phone` So setting $fU more than once is appending to the user element of the From header URI. This behavior has not been found in any documentation. I have been working around most of the issues by making sure I change $fU (and $tU) at the latest possible time and only once. But in the case described above, I have not been able to come up with a work-around yet. I also can't think of any benefit of the way those PV are handled or any harm that could be done, to handle them differently and make the last 'write' overwrite and previous value, instead of appending. Thank you for looking into this. -Benoît- -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3165 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3165(a)github.com>

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] Memory usage increases everytime tls.reload is executed (Issue #3823)
by Sebastian Denz 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

### Description We are using Kamailio 5.7.4 on Debian 12 (from http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio57) with rtpengine as an Edgeproxy for our clients. The instance terminates SIP/TLS (with Cliencertificates) and forwards the SIP Traffic to internal systems. After some days we are getting errors like this `tls_complete_init(): tls: ssl bug #1491 workaround: not enough memory for safe operation: shm=7318616 threshold1=8912896` First we thought Kamailio just doesnt have enough memory, so we doubled it.. But after some days the Logmessage (and Userissues) occured again. So we monitored the shmmem statistics and found that used and max_used are constantly growing til it reaches the limit. As i mentioned we are using client-certificates and so we are also using the CRL feature. We do have a systemd-timer which fetches the CRL every hour and runs 'kamcmd tls.reload' when finished. Our tls.cfg looks like this: ``` [server:default] method = TLSv1.2+ private_key = /etc/letsencrypt/live/hostname.de/privkey.pem certificate = /etc/letsencrypt/live/hostname.de/fullchain.pem ca_list = /etc/kamailio/ca_list.pem ca_path = /etc/kamailio/ca_list.pem crl = /etc/kamailio/combined.crl.pem verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes [client:default] verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes ``` After testing a bit we found that every time tls.reload is executed Kamailio consumes a bit more memory which eventually leads to all the memory being consumed which leads to issues for our users. See following example: ``` [0][root@edgar-dev:~]# while true ; do /usr/sbin/kamcmd tls.reload ; /usr/sbin/kamcmd core.shmmem ; sleep 1 ; done Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 223001520 used: 41352552 real_used: 45433936 max_used: 45445968 fragments: 73 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 222377960 used: 41975592 real_used: 46057496 max_used: 46069232 fragments: 78 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 221748664 used: 42604992 real_used: 46686792 max_used: 46698080 fragments: 77 } Ok. TLS configuration reloaded. { total: 268435456 free: 221110832 used: 43242408 real_used: 47324624 max_used: 47335608 fragments: 81 } ^C [130][root@edgar-dev:~]# ``` ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction Everytime tls.reload is called the memory consumptions grows.. #### Debugging Data  ``` If you let me know what would be interesting for tracking this down, i am happy to provide logs/debugging data! ``` #### Log Messages  ``` If you let me know what would be interesting for tracking this down, i am happy to provide logs/debugging data! ``` #### SIP Traffic SIP doesnt seem to be relevant here ### Possible Solutions Calling tls.reload less often or restart kamailio before memory is consumed ;) ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.7.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` * Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) * Linux edgar-dev 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3823 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3823(a)github.com>

9 33

[tracker] Assignee added: Assignment operators don't work
by sip-router 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task. FS#100 - Assignment operators don't work User who did this - Alex Hermann (axlh) http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=100 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

2 1

[kamailio/kamailio] Inactive video stream: can't find media IP in the message (Issue #3406)
by schoberw 31 May '25

31 May '25

### Description In some situations the other side UA must reply with an inactive media stream. E.g. if video was added but not supported by the other side. The UAS then must answer with an m=video 0 RTP/.. line. It seams that the video section must contain a c= line with an IP address for rtpengine to function. If there is no c line (no IP address) the SDP body cannot be parsed and thus no RTP proxy is invoked. ### Troubleshooting Not easy to reproduce since the answer must bei "wrong". Is it correct to reply an SDP body (media = video) like this? ``` m=video 0 RTP/AVPF 96 a=label:1 a=inactive a=mid:1 ``` Maybe not (but Audiocodes SBC lates LTS version does it) - so we are dependent on other side now that this service works. #### Reproduction reInvite with Video to a UA that has no video Support (e.g. Bria -> Snom). Drop the c line in the video part with some textops in 200 OK (just to reproduce of course). A -> B, connect the call A -> + video, B has no video support A presses hold #### Log Messages Incoming 200 OK after doing hold with an inactive video: ``` v=0 o=root 436040161 309284577 IN IP4 1.2.3.5 s=call t=0 0 m=audio 14200 RTP/AVPF 9 8 126 c=IN IP4 1.2.3.5 a=ptime:20 a=recvonly a=mid:0 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:126 0-15 m=video 0 RTP/AVPF 96 a=label:1 a=inactive a=mid:1 Mar 27 17:52:22 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2938205]: ERROR: <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:490]: parse_sdp_session(): can't find media IP in the message Mar 27 17:52:22 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2938205]: INFO: <script>: >>> Sending Reply: 200 OK (1.2.3.4:443 -> 100.108.48.38:65251) ``` Compare to working SDP parsing: ``` a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:126 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:126 0-15 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 96 c=IN IP4 1.2.3.5 a=inactive a=mid:1 Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: ONREPLY_ROUTE[FORWARD] Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: ROUTE[RTPP_REPLY] Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > 200 with video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > 200 with inactive video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > Remove inactive video Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: > Answer to WebRTC client: 200 - qijpuibkv6ufhnd282ks Mar 27 18:00:17 c5p05es2-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2942881]: INFO: <script>: >>> Sending Reply: 200 OK (91.237.65.14:443 -> 80.108.48.38:65388) ``` ### Possible Solutions Tried to fix in script: ``` if(sdp_with_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with video"); if(sdp_with_active_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with active video"); if(!sdp_with_active_media("video")) xlog("L_INFO", "> $rs with inactive video"); if(sdp_with_media("video") && !sdp_with_active_media("video")) { # try fix for RMT#60189 xlog("L_INFO", "> Remove inactive video"); sdp_remove_media("video"); msg_apply_changes(); # needed? } ``` But since sdpops cannot parse it cannot remove the buggy media, too. See the log: non of the xlog is logging. If there is inactive media the c line is not mandatory. The parser should accept this by adding a default IP of 0.0.0.0, if needed Doing tricks with textops is not a easy nor performant solution to accept this wrong SDP from other parties. ### Additional Information ``` version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 ``` * **Operating System**: Debian Bullseye -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3406 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3406(a)github.com>

3 5

[kamailio/kamailio] clean_sa(): Error sending delete SAs command via netlink socket: Invalid argument (#2707)
by openspring 16 Apr '25

16 Apr '25

### Description  #### Log Messages  ``` 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/route_struct.c:128]: mk_action(): ACTION type5, i/count 0/1: type 1(1)/ data 0x7f8583620ef0 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/route_struct.c:128]: mk_action(): ACTION type16, i/count 0/3: type 22(16)/ data 0x7f8583621ad8 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/route_struct.c:128]: mk_action(): ACTION type16, i/count 1/3: type 8(8)/ data 0x7f8583620fd8 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/route_struct.c:128]: mk_action(): ACTION type16, i/count 2/3: type 0(0)/ data 0x7f8500000000 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/route.c:129]: route_add(): mapping routing block (0xb914c0)[MT_indialog_reply] to 6 ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:765]: destroy_modules(): starting modules destroy phase 0(117561) DEBUG: debugger [debugger_api.c:1267]: dbg_destroy_mod_levels(): Destroyed _dbg_mod_table, size 32 0(117561) ERROR: ims_ipsec_pcscf [ipsec.c:567]: clean_sa(): Error sending delete SAs command via netlink socket: Invalid argument 0(117561) WARNING: ims_ipsec_pcscf [cmd.c:998]: ipsec_cleanall(): Error cleaning IPSec Security associations during startup. 0(117561) ERROR: ims_ipsec_pcscf [ipsec.c:609]: clean_policy(): Error sending delete policies command via netlink socket: Invalid argument 0(117561) WARNING: ims_ipsec_pcscf [cmd.c:1002]: ipsec_cleanall(): Error cleaning IPSec Policies during startup. 0(117561) ERROR: ims_ipsec_pcscf [ims_ipsec_pcscf_mod.c:309]: mod_destroy(): Error destroying spi generator 0(117561) ERROR: ims_ipsec_pcscf [ims_ipsec_pcscf_mod.c:313]: mod_destroy(): Error destroying port generator 0(117561) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:84]: tm_shutdown(): start 0(117561) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:87]: tm_shutdown(): emptying hash table 0(117561) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:89]: tm_shutdown(): removing semaphores 0(117561) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:91]: tm_shutdown(): destroying tmcb lists 0(117561) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:94]: tm_shutdown(): done 0(117561) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/shm.c:289]: shm_destroy_manager(): destroying memory manager: q_malloc 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:1185]: qm_shm_lock_destroy(): destroying the shared memory lock 0(117561) DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/pkg.c:98]: pkg_destroy_manager(): destroying memory manager: q_malloc ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.4.4 (x86_64/linux) 8d6c2b flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8d6c2b compiled on 22:26:30 Apr 11 2021 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2707

5 5

[kamailio/kamailio] topos: add enable_register_publish (PR #3766)
by Harish S 09 Mar '25

09 Mar '25

Added enable_register_publish parameter to enable REGISTER and PUBLISH method for topos If set to 1 REGISTER and PUBLISH will be enabled for topos Currently only via header will be applied for topos and if mask_callid is set to 1 call-ID will be masked. Other headers should be manged by the user as required.   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766 -- Commit Summary -- * add enable_register_publish -- File Changes -- M src/modules/topos/topos_mod.c (2) M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.c (132) M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.h (2) M src/modules/topos/tps_storage.c (6) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3766(a)github.com>

5 39

[kamailio/kamailio] Wrong Route header order in called party re-INVITE when using topos (Issue #3778)
by Javi Montoro 24 Feb '25

24 Feb '25

Hi There, We found a situation where topos seems to break, let me explain... Assuming the following scenario: ``` Caller ---- Callee A: ------INVITE-----> Record-Route:A.A.A.A, Record-Route:B.B.B.B B: <-----200 OK------ C: <-----INVITE------ Route: A.A.A.A, B.B.B.B D: ------200 OK-----> Record-Route:B.B.B.B, Record-Route:A.A.A.A (reversed order) E: <======INVITE===== Route: B.B.B.B, A.A.A.A (wrong) ``` A and B establish the connection from caller to callee, and topos works fine. C (re-INVITE from callee) sends the Route header according to the Record-Routes from the original INVITE (A) D is the 200 OK sent from the caller to the first re-INVITE (C) coming from the callee, with the Record-Route headers reversed, because is the order in which the callee received them; and according to the RFC it's working as intended: ``` When a UAS responds to a request with a response that establishes a dialog (such as a 2xx to INVITE), the UAS MUST copy all Record-Route header field values from the request into the response (including the URIs, URI parameters, and any Record-Route header field parameters, whether they are known or unknown to the UAS) and MUST maintain the order of those values. [...] [When a UAC receives a response...] The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. ``` E takes the Route order from the last 200 OK ignoring they are in reversed order and assuming the top one is the first one, when it should be the other way around, sending to an IP address not reachable from the callee. And I think here is the issue, topos should not update the path on the Record-Routes from a 200 OK but if it does, it should take the reverse order When disabling topos, everything works fine, or with topos enabled, by setting rr_update=0 works for us, but what if there is a real path update, rr_update=0 wouldn't work for us anymore. The Kamailio version is 5.8.0-rc0 Let me know if you need more information. Thanks a lot, Javi -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778(a)github.com>

5 16

[kamailio/kamailio] Close parenthesis on error description (#2589)
by Javier Valencia 20 Jan '25

20 Jan '25

Close parentheses on error description when *Not enough parameters* on *htable_rpc_delete*. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589 -- Commit Summary -- * Close parenthesis on error description -- File Changes -- M src/modules/htable/htable.c (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2589

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] free_fixup functions in cmd_export_t are not called (Issue #3814)
by Xenofon Karamanos 06 Dec '24

06 Dec '24

### Description It seems that the fixup_free_* functions are not getting called when used with: ``` static cmd_export_t cmds[] = { {"acc_log_request", (cmd_function)w_acc_log_request, 1, acc_fixup, free_acc_fixup, ANY_ROUTE}, // ... {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0} }; static int free_acc_fixup(void **param, int param_no) { LM_CRIT("acc free fixup = %d\n", param_no); if(*param) { pkg_free(*param); *param = 0; } return 0; } ``` Nothing is getting logged from the function. Is this expected not to print in free_fixup due to the destruction of kamailio and the logging is not reliable? I also used gdb and added some breakpoints in `fixup` and `free_fixup` functions in some other modules (file_out) and the breakpoint was only found in `fixup` but not in `free_fixup`. When is the `free_fixup` supposed to be called, at kamailio destruction or after fixing it and before the main loop starts?  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  Use any module that has a custom (maybe also provided from core) `free_fixup` function, and monitor if `free_fixup` is called using debug mode. #### Log Messages  ``` Apr 15 15:52:03 app01 kamailio[812169]: INFO: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:402]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fcdcab18010, 56) called from file_out: file_out.c: fo_fixup_str_index(287) Apr 15 15:52:03 app01 kamailio[812169]: INFO: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:449]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fcdcab18010, 64) returns address 0x7fcdcacc4280 frag. 0x7fcdcacc4240 (size=64) on 1 -th hit``` `0x7fcdcacc4240` fragment is not found anywhere in the logs reported that it was freed unlike other malloced resources. ``` ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.9.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 8bc64a flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8bc64a compiled on 15:32:09 Apr 15 2024 with gcc 10.5.0 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Release: 20.04 Codename: focal 5.4.0-176-generic #196-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 22 16:46:39 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3814 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3814(a)github.com>

3 9

[kamailio/kamailio] no corresponding socket found error (Issue #3583)
by descartin 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

Hello all we are seeing these kind of logs in a Debian GNU/Linux 11 using kamailio 5.5.6 ```Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155702]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[164.152.22.248:5060](http://164.152.22.248:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155698]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.184:5060](http://208.74.138.184:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155695]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.181:5060](http://208.74.138.181:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155693]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[38.102.250.60:5060](http://38.102.250.60:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:302]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket for "87.1.1.27" af 2 Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:470]: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155697]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.184:5060](http://208.74.138.184:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155694]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[192.40.216.97:5060](http://192.40.216.97:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155694]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.180:5060](http://208.74.138.180:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155714]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/)) ``` The kamailio instance we are using is receiving around 1500 calls per second in average when we do start seeing these errors more frequently In this instance we are using multihomed the listen address list is ``` children=14 socket_workers=1 listen=udp:[192.168.99.70:5081](http://192.168.99.70:5081/) listen=udp:[192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/) listen=udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) listen=tcp:[192.168.96.105:8095](http://192.168.96.105:8095/) listen=tcp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) tcp_children=6 port=5060 ``` We use the first worker only to perform the OPTIONS requests from the dispatcher module. The sockets listen=udp:[192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/) listen=udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) are used to communicate both A and B legs so when a message is received at [192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/) we send it to [87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/) and viceversa We were using $fs variable before doing the t_relay() function. This way is working, but when load increases, seems sometimes kamailio doesn't get the proper socket to forward the reply. I think the errors mainly are related to responses which are being forwarded, like if the function get_sock_info_list was not able to retrieve the listen interfaces we have tried to set in the onreply routes the commands set_recv_socket("udp:[192.168.99.81:5060](http://192.168.99.81:5060/)"); set_send_socket("udp:[87.1.1.27:5060](http://87.1.1.27:5060/)"); (when reply goes from private to public domain) and it seems it reduces the number of ``` Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155702]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[164.152.22.248:5060](http://164.152.22.248:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155698]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.184:5060](http://208.74.138.184:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:13 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155695]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[208.74.138.181:5060](http://208.74.138.181:5060/)) Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155693]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:[38.102.250.60:5060](http://38.102.250.60:5060/)) errors ``` But i honestly don't know why the ```Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:302]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket for "87.1.1.27" af 2 Sep 21 17:41:14 lax-dedge-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[3155707]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:470]: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket) appear ``` We also tried to increase the kernel buffers rmem and wmem from 208KB (as we had by default) to 4MB Do you know a reason which could cause these logs to appear? Any setup that could mitigate them? thanks a lot and regards david escartin -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3583 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3583(a)github.com>

5 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev April 2024