sr-dev September 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

15 participants
170 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] core: add support for custom log function (PR #3902)
by Nirv.Ana 26 Sep '24

26 Sep '24

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description Allow Kamailio modules to register their log function so that all Kamailio log messages (coming from core and other modules) are logged uniformly in the format defined by the custom log function. To enable the custom log format feature, Kamailio must be compiled with the `CUSTOM_LOG_FMT` flag. Then the module that wishes to modify the log format has to call `km_custom_log_func_set` during the initialization to supply a custom log formatting function (see `km_default_custom_log_func` as an example). You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3902 -- Commit Summary -- * core: add support for custom log function -- File Changes -- M src/core/dprint.c (19) M src/core/dprint.h (47) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3902.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3902.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3902 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3902(a)github.com>

4 19

smpp router project
by tarikogut＠gmail.com 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

hello i want development about smpp to sip module do you have any documentation ?

3 7

git:master:6848dd7d: Makefile.defs: version set to 6.0.0-dev3
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: 6848dd7d656f872013c857b6b78ebd8bae9b8604 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6848dd7d656f872013c857b6b78ebd8… Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Date: 2024-09-25T10:10:11+02:00 Makefile.defs: version set to 6.0.0-dev3 --- Modified: src/Makefile.defs --- Diff: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6848dd7d656f872013c857b6b78ebd8… Patch: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6848dd7d656f872013c857b6b78ebd8… --- diff --git a/src/Makefile.defs b/src/Makefile.defs index 1f3e0e81606..c3ae2b8b857 100644 --- a/src/Makefile.defs +++ b/src/Makefile.defs @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ INSTALL_FLAVOUR=$(FLAVOUR) VERSION = 6 PATCHLEVEL = 0 SUBLEVEL = 0 -EXTRAVERSION = -dev2 +EXTRAVERSION = -dev3 # memory manager switcher # 0 - f_malloc (fast malloc)

1 0

git:master:621f3132: core: print errno on tcp bind failure
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: 621f3132708405939d3a40fb98ae57b793cd246e URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/621f3132708405939d3a40fb98ae57b… Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Date: 2024-09-25T10:07:44+02:00 core: print errno on tcp bind failure - log message with value of sr_bind_ipv6_link_local --- Modified: src/core/tcp_main.c --- Diff: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/621f3132708405939d3a40fb98ae57b… Patch: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/621f3132708405939d3a40fb98ae57b… --- diff --git a/src/core/tcp_main.c b/src/core/tcp_main.c index 9daaf1ce641..e65520fa7ed 100644 --- a/src/core/tcp_main.c +++ b/src/core/tcp_main.c @@ -3284,12 +3284,14 @@ int tcp_init(struct socket_info *sock_info) } #endif if(bind(sock_info->socket, &addr->s, sockaddru_len(*addr)) == -1) { - LM_ERR("bind(%x, %p, %d) on %s:%d : %s\n", sock_info->socket, &addr->s, - (unsigned)sockaddru_len(*addr), sock_info->address_str.s, - sock_info->port_no, strerror(errno)); + LM_ERR("bind(%x, %p, %d) on [%s]:%d : (%d / %s)\n", sock_info->socket, + &addr->s, (unsigned)sockaddru_len(*addr), + sock_info->address_str.s, sock_info->port_no, errno, + strerror(errno)); if(addr->s.sa_family == AF_INET6) { LM_ERR("might be caused by using a link local address, is " - "'bind_ipv6_link_local' set?\n"); + "'bind_ipv6_link_local' set (now: %d)?\n", + sr_bind_ipv6_link_local); } goto error; }

1 0

[kamailio/kamailio] tls connection in kamailio use too many shared memories (Issue #3980)
by JiangHai2011 24 Sep '24

24 Sep '24

### Description During our tls conn performance test for kamailio, we found fixed shared momory 700MB can only support around 9600 concurrent TLS connections. At the same time, we use nginx for comparison to do the same same tls conn performance test, and the result is 9600 concurrent TLS connections only cost 72MB virtual memory(nginx dont support global shared memory pool for each allocate. it use openssl internal allocate function) Of course, we know, nginx does not use shared memory, and they are not much comparable. Please check if there is any solution to save some shmmem SSL session takes. ### Expected behavior kamailio use less shared memory for more TLS connections #### Actual observed behavior kamailio 's tls connection shared memory consists of tcpconn structure info and tcp_rd_buf and SSL session info, which are all in the same shared memory pool. As our observation, a ssl session info takes too many shmmem---around 130KB #### Debugging Data None #### Log Messages None #### SIP Traffic None ### Possible Solutions None ### Additional Information None * **Operating System**: Linux localhost.localdomain 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 19 22:10:57 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3980 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3980(a)github.com>

3 3

[kamailio/kamailio] tls module will cause too many shared mem blocks, which will cause (Issue #3981)
by JiangHai2011 24 Sep '24

24 Sep '24

### Description during our "4000 tls connections" performance test with kamailio, we found there are too many shared blocks used by TLS module. currently our 4000 tls connections will causes 643389 shared memory blocks(we found in corex.shm_status), ### Troubleshooting None #### Reproduction in our environment, kamailio use TLSF management type for shared memory. our tls_client test tool will establish 4000 tls connections, and we can see 643389 shared memory blocks corex.shm_status. this will cause too many fragments and hard to allocate big blocks any more(our shared memory total size is limited) #### Debugging Data currently we found shm_realloc will cause too many shm blocks and fragments. and only shm_malloc and shm_free will not cause too many shm blocks and fragments. could you please check if there is any solution to reduce this cost #### Log Messages Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bss_mem.c(123) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bss_mem.c(115) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 3 size= 168 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bf_buff.c(49) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 3 size= 12336 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bf_buff.c(60) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 88 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/t1_enc.c(367) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 288 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/buffer/buffer.c(135) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 3 size= 12304 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bf_buff.c(54) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2 size= 8224 bytes from tls: sbufq.h: sbufq_add(84) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 200 size= 11744 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/statem/extensions.c(955) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 77 size= 7096 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bn/bn_blind.c(36) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2145 size= 326672 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/packet_local.h(429) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2128 size= 124848 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/statem/extensions_clnt.c(1376) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2129 size= 128536 bytes from tls: tls_ct_q.h: tls_ct_q_add(58) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4150 size= 358776 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/ec/ec_kmeth.c(75) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 247896 bytes from tls: tls_server.c: tls_complete_init(228) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1010 size= 673712 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_sess.c(110) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4273 size= 965592 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/evp/digest.c(129) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2128 size= 132560 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/statem/../packet_local.h(429) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 256272 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_lib.c(791) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8 size= 480 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bio_meth.c(41) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8 size= 824 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bio_meth.c(38) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 3264 size= 2182216 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_sess.c(72) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1010 size= 227824 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/evp/digest.c(249) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 4500704 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/s3_lib.c(3296) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2127 size= 347904 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c(2648) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1126 size= 68112 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/statem/../packet_local.h(429) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4150 size= 708520 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/ec/ec_lib.c(33) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4238 size= 556896 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/t1_lib.c(1784) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4150 size= 257944 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/ec/ec_lib.c(217) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 2364440 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_cert.c(76) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8545 size= 6346000 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/evp/evp_enc.c(128) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 10659 size= 1181416 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bn/bn_mont.c(232) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 6375 size= 395192 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/t1_lib.c(1811) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4278 size= 529760 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bio/bio_lib.c(73) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 26840720 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_lib.c(691) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 71427088 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/record/ssl3_buffer.c(63) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4787 size= 82144920 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: tcpconn_new(2223) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 70401328 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/record/ssl3_buffer.c(120) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 8192 bytes from core: counters.c: counters_prefork_init(207) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 200 size= 12128 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/statem/../packet_local.h(452) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8300 size= 504512 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/ec/ec_lib.c(662) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4274 size= 258912 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: tls_bio.c(184) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8545 size= 1460752 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/evp/evp_enc.c(42) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 11806 size= 713552 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/evp/digest.c(51) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1824 size= 273608 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bn/bn_lib.c(266) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 3861 size= 2856280 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/tasn_utl.c(147) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4165 size= 752584 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/rsa/rsa_lib.c(52) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 7722 size= 2695432 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/a_bitstr.c(117) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8765 size= 946408 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/x509/x_name.c(358) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2483 size= 146280 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/tasn_new.c(97) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8768 size= 1298752 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/buffer/buffer.c(97) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 11583 size= 697056 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/tasn_new.c(302) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 62814 size= 4067592 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/asn1_lib.c(284) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 53274 size= 3244208 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/asn1_lib.c(316) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8769 size= 532480 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/buffer/buffer.c(35) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8765 size= 524520 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/x509/x_name.c(92) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 57893 size= 4654312 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/asn1/tasn_new.c(122) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 64 size= 3600 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/t1_lib.c(353) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4727 size= 1198104 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/stack/stack.c(198) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8883 size= 701704 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/stack/stack.c(64) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8883 size= 531576 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/stack/stack.c(49) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 8379 size= 652784 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/evp/p_lib.c(142) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 336 size= 22064 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_lib.c(3047) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 80895 size= 7144264 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bn/bn_lib.c(268) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 61401 size= 3765680 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/bn/bn_lib.c(234) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 64 size= 9784 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/dh/dh_lib.c(44) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 336 size= 19320 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/ct/ct_log.c(94) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 4946 size= 571504 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/x509/x509_vpm.c(86) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 336 size= 51104 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/x509/x509_lu.c(162) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 336 size= 43760 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/lhash/lhash.c(59) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 336 size= 180752 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_cert.c(52) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 336 size= 344448 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: ssl/ssl_lib.c(2977) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/ex_data.c(177) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 21 size= 2792 bytes from tls: tls_domain.c: fix_domain(1004) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 3072 bytes from sl: sl_stats.c: init_sl_stats_child(125) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 768 bytes from kex: pkg_stats.c: pkg_proc_stats_init(79) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 5 size= 280 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_clone_str(130) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 712 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_shmize(217) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: pt.c: init_pt(114) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: pt.c: init_pt(109) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 2240 bytes from core: pt.c: init_pt(108) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from outbound: ob_mod.c: mod_init(104) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from utils: conf.c: conf_init(549) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from utils: utils.c: init_shmlock(160) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 61 size= 3416 bytes from core: cfg_parser.c: cfg_parse_str(906) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 21 size= 4568 bytes from tls: tls_domain.c: tls_new_domain(160) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2 size= 112 bytes from tls: tls_domain.c: tls_new_cfg(1369) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_ct_wrq.c: tls_ct_wq_init(49) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_mod.c: mod_init(407) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_mod.c: mod_init(391) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from sl: sl_funcs.c: sl_startup(83) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from sl: sl_stats.c: init_sl_stats(110) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2 size= 112 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_ctx.c: cfg_register_ctx(47) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/init.c(816) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/init.c(66) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 10 size= 5872 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/err/err.c(745) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/engine/eng_lib.c(128) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2 size= 384 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/engine/eng_lib.c(34) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 17458 size= 1216568 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/stack/stack.c(180) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 5 size= 280 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/conf/conf_mod.c(244) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 5 size= 280 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/conf/conf_mod.c(238) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 25994 size= 1573320 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/stack/stack.c(209) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2 size= 17408 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/lhash/lhash.c(225) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 234 size= 13104 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/objects/o_names.c(219) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 3400 size= 190432 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/lhash/lhash.c(109) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 338 size= 59696 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/lhash/lhash.c(51) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 8192 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(6000) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 32768 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(5994) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(5985) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(5978) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(5971) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(5965) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: tcp_main.c: init_tcp(5953) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: usr_avp.c: init_avps(90) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: usr_avp.c: init_avps(89) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 16384 bytes from core: dst_blacklist.c: init_dst_blacklist(437) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: dst_blacklist.c: init_dst_blacklist(430) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 2 size= 112 bytes from core: timer.c: timer_alloc(514) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: dns_cache.c: init_dns_cache(369) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 16384 bytes from core: dns_cache.c: init_dns_cache(361) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: dns_cache.c: init_dns_cache(354) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: dns_cache.c: init_dns_cache(345) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(283) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 16384 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(282) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(281) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(280) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(269) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(237) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 278544 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(220) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(219) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: timer.c: init_timer(206) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 64 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_child_cb_new(830) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(361) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(354) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(347) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(335) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 1 size= 56 bytes from core: cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(323) Jan 19 02:11:10 online_gdms_ssh_mexico_city_20220607 sipproxy[7526]: INFO: <core> [mem/tlsf_malloc.c:1238]: tlsf_sums(): count= 38812 size= 2314968 bytes from tls: tls_init.c: crypto/threads_pthread.c(42) #### SIP Traffic None ### Possible Solutions None ### Additional Information [root@localhost ~]# /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -V version: kamailio 4.4.7 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 09:53:48 Aug 28 2024 with gcc 4.9.4 * **Operating System**: [root@localhost ~]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 3.10.0-1160.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 19 16:18:59 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3981 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3981(a)github.com>

2 2

git:5.8:113ff4b0: pkg/kamailio/deb: support Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble Numbat) [skip ci]
by Victor Seva 23 Sep '24

23 Sep '24

Module: kamailio Branch: 5.8 Commit: 113ff4b080546a7cd7c06f1ebc1ba303e329b309 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/113ff4b080546a7cd7c06f1ebc1ba30… Author: Victor Seva <linuxmaniac(a)torreviejawireless.org> Committer: Victor Seva <linuxmaniac(a)torreviejawireless.org> Date: 2024-09-23T09:01:12+02:00 pkg/kamailio/deb: support Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble Numbat) [skip ci] --- Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/debian/backports/noble Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/changelog Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/compat Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/control Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/copyright Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-autheph-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-berkeley-bin.dirs Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-dnssec-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-outbound-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-secsipid-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-systemd-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-tls-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio-websocket-modules.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.README.Debian Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.default Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.examples Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.init Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.postinst Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/kamailio.service Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/rules Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/source.lintian-overrides Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/source/format Added: pkg/kamailio/deb/noble/watch --- Diff: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/113ff4b080546a7cd7c06f1ebc1ba30… Patch: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/113ff4b080546a7cd7c06f1ebc1ba30…

1 0

[kamailio/kamailio] TM crash when relaying reply, in context of unreachable rtpengine (Issue #3297)
by Alex Balashov 22 Sep '24

22 Sep '24

When relaying this `200 OK` repeatedly with calls to `rtpengine_answer()` failing because all RTPEngines in a set are unreachable... ``` Dec 8 06:24:38 gw kamailio[4823]: ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2960]: select_rtpp_node(): rtpengine failed to select new for calllen=36 callid=8279a4ea-151e-48de-a23c-5840104126de ``` ``` SIP/2.0 200 OK v:SIP/2.0/UDP 10.150.20.20;branch=z9hG4bK03e.e4da444e627bb575ef4f46151729a1fa.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.151.20.108;received=10.151.20.108;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKKQyrBKpp04X0K Record-Route:<sip:10.150.20.20;lr;ftag=emHm2apy95jFe;rtp_relay=1;rtp_group=0> f:"14045551212"<sip:14045551212@10.151.20.108>;tag=emHm2apy95jFe t:<sip:16782001111@internal.evaristesys.com>;tag=tHQt0rDcF7UHK i:8279a4ea-151e-48de-a23c-5840104126de CSeq:60686471 INVITE m:<sip:16782001111@10.160.10.55:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent:VoiceAppServer Allow:INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,INFO,UPDATE,REFER,NOTIFY k:path,replaces u:talk,hold,conference,refer c:application/sdp Content-Disposition:session l:257 v=0 o=DM 1670428117 1670428118 IN IP4 10.160.10.55 s=DM c=IN IP4 10.160.10.55 t=0 0 m=audio 52418 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=rtcp:52419 IN IP4 10.160.10.55 ``` Repeat INVITEs eventually result in a crash. This backtrace is taken from a different server but identical scenario: ``` #0 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4aee56ba80, new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd8b8bbba0, should_relay=0x7ffd8b8bbba4, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, reply=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:1285 1285 && !(inv_through && Trans->uac[branch].last_received<300)) { Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.192.el6.x86_64 jansson-2.11-1.el6.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-5.el6.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-57.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-22.el6.x86_64 libev-4.03-3.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-7.el6.x86_64 libunistring-0.9.3-5.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.20-1.el6_7.2.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 (gdb) where #0 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4aee56ba80, new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd8b8bbba0, should_relay=0x7ffd8b8bbba4, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, reply=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:1285 #1 0x00007f4afd73ab7d in relay_reply (t=0x7f4aee56ba80, p_msg=0x7f4afe40df70, branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:1821 #2 0x00007f4afd740c38 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:2558 #3 0x00000000004b5d6a in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7f4afe40df70, mode=0) at core/forward.c:747 #4 0x00000000004b78c9 in forward_reply (msg=0x7f4afe40df70) at core/forward.c:852 #5 0x000000000054982b in receive_msg ( buf=0xb27700 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nv:SIP/2.0/UDP xxx;branch=z9hG4bK9915.dcfe6d03cb21e6c94a6705adb095c566.0,SIP/2.0/UDP xxx;received=xxx;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKZmZp0NZv3FvQB\r\nRecord-Rout"..., len=984, rcv_info=0x7ffd8b8bc6c0) at core/receive.c:434 #6 0x00000000006658ca in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:541 #7 0x000000000042500f in main_loop () at main.c:1655 #8 0x000000000042c5bb in main (argc=11, argv=0x7ffd8b8bcc88) at main.c:2696 ``` Looks like in the crash frame, `Trans->uac` is `NULL`: ``` (gdb) frame 0 #0 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4aee56ba80, new_code=200, branch=0, should_store=0x7ffd8b8bbba0, should_relay=0x7ffd8b8bbba4, cancel_data=0x7ffd8b8bbe40, reply=0x7f4afe40df70) at t_reply.c:1285 1285 && !(inv_through && Trans->uac[branch].last_received<300)) { (gdb) print Trans->uac $1 = (struct ua_client *) 0x0 ``` I have seen this crash from time to time, though it is infrequent. It always seems to occur when there are problems reaching RTPEngine in a timely fashion. This is on Kamailio 5.2.4:de9a03, which I know has long fallen off the back of the maintenance train. However, line 1386 of `t_reply.c` in `master:HEAD` shows that the code is no different now: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/tm/t_reply.c#L… Of course, it's possible that something upstream has changed so as to prevent this state. Otherwise, I suppose a null pointer safety check for `Trans->uac` is recommended. I'd be happy to submit a patch, just wasn't sure if the feeling was more that this should be resolved higher up the call stack. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3297 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3297(a)github.com>

2 3

[kamailio/kamailio] core/tcp_main: Match protocol when lookup tcp/tls connections (PR #3810)
by Xenofon Karamanos 21 Sep '24

21 Sep '24

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [x] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [x] Related to issue [reported in lists](https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-users@lists.k… #### Description  This PR aims to fix a bug/security issue where data that was supposed to be encrypted and transferred through TLS, were transferred instead with TCP protocol. More information and how to replicate can be found in the above [issue](https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-users@lists.k… in list. This PR suggests using also the protocol to match if a TCP connection exists, and when doing connection lookups, otherwise, it might return a wrong connection, ie a TCP one when we are asking for a TLS one (a case when source ip/port and dest IP are same but dest port is set 0 (wildcard) ). `tcpconn_get` was left unchanged due to being used by some modules and not wanting to break them. Please advise whether it should be beneficial to also change it. In some cases like, `tcpconn_add_alias` and `tcpconn_get` we used the `PROTO_NONE` which preserves the original behavior. `tcpconn_add_alias` we do have the protocol available, should it be also used? `tcpconn_get` does not have the protocol available unless we pass it as an argument. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3810 -- Commit Summary -- * tcp_main: Add protocol argument for searching tcp/tls connections * tcp_main: Add proto argument to tcpconn_exists function * tcp_main: Update comment docs * core/forward: Match protocol when forwarding * tcp_main: Match wss protocol -- File Changes -- M src/core/forward.h (3) M src/core/tcp_conn.h (3) M src/core/tcp_main.c (43) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3810.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3810.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3810 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3810(a)github.com>

5 10

git:5.7:85988887: tm: remove extra + used before MAXFWD_HEADER_LEN
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 19 Sep '24

19 Sep '24

Module: kamailio Branch: 5.7 Commit: 859888876418605abdffcc57bea8b5988860476d URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/859888876418605abdffcc57bea8b59… Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Date: 2024-09-19T08:56:09+02:00 tm: remove extra + used before MAXFWD_HEADER_LEN (cherry picked from commit 307d6db88c218ffd5dc9d6e7de6425ac4ef24748) (cherry picked from commit 672c3e75c4679681c1ddfb42f852682d93e42c31) --- Modified: src/modules/tm/t_msgbuilder.c --- Diff: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/859888876418605abdffcc57bea8b59… Patch: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/859888876418605abdffcc57bea8b59… --- diff --git a/src/modules/tm/t_msgbuilder.c b/src/modules/tm/t_msgbuilder.c index 6ff3d8d61d5..5f0f9575f4d 100644 --- a/src/modules/tm/t_msgbuilder.c +++ b/src/modules/tm/t_msgbuilder.c @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ char *build_dlg_ack(struct sip_msg *rpl, struct cell *Trans, /* headers */ *len += Trans->from_hdr.len + Trans->callid_hdr.len + to->len - + Trans->cseq_hdr_n.len + 1 + ACK_LEN + +MAXFWD_HEADER_LEN + + Trans->cseq_hdr_n.len + 1 + ACK_LEN + MAXFWD_HEADER_LEN + CRLF_LEN; /* copy'n'paste Route headers */

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev September 2024