sr-dev March 2025

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

10 participants
178 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] cmake format options and naming styles (Issue #4075)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 06 May '25

06 May '25

Discussion to define cmake format options and coding/naming styles. It is better to define most of them now to have coherency in the future. Started from the discussion on #4066. Comment with what you would like to have, describing when useful why your proposal is a good/better option. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4075 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4075(a)github.com>

4 8

[kamailio/kamailio] ims_dialog: missing srdb1 schema definition (Issue #4100)
by Victor Seva 06 May '25

06 May '25

there's no ``kamailio-ims_dialog.xml`` at ``src/lib/srdb1/schema`` but there's a manual file created at ``utils/kamctl/mysql/ims_dialog-create.sql`` Same thing for: - ``utils/kamctl/mysql/ims_charging-create.sql`` - ``utils/kamctl/mysql/ims_usrloc_pcscf-create.sql`` - ``utils/kamctl/mysql/ims_usrloc_scscf-create.sql`` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4100 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4100(a)github.com>

3 8

[kamailio/kamailio] Topoh module does not hide 180 Ringing and 200 Ok to the caller UE in IMS config (Issue #4164)
by Farzaneh Soltanzadeh 05 May '25

05 May '25

Fr-Soltanzadeh created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4164) ### Description In a IMS lab using Kamailio PCSCF, ICSCF and SCSCF default configs, I have used TOPOH module in PCSCF for topology hiding. Topoh config is as follows: ``` modparam("topoh", "mask_key", "my-key") modparam("topoh", "mask_ip", "127.0.0.2") modparam("topoh", "sanity_checks", 1) ``` As shown in attached traffic, SCSCF IP is not hided in 180 ringing and 200ok messages to the caller. In invite, ack and bye messages hiding is performed well. [topoh.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/19086420/topoh.zip) [topoh.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/19086428/topoh.zip) [topoh.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/19086431/topoh.zip)  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4164 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4164(a)github.com>

3 4

[kamailio/kamailio] secfilter‌: support remove rule in Whitelist and Blacklist (PR #4089)
by AsedMorteza 30 Apr '25

30 Apr '25

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description ##### **Summary** This update introduces new functionality to the `secfilter` module, enabling the removal of entries from both the Blacklist and Whitelist. It also includes automatic detection and removal of duplicate values from these lists. ##### **Details** * Users can now remove specific entries from the Blacklist or Whitelist based on type (e.g., IP, domain, user) and a given value. * Supports removal of single or multiple matching entries in one operation. ##### **Benefits** - Improves the usability and flexibility of the `secfilter` module by allowing fine-grained control over list management. - Ensures that the Blacklist and Whitelist are kept clean and free from redundant entries. - Enhances performance by reducing unnecessary duplication in the lists. ##### Testing This feature was tested using `kmcmd` commands in various scenarios: - Removing the **first element** in the list. - Removing an element from the **middle** of the list. - Removing the **last element** in the list. - Removing **all matching elements** in the list. In all cases, the commands worked correctly, and the lists were updated and cleaned as expected. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089 -- Commit Summary -- * secfilter‌: support remove rule in Whitelist and Blacklist -- File Changes -- M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter.c (8) M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter.h (3) M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter_db.c (106) M src/modules/secfilter/secfilter_rpc.c (95) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4089(a)github.com>

6 11

[kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine: select node with weight=0 if no other nodes online (Issue #4180)
by sergey-safarov 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

sergey-safarov created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4180) ### Description I have installed two `rtpengine` instances and want to use them as an `active backup`. I want to use `backup` only when `active` is unavailable. Closest settings for this rtpengine node `weight` and want to use settings like ``` MariaDB [kamailio]> select * from rtpengine; +----+-------+---------------------------------+--------+----------+---------------------+ | id | setid | url | weight | disabled | stamp | +----+-------+---------------------------------+--------+----------+---------------------+ | 1 | 0 | udp6:[2005:84c0:bf:11::20]:2223 | 1 | 0 | 1900-01-01 00:00:01 | | 2 | 0 | udp6:[2005:84c0:bf:11::21]:2223 | 0 | 0 | 1900-01-01 00:00:01 | +----+-------+---------------------------------+--------+----------+---------------------+ ``` But in case `weight=0` node is not selected and handled as disabled. It will be fine do not use rtpengine nodes with `weight=0` when other rtpengine with `weight!=0` are available. But if no other nodes are available, use `weight=0` nodes as last resort. ### Expected behavior Do not use rtpengine nodes with `weight=0` when other rtpengine with `weight!=0` are available. But if no other nodes are available, use `weight=0` nodes as last resort. #### Actual observed behavior The node is not selected and handled as disabled when `weight=0`. #### Log Messages ``` rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3430]: rtpp_test(): rtpengine instance <udp6:[2005:84c0:bf:11::21]:2223> found, support for it enabled rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3883]: select_rtpp_node(): rtpengine failed to select new for calllen=27 callid=1-10824@2005:84c0:bf:11::22 rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3183]: rtpp_function_call(): no available proxies ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4180 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4180(a)github.com>

3 2

[kamailio/kamailio] WSS-connections show up as <null> in $tls_version and $tls_cypher_info (Issue #4167)
by Christian Berger 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

ChristianBergerSipgate created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4167) Hi, we have found a potential bug. The pseudo variables return null for WSS connections. Example config: `xlog("L_INFO", "<mainLogic> REGISTER: TLS or WSS detected: fU=$fU tls_version=$tls_version tls_cipher_info=$tls_cipher_info ua=$ua\n");` Log output: `Mar 7 08:37:28 sip-tcploadbalancer01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1268940]: { "level": "ERROR", "module": "tls", "file": "tls_select.c", "line": 131, "function": "get_cur_connection", "message": "Transport protocol is not TLS (bug in config)\n" } Mar 7 08:37:28 sip-tcploadbalancer01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1268940]: { "level": "INFO", "module": "tls", "file": "tls_select.c", "line": 310, "function": "get_version", "message": "TLS connection not found in select_version\n" } Mar 7 08:37:28 sip-tcploadbalancer01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1268940]: { "level": "ERROR", "module": "tls", "file": "tls_select.c", "line": 131, "function": "get_cur_connection", "message": "Transport protocol is not TLS (bug in config)\n" } Mar 7 08:37:28 sip-tcploadbalancer01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1268940]: { "level": "INFO", "module": "tls", "file": "tls_select.c", "line": 201, "function": "get_cipher", "message": "TLS connection not found in select_cipher\n" } Mar 7 08:37:28 sip-tcploadbalancer01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1268940]: { "level": "INFO", "module": "xlog", "file": "xlog.c", "line": 278, "function": "", "message": "<mainLogic> REGISTER: TLS or WSS detected: fU=1125411e0 tls_version=<null> tls_cipher_info=<null> ua=webphone\n" }` As you can see both tls_version and tls_cipher_info return <null> even though the underlying connection is via WSS. We have looked into it, and it seems like `get_cur_connection` in `modules/tls/tls_select.c` only checks for TLS, but not WSS. ``` struct tcp_connection *get_cur_connection(struct sip_msg *msg) { struct tcp_connection *c; if(_tls_pv_con != 0) return _tls_pv_con; if(msg->rcv.proto != PROTO_TLS) { ERR("Transport protocol is not TLS (bug in config)\n"); return 0; } c = tcpconn_get(msg->rcv.proto_reserved1, 0, 0, 0, cfg_get(tls, tls_cfg, con_lifetime)); if(c && c->type != PROTO_TLS) { ERR("Connection found but is not TLS\n"); tcpconn_put(c); return 0; } return c; } ``` We think that checking for `PROTO_WSS` might solve the issue. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4167 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4167(a)github.com>

3 3

[kamailio/kamailio] Crash involving rtpengine (Issue #4179)
by Joe Mordica 28 Apr '25

28 Apr '25

jmordica created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4179) ### Description Kamailio crash involving rtpengine ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` GNU gdb (Debian 13.1-3) 13.1 Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: <https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... Reading symbols from /usr/sbin/kamailio... Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/20/dc8be8c0aa02eba62b84db3c283789f068fb79.debug... warning: Can't open file /dev/zero (deleted) during file-backed mapping note processing [New LWP 37] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `kamailio -DD -E -m 8000 -M 512 -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -P /var/run/kamail'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 44 ./nptl/pthread_kill.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 tid = <optimized out> ret = 0 pd = <optimized out> old_mask = {__val = {0}} ret = <optimized out> #1 0x00007f0a2dd31f1f in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78 No locals. #2 0x00007f0a2dce2fb2 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 ret = <optimized out> #3 0x00007f0a2dccd472 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79 save_stage = 1 act = {__sigaction_handler = {sa_handler = 0x20, sa_sigaction = 0x20}, sa_mask = {__val = {1880844493789993498, 1880844493789993498, 1880844493789993498, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2314885530818453536, 2314885530818453536, 2314885530818453536, 2314885530818453536, 0, 0, 0, 0, 94814674008008}}, sa_flags = 365707264, sa_restorer = 0x563bc3029320 <log_prefix_buf>} #4 0x0000563bc2e27414 in qm_debug_check_frag (qm=qm@entry=0x7f0815cc4000, f=f@entry=0x7f0834533950, file=file@entry=0x7f0a0a93420f "rtpengine: rtpengine_hash.c", line=line@entry=528, eline=eline@entry=546, efile=0x563bc2f6abcc "core/mem/q_malloc.c") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:132 p = <optimized out> __func__ = "qm_debug_check_frag" #5 0x0000563bc2e282b9 in qm_free (qmp=<optimized out>, p=0x7f0834533990, file=0x7f0a0a93420f "rtpengine: rtpengine_hash.c", func=0x7f0a0a935040 <__func__.2> "rtpengine_hash_table_free_entry", line=528, mname=0x7f0a0a92a000 "rtpengine") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:546 qm = <optimized out> f = 0x7f0834533950 size = <optimized out> next = <optimized out> prev = <optimized out> __func__ = "qm_free" #6 0x0000563bc2e2d51f in qm_shm_free (qmp=<optimized out>, p=0x7f0834533990, file=0x7f0a0a93420f "rtpengine: rtpengine_hash.c", func=0x7f0a0a935040 <__func__.2> "rtpengine_hash_table_free_entry", line=528, mname=0x7f0a0a92a000 "rtpengine") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:1532 No locals. #7 0x00007f0a0a922adb in rtpengine_hash_table_free_entry (entry=0x7f08263a3f80) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_hash.c:528 __func__ = "rtpengine_hash_table_free_entry" --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--info locals #8 0x00007f0a0a927dd4 in rtpengine_hash_table_lookup (callid=..., viabranch=..., op=op@entry=OP_OFFER) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_hash.c:428 entry = 0x7f08263a3f80 last_entry = 0x7f08174e0450 hash_index = 87 node = <optimized out> __func__ = "rtpengine_hash_table_lookup" #9 0x00007f0a0a90ec2b in select_rtpp_node_old (do_test=1, op=OP_OFFER, viabranch=..., callid=...) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c:3810 node = 0x0 node = <optimized out> __func__ = "select_rtpp_node_old" __llevel = <optimized out> __kld = <optimized out> __llevel = <optimized out> __kld = <optimized out> #10 select_rtpp_node (callid=..., viabranch=..., queried_nodes_list=0x7f0a0de84430, queried_nodes=queried_nodes@entry=0, op=OP_OFFER, do_test=1) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c:3864 node = 0x0 __func__ = "select_rtpp_node" #11 0x00007f0a0a91228a in rtpp_function_call (bencbuf=bencbuf@entry=0x7ffeb1d5bea0, msg=msg@entry=0x7f0a0de94350, op=<optimized out>, flags_str=<optimized out>, body_out=body_out@entry=0x7ffeb1d5be80, cl_field=cl_field@entry=0x7ffeb1d5be90) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c:3178 ng_flags = {via = -1, to = 1, packetize = 0, transport = 256, directional = 0, dict = 0x7f0a0de98b78, flags = 0x7f0a0de98d08, direction = 0x7f0a0de98e68, replace = 0x7f0a0de98ec8, rtcp_mux = 0x7f0a0de98f28, sdes = 0x7f0a0de98f88, t38 = 0x7f0a0de99098, received_from = 0x7f0a0de98e08, codec = 0x7f0a0de990f8, codec_strip = 0x0, codec_offer = 0x0, codec_transcode = 0x0, codec_mask = 0x0, codec_set = 0x0, codec_except = 0x0, codec_accept = 0x0, codec_consume = 0x0, call_id = { s = 0x563bc30e195f <buf+287> "5783b150-6ad4-4e55-9555-decf4048c8fb\r\nCSeq: 23471 INVITE\r\nAllow: OPTIONS, REGISTER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, MESSAGE, INFO, REFER\r\nk: replaces, histinfo\r\nX-UNIQUEI"..., len = 36}, from_tag = { s = 0x563bc30e18fb <buf+187> "47d9d572-1f09-46bf-b966-16988c17cf56\r\nt: <sip:02-5333@10.142.0.56>\r\nm: <sip:vxm@10.52.7.2:5081>\r\ni: 5783b150-6ad4-4e55-9555-decf4048c8fb\r\nCSeq: 23471 INVITE\r\nAllow: OPTIONS, REGISTER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIF"..., len = 36}, to_tag = {s = 0x0, len = 0}} item = <optimized out> resp = <optimized out> viabranch = {s = 0x7f0a0dd15720 "z9hG4bKPje1c3efee-2490-4035-9e2e-b124ec630b820", len = 46} body = { s = 0x563bc30e1b33 <buf+755> "v=0\r\no=- 1936793669 1936793669 IN IP4 10.52.7.2\r\ns=VXM\r\nc=IN IP4 10.52.7.2\r\nt=0 0\r\nm=audio 18690 RTP/AVP 0 101\r\na=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000\r\na=fmtp:101 0-16\r\na=ptime:20\r\na=maxptime:140\r\na=sendre"..., len = 204} --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--list error = <optimized out> ret = 1 queried_nodes = 0 cont_type = <optimized out> node = <optimized out> cp = <optimized out> pv_val = {rs = {s = 0x7f083a53d3c0 "p", len = -1025336010}, ri = 47244640256, flags = 1} md5 = "\004\220\361\302;V\000\000\260r\366\302;V", '\000' <repeats 11 times>, "\345\323A\270\253\205\301" branch_buf = "\210\033\016\303;V\000\000\177W\315\302;V\000\000\216\033\016\303;V\000\000\000\345\323A\270\253\205\301\224\033\016\303;V\000\000\000\345\323A\270\253\205\301\220\201\351\r\n\177\000\000\000\345" result = <optimized out> t = <optimized out> branch_idx = <optimized out> __func__ = "rtpp_function_call" select_node = <optimized out> #12 0x00007f0a0a917346 in rtpp_function_call_ok (bencbuf=bencbuf@entry=0x7ffeb1d5bea0, msg=msg@entry=0x7f0a0de94350, op=<optimized out>, flags_str=<optimized out>, body=body@entry=0x7ffeb1d5be80, cl_field=cl_field@entry=0x7ffeb1d5be90) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c:3371 ret = <optimized out> __func__ = "rtpp_function_call_ok" #13 0x00007f0a0a919708 in rtpengine_offer_answer (msg=0x7f0a0de94350, flags=<optimized out>, op=<optimized out>, more=0) at ./src/modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c:4495 bencbuf = {pieces = 0x7f0a0de9a270, free_list = 0x0, error = 0} dict = <optimized out> body = {s = 0x7f0a0de94350 "\233@\006", len = 1104405760} newbody = <optimized out> anchor = <optimized out> pv_val = {rs = {s = 0x0, len = 177318755}, ri = 0, flags = 4} cur_body = {s = 0x0, len = 0} cl_field = {s = 0x0, len = 0} cl_repl = {s = 0x0, len = 0} __func__ = "rtpengine_offer_answer" error_free = <optimized out> #14 0x0000563bc2c77195 in sr_kemi_exec_func (ket=ket@entry=0x7f0a0a93d5c8 <sr_kemi_rtpengine_exports+72>, msg=<optimized out>, pno=pno@entry=1, vps=<optimized out>) at core/kemiexec.c:84 ``` #### Log Messages  ``` CRITICAL: {1 23471 INVITE 5783b150-6ad4-4e55-9555-decf4048c8fb} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:148]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail overwritten(c0c00a0d, abcdefed)[0x7f0834533950:0x7f0834533990]! Memory allocator was called from rtpengine: rtpengine_hash.c:528. Fragment marked by rtpengine: ../../core/parser/../ut.h:891. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:546. CRITICAL: {1 23471 INVITE 5783b150-6ad4-4e55-9555-decf4048c8fb} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:156]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail overwritten [0x7f08345335b0:0x7f08345335f0] - fragment marked by core: core/msg_translator.c:2305 ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.8.5 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 12.2.0 ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Release: 12 Codename: bookworm Linux gke-us-east1-external-sip-4b67daea-x3rj 5.15.0-1020-gke #25-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 27 05:38:18 UTC 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4179 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4179(a)github.com>

4 8

[kamailio/kamailio] Allow single quotes in From name (Issue #3984)
by ThomasSevestre 28 Apr '25

28 Apr '25

### Description `secf_check_sqli_all();` block requests when a single quote is present in From name : ``` From: "O'Reilly" <sip:100@example.net>;tag=abcd ``` Since single quotes are frequent in names. It makes it difficult to use this function. ### Possible Solutions A solution would be to skip single quote check in From name. I'll write the PR if you are OK with this solution -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3984 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3984(a)github.com>

5 10

[kamailio/kamailio] siptrace: sip_trace_mode("d") not working (Issue #4178)
by c.long 27 Apr '25

27 Apr '25

longchun4835 created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4178)  ### Description Using function sip_trace_mode() with parameter d to enable dialog tracing mode logs: ``` BUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:1671]: add_info_xavp(): URI should be in raw format here ERROR: siptrace [siptrace.c:888]: sip_trace_helper(): failed to serialize siptrace info! Won't trace dialog! ``` ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction my module parameters: ``` #!ifdef WITH_HOMER loadmodule "siptrace.so" modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri", HOMER_URL) modparam("siptrace", "hep_mode_on", 1) modparam("siptrace", "trace_to_database", 0) modparam("siptrace", "trace_flag", 22) modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1) modparam("siptrace", "hep_version", 3) modparam("siptrace", "hep_capture_id", HOMER_HEP_ID) #!endif ... request_route { ... if (is_method("INVITE")) { sip_trace_mode("d"); } } ``` ### Possible Solutions I checked the source code and found that the issue occurs when sip_trace_helper() is called inside the ki_sip_trace_mode() function, with the third parameter (duri) set to NULL. I don’t quite understand the logic behind passing NULL does this mean that the 'D' parameter will never working when calling sip_trace_mode()? Additionally, I have another question: in the sip_trace_helper() function, why does it call trace_transaction() instead of trace_dialog() when strace_type == SIPTRACE_DIALOG? ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) a004cf flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: a004cf compiled on 09:14:30 Jan 23 2025 with gcc 8.3.1 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4178 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4178(a)github.com>

3 2

[kamailio/kamailio] Handling Duplicate Values in secfilter Module's kamcmd Commands (Issue #4091)
by AsedMorteza 26 Apr '25

26 Apr '25

**Description** The `secfilter` module in `kamcmd` currently allows duplicate entries when adding values to certain lists (e.g., blacklists, whitelists). This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential inconsistencies. Could you clarify the reason behind accepting duplicate values? Recently, I submitted a pull request to add delete commands to the `secfilter` module #4089. When a user, for example, executes: `kamcmd secfilter.del_bl user 1005` I iterate through the entire list to ensure all occurrences of `1005` are removed, as I realized duplicates might exist. This is inefficient and could be avoided by preventing duplicates in the first place. **Proposed Solutions** 1. **Prevent Duplicates in Existing `add` Commands:** * I can modify existing `add` commands to directly prevent the addition of duplicate values. This would simplify future operations and improve performance. 2. **Introduce New `add_unique` Commands:** * I can maintain the current `add` commands for backward compatibility. * I can introduce new `add_unique` commands (e.g., `secfilter.add_bl_unique`) that explicitly reject duplicate entries. **Recommendation** I recommend implementing the first solution (preventing duplicates in existing `add` commands) as it provides the most straightforward and efficient approach. **Further Considerations** * Consider adding a check for duplicates during the `add` operation and returning an appropriate error message if a duplicate is encountered. * Document the behavior of duplicate values in the `secfilter` module's documentation. **I would appreciate your feedback and guidance on the best course of action.** -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4091 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4091(a)github.com>

6 9

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev March 2025