THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task.
FS#100 - Assignment operators don't work
User who did this - Alex Hermann (axlh)
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=100
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
xadhoom created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4252)
### Description
A kamailio cluster which replicates presentities and usrloc via dmq may incur into duplicated presentities and notifications depending on config.
The problematic setup, where each kamailio node has the following setup:
- presence enabled with dmq
- usrloc distributed with dmq
- pua_reginfo used to publish reginfo to self
Really is multiplicated by the numbers of nodes, so 4 nodes -> 4 times notifications and presentities.
### Troubleshooting
The problem arise because pua_reginfo hooks to usrloc and every time a "save()" is done a publish is sent, which is by design. Then the handled publish generates a presentity which is replicated via dmq from presence module.
Now, if also usrloc is replicated via DMQ, the handling of such message still trigger the hook, causing another publish with generates a different presentiy, since is new and the e-tag is different.
This causes subscribers to receive <number of nodes> notifications on every status change.
### Possible Solutions
The approach can be to optionally disable that hook (basically making pua_reginfo skipping publish) when handling a message via DMQ, so the usrloc replica is just saved.
In other modules, like pua_dialoginfo or pua_usrloc this can be already done, since publishing can be controlled from script.
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version**
```
6.0.1
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4252
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4252(a)github.com>
sergey-safarov created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4241)
### Description
In the GitHub Actions present Alpine Docker image build error
```
tar (child): kamailio_min-without_os_files.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
```
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/actions/runs/14722992691/job/413201110…
With high probability, this does not work
I will work to fix this, but if possible, it will be fine to switch to use `cmake` for Alpine Docker image.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4241
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4241(a)github.com>
IgorrG created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4268)
### Description
We use RPC dlg.end_dlg command to terminate dialog. In most cases it does operate properly and send BYE from kamailio to both sides of dialog (as show on screenshot).

We found that in some cases we have only first BYE sent to calling party. Second BYE never sent, when called party tries to terminate call by timeout it get responded with 481.


In logs we have such warning:
мая 27 15:11:46 service-proxy.iqtek.ru kamailio[3518388]: 2(3518388) WARNING: {1 1 BYE 541d3f2c-43fd-43b6-af24-bad1fbf85eb6} dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1343]: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog for BYE with route param 'e1e.4f22' [3614:8948] and call-id '541d3f2c-43fd-43b6-af24-bad1fbf85eb6'
We also found that in this case this warning shown in logs 0.04 seconds after kamailio receive 200ok.
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
# ./kamailio -V
version: kamailio 5.8.6 (x86_64/linux) fb71db
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: fb71db
compiled on 17:38:27 May 26 2025 with gcc 12.2.0
```
* **Operating System**:
```
# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Release: 12
Codename: bookworm
# uname -a
Linux rtp-kamailio2 6.1.0-32-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.129-1 (2025-03-06) x86_64 GNU/Linux
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4268
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4268(a)github.com>
IgorrG created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4266)
### Description
While implementing mid-register inspired by pull request (https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3360) we found the case when it goes impossible to handle responses for registrar servers. In case some of registrars busy and respond with 401 after 200ok received - it is not possible using any routes and configuration options to handle responses received in branch transactions.
According to documentation I think that setting wt_timer should allow to absorb and handle responses on failure-route while transaction kept in memory. In fact wt_timer does not affect handling responses in any way.

### Troubleshooting
To reproduce this case we have configured sipp to response instant with 200ok on registration request.
#### Reproduction
To reproduce issue SIPP could be setup as one of the dispatcher nodes with instant 200ok reply to register. Kamailio should use following configuration snippet: https://github.com/ovoshlook/kamailio-mid-registrar-config-snippets/blob/ma…
#### Log Messages
REGISTER|401tm [t_lookup.c:912]: t_reply_matching(): t_reply_matching: hash 12337 label 0 branch 1
REGISTER|401tm [t_lookup.c:986]: t_reply_matching(): reply (0x7f1fc67f83a8) matched an active transaction (T=0x7f1fc0f0f740)!
REGISTER|401tm [t_lookup.c:1122]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f1fc67f83a8) id=13/1915035 global id=13/1915035 T end=0x7f1fc0f0f740
REGISTER|401tm [t_reply.c:2363]: reply_received(): transaction found - T:0x7f1fc0f0f740 branch:1
REGISTER|401tm [t_reply.c:2376]: reply_received(): original status uas=200, uac[1]=0 local=0 is_invite=0)
REGISTER|401tm [t_reply.c:1363]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=200, new_code=401
REGISTER|401tm [t_reply.c:1374]: t_should_relay_response(): final reply already sent
REGISTER|401tm [t_reply.c:1625]: t_should_relay_response(): finished with rps discarded - uas status: 200
### Possible Solutions
<!--
If you found a solution or workaround for the issue, describe it. Ideally, provide a pull request with a fix.
-->
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version**
```
version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux)
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown
compiled on 16:35:08 Jun 5 2023 with gcc 10.2.1
```
* **Operating System**:
```
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Release: 11
Codename: bullseye
Linux pbxKamaTest 5.10.0-23-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.179-1 (2023-05-12) x86_64 GNU/Linux
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4266
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4266(a)github.com>
### Description
After carrying out some load tests using the `Websocket` module, I noticed that sometimes the `websocket:closed` event is not triggered.
This problem seems to be particularly noticeable when the load is high and simultaneous. Example: 1000 records simultaneously.
In the tests carried out, I realized that the number of times the event is not triggered is small, in the order of [1-10]/1000.
I check that when I do a `ws.dump` I don't have any active connections, and I confirm that they are all effectively cleaned (`netstat -ano | grep 8061`).
However, the event is not triggered for some connections.
I can see this in the logs, and also when i display the content of an hash table, i'm dropping key inside `websocket:closed` event.
### Troubleshooting
The troubleshooting was simplistic, i.e. I ran the same test n times, and validated that the event was triggered for all connections, the number of `ws` connections listed by `Kamailio`, and the open connections.
#### Reproduction
To reproduce, we can use any mechanism that emulates the use of the `Websocket` module.
For example, I used the `sipexer` tool to create a `wss` connection with `Kamailio`, forcing simultaneous registrations.
Example command: `sipexer -cb -mt register -ex 60 -au <user> -ap <pass> -fuser example -fd mydomain -wso https://10.0.0.12:10000 -ruri sip:kamailio -su wss://kamailio:8061`
Kamailio TLS listener:
`listen=tls:10.0.0.12:8061 advertise PUBLIC_IP`
Websocket module:
```
loadmodule "websocket.so"
tcp_accept_no_cl=yes
```
```
event_route[websocket:closed] {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "WebSocket connection closed $proto:$si:$sp\n");
<I also delete where a htable key>
}
```
#### Debugging Data
```
[root@ ~]$ prcmd ws.dump
{
connections: {
}
info: {
wscounter: 0
truncated: no
}
}
[root@ ~]$ netstat -ano | grep 8061
tcp 0 0 10.0.0.12:8061 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN off (0.00/0/0)
[root ~]$ prcmd htable.dump wsauth | grep "name" | wc -l
3
[root ~]$ cat /var/log/kamailio.log | grep "WebSocket connection closed" | wc -l
997
[root ~]$ cat /var/log/proxy-registrar/proxy-registrar.log | grep "ERR" | grep "WAR" | wc -l
0
```
#### Log Messages
Nothing relevant.
#### SIP Traffic
Nothing relevant here, the SIP Flow is OK.
### Additional Information
```
version: kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) a004cf-dirty
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: a004cf -dirty
compiled on 23:17:27 Jun 7 2024 with gcc 4.8.5
```
* **Operating System**:
```
CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3950
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3950(a)github.com>
QuincyGao created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4190)
<!--
Kamailio Project uses GitHub Issues only for bugs in the code or feature requests. Please use this template only for bug reports.
If you have questions about using Kamailio or related to its configuration file, ask on sr-users mailing list:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/sr-users.lists.kamailio…
If you have questions about developing extensions to Kamailio or its existing C code, ask on sr-dev mailing list:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/sr-dev.lists.kamailio.o…
Please try to fill this template as much as possible for any issue. It helps the developers to troubleshoot the issue.
Note that an issue report may be closed automatically after about 2 months
if there is no interest from developers or community users on pursuing it, being
considered expired. In such case, it can be reopened by writing a comment that includes
the token `/notexpired`. About two weeks before considered expired, the issue is
marked with the label `stale`, trying to notify the submitter and everyone else
that might be interested in it. To remove the label `stale`, write a comment that
includes the token `/notstale`. Also, any comment postpone the `expire` timeline,
being considered that there is interest in pursuing the issue.
If there is no content to be filled in a section, the entire section can be removed.
You can delete the comments from the template sections when filling.
You can delete next line and everything above before submitting (it is a comment).
-->
### Description
<!--
Explain what you did, what you expected to happen, and what actually happened.
-->
I want to use opensips as SBC, When the agent registers to kamailio, the contact content is modified to the ip and port of kamailio, and then Register is forwarded to the agent.
remove_hf("Contact") can't remove the whole Contact( field, vlue).
here is my config:
```
route[REGISTRAR] {
if (!is_method("REGISTER")) return;
if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) {
setbflag(FLB_NATB);
#!ifdef WITH_NATSIPPING
# do SIP NAT pinging
setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING);
#!endif
}
fix_nated_contact();
if (!save("location","0x02")) {
#if (!save("location")) {
sl_reply_error();
}
$fs="udp:172.16.4.111:5461";
$du="sip:172.16.4.114:5060";
remove_hf("Contact");
$var(contact) = "Contact: <sip:" +$fU+"@"+"172.16.4.111:5461>;expires=120\r\n" ;
append_hf("$var(contact)");
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
```
here is the sip message:
```
2025/03/26 16:36:07.706093 172.16.4.111:5461 -> 172.16.4.114:5060
REGISTER sip:172.16.4.111:5460 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.4.111:5461;branch=z9hG4bKfc7e.d2df36f3b5681afeb71e442e645de38d.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.80.3:49309;received=172.16.80.3;rport=49309;branch=z9hG4bKPj8ab8bd1d3c3a4c1bb0cd639540fa3183
Max-Forwards: 69
From: <sip:1008@172.16.4.111>;tag=95f7f5601f8b40458a1efe6923ab0a29
To: <sip:1008@172.16.4.111>
Call-ID: f84b643f5d284d18a0d8175e1ef4d747
CSeq: 33264 REGISTER
User-Agent: MicroSIP/3.21.6
sip:1008@172.16.80.3:49309;obExpires: 120
Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS
Content-Length: 0
Contact: <sip:1008@172.16.4.111:5461>;expires=120
```
you can see the problem is that: `sip:1008@172.16.80.3:49309;obExpires: 120` ,
`sip:1008@172.16.80.3:49309` is the value of the Contact field after fix_nated_contact().
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
<!--
If the issue can be reproduced, describe how it can be done.
-->
#### Debugging Data
<!--
If you got a core dump, use gdb to extract troubleshooting data - full backtrace,
local variables and the list of the code at the issue location.
gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile
bt full
info locals
list
If you are familiar with gdb, feel free to attach more of what you consider to
be relevant.
-->
```
(paste your debugging data here)
```
#### Log Messages
<!--
Check the syslog file and if there are relevant log messages printed by Kamailio, add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
(paste your log messages here)
```
#### SIP Traffic
<!--
If the issue is exposed by processing specific SIP messages, grab them with ngrep or save in a pcap file, then add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
(paste your sip traffic here)
```
### Possible Solutions
<!--
If you found a solution or workaround for the issue, describe it. Ideally, provide a pull request with a fix.
-->
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
version: kamailio 5.8.5 (x86_64/linux)
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id:
compiled on 11:27:01 Mar 21 2025 with gcc 4.8.5
```
* **Operating System**:
<!--
Details about the operating system, the type: Linux (e.g.,: Debian 8.4, Ubuntu 16.04, CentOS 7.1, ...), MacOS, xBSD, Solaris, ...;
Kernel details (output of `lsb_release -a` and `uname -a`)
-->
```
Centos7.9
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4190
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4190(a)github.com>