10 Nov
2014
10 Nov
'14
10:19 a.m.
On 10/11/14 16:07, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
On 10 Nov 2014, at 16:04, Victor Seva
<linuxmaniac(a)torreviejawireless.org> wrote:
To clarify, I am ok with reverting master and anyhow expect to be done
as some point, because I don't want to embed any library. My remark was
that I don't find it like the same urgency as I wanted for branch 4.2,
being ok for me if people want to analyze more on this direction. My
vote will be for no embedded libs without a real and major reason.
But as people prefer to have master clean, then the current approach can
be kept in a personal or tmp branch for availability in case anyone
wants to look deeper at it.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 24-27, Berlin - http://www.asipto.com
On 11/10/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
From my point of view master is not OK. Please revert on master too.
If kazoo needs newer lib versions then it will not be built for the
distros that doesn't have such versions.
I see no problem on that.
I agree with Victor.
If you want to make it simple for people who wants to build you
can add stuff to the Makefile so people can run "make install-lib-depend" or
something
to checkout the source code.
Including other projects into one project is never good. Asterisk had a lot of issues
with Debian packaging since it at a point included other libraries. On
10/11/14 14:51, Luis Azedo wrote:
if you still want me to revert from master i will do it
Master is ok for me until
there is a good solution agreed by most
developers.