On 12/12/14 10:01, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
ok, so you suggest that a new valid inner xavp name 'q' is added?
Yes, that xavp is supposed to collect details for processing current
register, overwriting some attributes -- for now it does with socket --
if exists, it's taken from there instead from local socket that received
the packet.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda