Yes, you are right...thank you :)
I guess my reasoning only applies if using shared table, no replication and therefore always adding path.
Charles
Charles Chance writes:
> Yes, we could use a separate table for each registrar and replicate
> registrations to all of them. But we still need to add Path to ensure
> invites etc go via the server each client used to register (due to client
> NAT). And if that is local to the lookup, it still makes sense to ignore
> the path as it is itself.
load_contacts() automatically prioritizes contacts so that one without
path has higher priority. so, no changes are needed to current code.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev