On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Jan Janak wrote:
perhaps it was
not a good idea to try to merge the modules after all
if also documentation style is different in k and s, because we need
to have two doc subdirs in all of them (one for k and another for
s).
I don't understand this. In both cases it is xml based docbook. The
structure of a docbook document is given. The fact that there are more
files with boilerplate in modules coming from ser does not make it
that much different.
fine if we can have READMEs autogenerated no matter which docbook files
doc subdir contains.
Of course, that will be possible. I don't know what were the steps to
generate READMEs in kamailio, in ser modules we added a Makefile in each
documentation directory and you can just type make txt to generate the
README or make html to generat HTML based documentation.
Hi Jan,
module documentation in kamailio can be generated with (e.g. in old trunk):
- make modules-readme
This will generate the READMEs in all module directories, from the source in
the respective 'doc' sub directory, for all modules that are not in the
exclude_modules list. You can specify a certain module with "make
modules-readme modules=$module_name" as usual.
- modules-docbook-html
- modules-docbook-man
- modules-docbook-pdf
will generates the respective output format in the module directory as well.
We can either add Makefiles to modules in modules_k or
import the kamailio
system. But in any case we will be using the same tools and templates to
generate READMEs.
Sounds good, i prefer to not have two different documentation formats for
modules in our tree.
Cheers,
Henning