Re: [sr-dev] route names

Are PV mathematical expressions evaluated in lexical argument scope of routines that accept a route name?

In other words, maybe it's a problem because

route($(avp(s:port)+1));

or something like that may also have some meaning?

-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 1170 Peachtree Street 12th Floor, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892

On May 5, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com wrote:

i tried to define route

route [+358] { ... }

but got syntax error. is there a good reason why + is not allowed in name of route?

-- juha

---

sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev