On 28 Oct 2014 13:46, "Alex Hermann" <alex@speakup.nl> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 28 October 2014, Андрей Рыбкин wrote:
> > Module DMQ_SYNC:
> >   The module add replication between multiple servers via DMQ module.
> >    Currently only usrloc replications.
>
> I think some decision should be made on where syncing code should be placed.
> The htable module has dmq sync integrated, now you introduce a module
> dedicated to syncing via dmq.
>

Personally, I would prefer to see syncing integrated with each module that requires it (as with htable). That way, replication can be implemented in the most appropriate way for that module, instead of making assumptions about how other modules wish to replicate internal state.

Ultimately, whichever way is agreed upon, a single choice is better from the outset.