Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] v5.0.4: nathelper: force_socket not being honoured (#1298)

Ok, thanks for the clarification, however, if the Path header does exist in the userloc record, why does nathelper need to resolve the best interface to use based on the received parameter? Should it not need to resolve the interface to be used based on the first hop in the Path header as this is where it will be sending to directly, it is the next hop that then needs to decide where best to route the message? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1298#issuecomment-342741606