@henningw - thanks for your review and work here! I wrote it more from the perspective that I want to do also a deep review, because tls has some complexity in handling all those per server attributes and I would prefer not to break (if possible!!!). Somehow it was triggered by the reference in the comments about using private memory in the context that most of data for tls is in shared memory. I didn't want to start questioning that, preferring a look at the code before. As it could take time in my side, I made the last remark that people should not wait for me, if they need to do something else.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.