21 Apr
2009
21 Apr
'09
1:04 p.m.
On 04/21/2009 06:59 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
internally it is used via some structure, like pres.get_auth_status().
In config we do not have that. Lot of functions have different names in
C and config.
As it is now, function name suggest more sip auth status with no
relation to presence or watcher. Just my opinion. We had discussions in
the past how to make names for suggestive in relation with provided
functionality and the module that exports them.
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
wouldn't be better to have this function
named: watcher_auth_status()
(or ps_auth_status() - ps from presence server, or other prefix like
pres, presence)? It will be more suggestive about provided
functionality.
presence module has in its api a function called 'get_auth_status'. i
just more or less reused the name so if someone reads presence module
readme, he/she can easily associate those two.