Re: [sr-dev] RFC: removing (disabling) fork=no

On 20 Jan 2016, at 09:19, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hello, wondering if anyone is using fork=no -- some old docs suggest it is suitable for debugging, but actually kamailio doesn't work properly in this mode, leading to more troubles than benefits (e.g., having reports of invalid issues, like tcp not working in this mode). In first phase I would disable setting this value, with a warning if set to no, because most of the configs out there have fork=yes. Removing it could be considered in the future. Note that this fork=no is different than don't daemonize controlled with -D, which will stay being useful for some init.d systems.

Comments or other suggestions? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com http://miconda.eu _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev