30 May
2009
30 May
'09
11:56 a.m.
On 05/30/2009 11:48 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
they are not always strings. As far as I could get it, SR has the old style:
- s: ... - string
- i: ... - int
- no s: or i: - string
- $... - avp alias
In K is:
s: ... - string
- i: ... - int
- no s: or i: - avp alias
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
hmm, here is a conflict between S and K I just
realized now:
- avp name without i: or s: is considered to be string in S and avp
alias in K
what is the need for avp aliases if names are always strings?