Re: [sr-dev] i: and s: avp syntax

On 05/30/2009 11:48 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

...

hmm, here is a conflict between S and K I just realized now:

• avp name without i: or s: is considered to be string in S and avp

alias in K

what is the need for avp aliases if names are always strings?

they are not always strings. As far as I could get it, SR has the old style: - s: ... - string - i: ... - int - no s: or i: - string - $... - avp alias

In K is: s: ... - string - i: ... - int - no s: or i: - avp alias

Cheers, Daniel