19 Aug
2010
19 Aug
'10
9:33 p.m.
Hi Andrei,
You are totally correct. It is just for temporary non-local storage.
I wanted to do some more tests and i wanted to give others the possibility
to test and to give me feedback.
All changes should be fully backward compatible and the extension to the
RTP-Proxy is automatically en-/disabled using configure and autoconf.
Carsten
2010/8/19 Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <andrei(a)iptel.org>
On Aug 19, 2010 at 19:58, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)bock.info> wrote:
--
Carsten Bock
Schomburgstr. 80
22767 Hamburg
Germany
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Home +49 40 34927217
Fax +49 40 34927218
mailto:carsten@bock.info
Module: sip-router
Branch: carstenbock/rtpproxy
Commit: 262e55278e8b8b0e853f00465c38e3a9d13694f0
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=262e552…
Author: Carsten Bock <lists(a)bock.info>
Committer: Carsten Bock <lists(a)bock.info>
Date: Thu Aug 19 19:55:01 2010 +0200
- fixed identation
- added modified RTP-Proxy (rtpproxy.tar.gz, based on latest git, needs
some
cleanup)
Wouldn't be better to add just a patch to the standard rtpproxy and/or
provide a url where one could get the modified version?
Having foreign tar.gz in the sr repository seems strange to me.
(please note, that you have to have libcurl-dev
and libxmlrpc-client
(same as for Kamailio-mi_xmlrpc) installed)
- some simple testing files (sample config,
command line parameters for
pjsua (used for testing) and rtpproxy)
Would this module work also with the standard rtpproxy?
Can it be compiled without the extra libs?
If not, forking it might be a good idea (e.g. standard rtpproxy for
easy upgrade and people that don't need the extra features and modified
rtpproxy with more features).
Andrei
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev