9 Nov
2009
9 Nov
'09
6:56 p.m.
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
Klaus Darilion writes:
ok. depends in your NAT-traversal approach. In my pragmatic approach I
do NAT traversal anyway for all local users, thus it would work for me.
If you have a more advanced NAT traversal approach, probably you need a
second bflag which will is activated either by NAT or TCP.
regards
klaus
I think the "reply" problem needs to be
solved using the registrar NAT
bflag. If NAT flag is set for callee, activate a reply-route with
add_alias() (can be done per branch).
that is not correct, because add_alias() needs to be called even when
reply comes from a tcp ua that is not behind nat.