6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
4:12 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo<ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
2009/8/6 Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
Well, I can't agree. A SIP proxy shouldn't implement a HTTP URI in a
request, or a mailto URI, even if RFC 3261 says "any URI".
Why not?
At the
same time, we could implement support for other URI's, like XMPP
since we have an xmpp gateway.
Yes, should be generic as RFC 3261 which allows all kind of URIs AFAIK the only URI's to implement wouuld be:
- SIP
- SIPS
- TEL
- URN
Why URN yes and HTTP not?
Jan.