2011/10/10 Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
What are you
proposing then Juha? not implementing RFC 5626 and
continuing with custom solutions that don't work well? continuing with
Contact rewritting? No please.
what comes to nat traversal, what are the problems with contact
rewriting? so far it has worked quite well for me.
It's a hack! and it breaks SIP protocol as the UA should see a RURI
matching its Contact in incoming requests, rather than a rewritten
URI.
I cannot understand how the current hack should be preferred instead
of implementing RFC 5626. "It seems to work with current hack" should
not be a valid argument IMHO.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>