Hello,
On 6/26/11 10:15 PM, Matthew Williams wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am I correct that t_continue continues processing in the process that
calls it? If so, would it make sense for the async module to have an
api for other asynchronous modules to hand off to its worker pool
before calling t_continue? Or would it be better for each module to
have its own pool of workers?
right now the workers in async module are dummy
timers to handle async
delayed execution of next actions or specific route block. But there can
be coded a single pool of workers and timers for async processing, might
be a better solution overall.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda --
http://twitter.com/miconda