On Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > I agree. IMHO both kamctl and kamdbctl tools can be promoted as new
> > management scripts for sip-router.
>
> regarding kamctl, i don't think that it is a good idea to include
> possibility to provision database table entries with it. lcr, for
> example, has a large number of fields in gw table and it is very
> cumbersome to try to add gws using kamctl. phpmyadmin, siremis,
> etc. are much better tools for that.
>
> so my suggestion is to drop all db record related operations from
> kamctl.

I also think that the scripts are a bit cumbersome, i never used kamctl for DB provisioning sof far. But aparently some people uses this, as i received a bunch of patches for adding support for cr tables for example, or to fix problems in existing ctl code in the past. So i don't think we should remove it right now. Before that we should add a "this is obselete and its planned to be removed, please speak up now" warning message to the script and let it stay there for one release cycle.

Regards,

Henning