2 Oct
2009
2 Oct
'09
6:46 p.m.
On Thursday 24 September 2009, Alex Hermann wrote:
Scenario 2 breaks. It should enter branch route (or
send out identical
message by itself). From a usability standpoint, I would prefer that the
behavior is identical for received 503 or internal 408. And as every
failover creates a new branch, I think branch_route should be called
everytime.
> > A quick workaround would be that on DNS based failover in case of a
> > timeout, branch route is called again. I tried to find in the source
> > the place where the decision is made whether or not to call branch
> > route on DNS failover, but got lost.
A workaround seems to be to call t_on_branch() again in the branch_route
itself.
--
Greetings,
Alex Hermann