26 aug 2009 kl. 09.47 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
On 26.08.2009 1:51 Uhr, Klaus Darilion wrote:
thanks, I was
wondering if this really belongs to parameters
section, since it can be used in route blocks as well. Maybe a new
section is better -- not sure how to name it now.
It is important to mark such a construct as a configuration engine
option, we've learned in Asterisk where we have two of them. One is
#include that includes a file, another one is #exec that runs a script
and takes stdout and includes that. Both of them are valid in all
configuration files, parsed before the app gets the configuration data.
If you don't mark it a separate option, people will misunderstand it.
Especially in Asterisk where we have both "#include" and
"include=>"
in the dialplan, which wasn't very clever choice of names looking at
it from hindsight.
/O