[sr-dev] textops module comparison

in the irc meeting, i promised to study, if/how textops modules could be merged. below is a comparison. if ? appears as arg, it means that the function has not been documented in README. perhaps the easiest thing to do would be to extract the selects from modules_s/textops to a new modules/sel. comments? -- juha ------------------------------------------------------------------------- s k search(re) x x search_body(re) x search_append(re, txt) x x search_append_body(re, txt) x replace(re, txt) x x replace_body(re, txt) x replace_all(re, txt) x x replace_body_all(re, txt) x replace_body_atonce(re, txt) x subst('/re/repl/flags') x x subst_uri('/re/repl/flags') x x subst_user('/re/repl/flags') x x subst_body('/re/repl/flags') x set_body(txt,content_type) x set_reply_body(txt,content_type) x filter_body(content_type) x append_to_reply(txt) x x append_hf(txt) x x append_hf(txt, hdr) x append_hf_value(?, ?) x insert_hf(txt) x insert_hf(txt, hdr) x insert_hf_value(?, ?) x remove_hf(hname) x x remove_hf_re(re) x x remove_hf_value(?) x remove_hf_value2(?) x assign_hf_value(?, ?) x assign_hf_value2(?, ?) x include_hf_value(?, ?) x exclude_hf_value(?, ?) x hf_value_exists(?, ?) append_urihf(prefix, suffix) x x is_present_hf(hf_name) x x is_present_hf_re(hf_name_re) x append_time() x x is_method(name) x has_body(), has_body(mime) x is_privacy(privacy_type) x cmp_str(str1, str2) x cmp_istr(str1, str2) x starts_with(str1, str2) x msg_apply_changes() x selects x