Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
@space88man: there are many deployments on older systems, so I would not remove anything from tls module right now.
I think it is better to get first the tls_wolfssl working properly as an alternative to the tls (openssl) module. But, being a new module, it can be developed to only support the newer versions of libwolfssl and without being compatible with old versions of libssl (openssl). In other words, you can remove the parts that related to OpenSSL < 1.1.1 in the new module tls_wolfssl.
Once tested and results are satisfactory, then we can look what are the common parts still left between the two modules and decide what would be a best way to deal with. But I won't spend time now to think about nor even attempt to extract code from tls module to another one.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.