Hi Juha,
It must be something silly that I am doing then, but I can't see what.
This code fragment:
if (msg->contact || parse_headers(msg, HDR_CONTACT_F, 0) != -1)
{
if (parse_contact(msg->contact) < 0)
{
LM_ERR("parsing Contact: header body\n");
return 0;
}
contact = ((contact_body_t *)
msg->contact->parsed)->contacts;
if (!contact)
{
LM_ERR("empty Contact:\n");
return 0;
}
if (parse_uri(contact->uri.s, contact->uri.len, &puri) < 0)
{
LM_ERR("parsing Contact-URI\n");
return 0;
}
if (parse_params(&puri.params, CLASS_CONTACT, &hooks,
¶ms) != 0)
{
LM_ERR("parsing Contact-URI parameters\n");
return 0;
}
if (msg->REQ_METHOD == METHOD_REGISTER &&
hooks.contact.reg_id)
{
LM_INFO("found REGISTER with ;reg-id paramter on"
"Contact-URI - outbound used\n");
return 1;
}
Prints out the last diagnostic when reg-id is a Contact-URI parameter, but
not a Contact: header parameter.
I've no idea why, but this is obviously not right. Any ideas?
Peter
peter,
i just tested and at least when reg-id and +sip.instance are in contact
header
Contact:
<sip:0x82a0798@192.98.102.10:5052;transport=tcp>;expires=600;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:447ff092-6236-47d9-bc0a-a3c6856aacf2>";q=0.8;reg-id=1.
of register request, they do get parsed correctly, because they show up
in instance and reg_id fields of location table.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd