@alexyosifov approved this pull request.
- // for Reply and TCP sends from P-CSCF server
port, for Reply and UDP sends from P-CSCF client port
- src_port = dst_proto
== PROTO_TCP ? s->port_ps : s->port_pc;
+ // Check send socket
+ struct socket_info * client_sock = grep_sock_info(via_host.af == AF_INET ?
&ipsec_listen_addr : &ipsec_listen_addr6, src_port, dst_proto);
+ if(client_sock) {
+ // for Reply and TCP sends from P-CSCF server port, for Reply and UDP sends
from P-CSCF client port
+ src_port = dst_proto == PROTO_TCP ? s->port_ps : s->port_pc;
- // for Reply and TCP sends to UE client port, for Reply and UDP sends to UE
server port
- dst_port = dst_proto == PROTO_TCP ? s->port_uc : s->port_us;
+ // for Reply and TCP sends to UE client port, for Reply and UDP sends to UE
server port
+ dst_port = dst_proto == PROTO_TCP ? s->port_uc : s->port_us;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ src_port = s->port_pc;
+ dst_port = s->port_us;
+ }
Why you have to check "send socket" here? You perform the check with zero
src_port and dst_proto.
The "send socket" always is present. If you scroll down at row 877 there is the
same check and if "send socket" is not present the function returns an error.
I do not see value from this change and I am not sure this will work properly.
Correct me if I am wrong.
+ // cipher_null, des, des3_ede, aes
strcpy(l_enc_algo->alg_name,"cipher_null");
+ if (strncasecmp(r_ealg.s,"aes-cbc",r_ealg.len) == 0) {
+ LM_DBG("Creating security associations: AES\n");
+ strcpy(l_enc_algo->alg_name,"aes");
+ l_enc_algo->alg_key_len = ck.len * 4;
+ string_to_key(l_enc_algo->alg_key, ck);
+ }
+ else if (strncasecmp(r_ealg.s,"des-ede3-cbc",r_ealg.len) == 0) {
+ LM_DBG("Creating security associations: DES, ck.len=%d\n",ck.len);
+ strcpy(l_enc_algo->alg_name,"des3_ede");
+ str ck1;
+ ck1.s = pkg_malloc (128);
+ strncpy(ck1.s,ck.s,32);
+ strncat(ck1.s,ck.s,16);
+ ck1.len=32+16;
+
+ l_enc_algo->alg_key_len = ck1.len * 4;
+ string_to_key(l_enc_algo->alg_key, ck1);
+
+ pkg_free(ck1.s);
+ }
Is it a good idea cipher algorithm to be optional? Just add a new value in _cflags
parameter in int ipsec_create(struct sip_msg* m, udomain_t* d, int _cflags) method.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2731#pullrequestreview-655573226