29 Jul
2011
29 Jul
'11
5:22 p.m.
On Friday 29 July 2011, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 7/29/11 4:00 PM, Alex Hermann wrote:
Indeed there is kind of "conflict of interests" here. Maybe the ipops
can get a slightly different implementation, where the match can be,
based on parameters, restricted to a network address match. I thought
would be useful in non-nat-travesal cases, where nathelper is not loaded.
IMHO general ip to netmask matching should belong in ipops. For now i still
believe the check for rfc1918 addresses is more suitable for nathelper. As
long as the function is available, i don't care very much where it is, i just
hope the code duplication will stop at one point.
--
Greetings,
Alex Hermann