9 Apr
2021
9 Apr
'21
12:26 p.m.
Dear all
Would you have any feedback about this query?
thanks a lot!
David Escartín
El jue, 11 feb 2021 a las 23:56, David Escartin (<descartin(a)sonoc.io>)
escribió:
Hello
seems with t_flush_xflags() after setxflag on failure_route, it makes it
work. However i don't know if that should be the expected behaviour, since
with regular transaction flags there is no need to use t_flush_flags()
best regards
david
El mié, 10 feb 2021 a las 16:08, David Escartin (<descartin(a)sonoc.io>)
escribió:
--
[image: Logo]
David Escartín Almudévar
VoIP/Switch Engineer
descartin(a)sonoc.io
*SONOC*
C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
Dear all
i think i have noticed a wrong behaviour with xflags. When they are set
in a failure_route and a t_relay is done after that to a destination, its
state is lost in the next on_reply route.
This doesn't happen with regular transaction flags, and it doesn't happen
with xflags either when xflag is set inside an onreply_route.
We have seen it on versions 5.3 and 5.4
Could you please confirm this?
thanks a lot
regards
david escartin
--
[image: Logo]
David Escartín Almudévar
VoIP/Switch Engineer
descartin(a)sonoc.io
*SONOC*
C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
--
[image: Logo]
David Escartín Almudévar
VoIP/Switch Engineer
descartin(a)sonoc.io
*SONOC*
C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España
Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io