I think 827ec4f may have just cracked it, log output with that patch:

10(19456) INFO: <script>: route[REQ_1]: INIT
10(19456) INFO: <script>: route[REQ_1]: status 200
10(19456) INFO: <script>: route[REQ_1]: Sending REQ_2
10(19456) INFO: <script>: route[REQ_2]: INIT
10(19456) INFO: <script>: route[REQ_2]: status 200

Which is exactly as expected. Hopefully this doesn't have any further implications as it certainly seems the cleanest fix of those suggested.

Thanks again for the quick response

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.