Richard Fuchs writes:This is great news. In my opinion it would be better to rename
> We're slowly getting ready for a new major release of mediaproxy-ng
> (3.x), which will include some exciting new features, most importantly
> much improved support for WebRTC. To support those features, rtpproxy-ng
> needs to support additional flags for the offer/answer functions.
rtpproxy-ng module rather than leave its existing version hanging there,
because I'm sure that current users of the module will migrate to the
new one anyhow.
-- Juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev