Thanks for update. Can you wrap your patch in some define, so it can be applied while keeping the libunistring as alternative? Something like:
#ifdef USE_UTF8_EMBEDDED
// your code here
#else
// libunistring function call
#endif
Then it can be pushed without any problem to the master branch, allowing me (and others) to test it easily. After that we can re-evaluate to remove libunistring completely or maybe just make the embedded version default.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/02/14 07:45, Timo Teras wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:34:35 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Was there any resolution on this topic? I would like to get rid ofI think the patch was not 'blessed' yet.
the unnecessary dependency, the code looked fine at a quick check --
if it is just about utf8 encoding/decoding.
Eventually it can be made a compile time switch with defines for both
options, keep the code for both cases and be able to easily switch
from one to another.
Peter asked for testing results along the lines of:
Something as simple as a loop through all possible values calling yourThe calling the function with every possible utf-8 string is
function, the libunistring function, and comparing the results would
be perfect.
impossible test plan.
Dunno. Perhaps you want to push the patch with dictator hat on, or some
sane test plan can be made. For now, I just applied the patch to my
local builds and forgot this.
- Timo
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda