25 Apr
2013
25 Apr
'13
8:28 p.m.
I think you have that now by using your new flag?
On 25/04/13 18:21, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Peter Dunkley writes:
I don't understand (functionally) what the
difference between a
flow-token in a Path: header and the received parameter is. So I don't
understand why a flow-token can't be put in a Path: header when using
GRUU.
most likely you are correct, i.e., there is no problem with flow token
in path header of register request as long as there is a way to avoid
flow token in r-r uris.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev