On 02 Oct 2015, at 09:42, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/10/15 07:16, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
On 01 Oct
2015, at 23:07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I pushed two commits, because yours was resulting in compile errors due
to different name in declaration of the function prototype. Then I
noticed that the connection was not released after it was looked up. I
hope I haven't broken other stuff.
Thanks. Changed the name in last minute
based on suggestions, but wasn’t
awake enough to really test again… Ouch.
On the other hand, an explicit function to use
when needing to test if
connection is ok could me more user friendly than handling all the
return codes.
So adding one may worth the trouble for few more lines of
code.
You mean adding my original idea of a function with just true/false checks?
I can do that.
Yes, a function to just say true if the connection is alive, that's what
I expect to be the common use case. Accepting and connecting states are
not for the connections that already received a register packet, but the
existion function is returning true, if some one wants to use a simple
if(...).
Will fix. That was my original function :-)
I also want to add a function that determines if the TCP connection is inbound or
outbound.
/O