12 Dec
2008
12 Dec
'08
5:27 p.m.
On 10-12 11:42, Henning Westerholt wrote:
If this cache just acts as a generic query result
cache, this is already
included in common database servers, like mysql. If their standard cache
behaviour is not sufficient, i think this can be increased in the
configuration, given that enough memory is available. If some want to avoid
the remote server communication overhead, just use a local replication slave.
So i don't see at the moment a compelling need to include functionality like
this in our codebase.
Yes, I agree, and in case of mysql, the query cache in mysql with sufficient
memory does really make a big difference, especially if there is enough
memory to cache all queries done by SER. I tried that a couple of years ago
and managed to cache all queries for abouth 50k users on a wimpy laptop.
Jan.