@henningw
Q: "Is the binding from Kamailio memory manager to library memory manager functionality (ortp_memory_functions etc..) not needed anymore?"

A: I found as least to edge case in oRTP where it was not using the specified memory allocation functions ...
At this point I think it will be less problematic spawn threads from one or more dedicated processes in Kamailio, the worker processes will not interact with the libraries directly.
This seems like a perfectly fine decision in terms of architecture and there will be no more bugs related to shared memory ...

Thank for pinpointing the unwanted modifications to the core

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.