2 Sep
2011
2 Sep
'11
9:15 p.m.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below.
User who did this - Iñaki Baz Castillo (ibc)
Attached to Project - sip-router
Summary - Via parser does not accept any token as transport
Task Type - Bug Report
Category - Core
Status - Assigned
Assigned To - Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
Operating System - All
Severity - Low
Priority - Normal
Reported Version - Development
Due in Version - Undecided
Due Date - Undecided
Details - Hi, sip-router Via parser is not RFC compliant as it does not accept any token
in the transport (even if this does NOT occur in the top Via). A real example: kamailio
receives a REGISTER like this (removing other headers):
REGISTER sip:domain,org SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:9090;branch=z9hG4bK3afb3d8e9ea4c4259f9d;rport
Via: SIP/2.0/WS 1.2.3.4:36638;branch=z9hG4bK5089;received=9.9.9.9;rport=36638
And it fails parsing so also processing the request:
ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1677]: ERROR: parse_via: bad char <W> on
state 122
ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2366]: ERROR: parse_via on: <SIP/2.0/UDP
1.2.3.4:9090;branch=z9hG4bK3afb3d8e9ea4c4259f9d;rport [...]>
ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2370]: ERROR: parse_via parse error, parsed so
far:<SIP/2.0/>
ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:139]: ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad via
INFO: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:353]: ERROR: bad header field [Via: SIP/2.0/WS
1.2.]
Please, make it possible for the Via transport to contain an unknown token, at least when
it does NOT occur in the top Via header. Why should Kamailio care about the second Via
transport field?
Thanks a lot.
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=149
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking
system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future,
you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.