1 Aug
2011
1 Aug
'11
4:10 p.m.
2011/8/1 Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de>de>:
ok, understand. I think we should not introduce two
functions with similar
names and the same behaviour in two modules. Even worse, both use different
implementations (table matching vs. ragel parser). So one commit should be
reverted.
I agree.
A generic is_rfc1918 function in ipops would be nice,
but the nathelper module
also needs this test internally. What about move one of the parsers to the
library dir, and then just including it from both modules?
It would be nice. Is there an already existing library file in which
such function would fit well?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>